quote:
Originally posted by Cagney:
AT 10/11 years old they couldn't have any comprehension of the consequences. Do you think they were acting out at the treatment they got at home? Hurting so badly that they wanted someone else to feel the same pain? Taking on the role that thier father had played for so long?
Is that true? I don't have children myself but I understood from child development theory, and by personal observation, that children are pretty self-aware at that age and have a personal sense of right and wrong. I know that their sense of right and wrong is usually limited though, failing to take account of mitigating circumstances and wider issues so that their choice of punishments, when tested, for misbehaviour can seem quite harsh. They also seem to have the start of a proper sense of humour, which suggests to me that more creative mental connections are talking place.
What's the age of criminal responsibility in Scotland? I thought it was 8. In England, I believe it's 12 and a bit higher in other parts of Europe. I know it can be as low as 7 in some countries. On that basis, I think a child aged 10 must be bordering on understanding the important stuff. What I don't know is how these two boys rate on personal mental development, and that's crucial as all kids develop differently. They could be on the spectrum for all I know.