The point is if he wanted people to know where he was he'd have made a thread or PM'd those he wanted to know as he is a VIP isn't he?  he's certainly not shy at doing threads if he wanted it publicy known he was off for a bit. . hence my noting that a PM is private and not for public consumption especially if it is sent to a Moderator.   Bad form

I reckon if velvet's upset by it he'll let us know on his return. Meantime I'm glad to know he's not just vanished

Me too ........I think he probably just didn't want to be accused of flouncing.

Is this Peter's latest video? (I think he's mellowing).

I do hope this doesn't turn into some big debate .I wondered where Velvet was and now I know ...the end .

PS I will kick his ass for sending me a PM

yeah, heaven forbid a thread on a forum turns into a debate

Im...........................not saying anything.

I hope VD is ok, he pm'ed me to get me back the other day after my "flounce" the other night...it was nice of him to care lol.

again, it's not who or what it is about, it is the fact it was about a PM... I don't see why people don't get that bit.. just because the person that one was from may not mind, which is a presumption in itself,   tis ok to talk about private message content. . it shouldn't be ok at any time, regardless..  

I was being kind ,in your case an arguement over friggin nothing !!

why don't you go trawl for your ghoulish news and video stuff that you love so much erin and ignore me if you don't like my concern over private messages content being revealed and by a Mod too

I don't think there is any need for that sort of comment no matter what your views are Olly 

I'm entitled to my opinion Moonie

erin implied, in a not too nice way, that  I was looking for a row when I made a legitimate point. .why is that ok for her to say? yet I am not allowed to say what I think she does a lot of..

Different rules for different people. . ah well . . carry on 

You are indeed entitled to your opinion Olly, which you made very succinctly but I just didn't see any point in the accompanying sarcasm that's all....

That was my opinion

to which you are fully entitled to Moonie. .

but some of us on here aren't . .  sarcasm or not. . I felt the dig I got warranted a dig back. .not a good way to behave but I am not in a good frame of mind today. .most people on here get the awwwwww never mind if they step out of line as a few often do regularly. . I get the 'she's looking for a barney' comments and no allowance for grump mode..  despite what some may think, I am actually human and I do have feelings . . and sometimes I bite too

Okies..Nuff said methinks 

I agree, lets leave this one here guys.

Yes let's get back on-topic with some wise words from myself on the use of the Union Flag in Scotland.

fair enough, but can you please acknowledge that no Mods or indeed any member should  reveal details of PM's no matter  who  they are from and regardless of whether  others think they won't mind.  ie the point I was trying to address before I got insulted.. 

To be honest Olly in this context personally i dont think its done any harm (other than to give rise to an argument) as Slinki said people were worrying and Fluffy had the answer.

Saying that i do see your point if it were a PM of a sensitive/personal nature.  Basically it's not a black and white thing.

I hear ya 

Jen I know you and others will think I am just arguing for arguments sake, I am not..    it is actually black and white. . PM's are just that, Private Messages.. it's not about whether it has done any harm or not it is about what is right and what is wrong..

if people were worried and Fluffs wanted to reveal details of a PM then she should have PM'd the worried people. .not said anything in public. . you can't change forum rules just because it suits. . they either are private messages, all of them, or not.. and if it is the latter then people need to know that.

Suzy. . LTNS . .saw the lad is not too good...  fingers crossed things will improve soon

I agreed with you over the page 

No worries Fluffs     

Velvet don't do that again 

Hi erin  

 Nice to see you back Velvet

Women Rule! (music video)



Women Rule! (YouTube)
(Music - Thing called love - video in homage to girls with guns)

Gynarchy International (Yahoo Group)

To all GENTLEMEN -
Thank you for your service.
The women will be in charge from now on.
We trust we can rely on your peaceful submission.

In subordination to Gynarchy International and other women's, feminist or lesbian supremacist organisations, the video reaffirms -

• female supremacy
• the absolute power of women over men worldwide.

Video by Peter Dow, a submissive male so sex-starved and pussy-whipped you may not know whether to laugh or cry!

I'm definitely laughing.

I'm at work and can't even view the vid Cinds, but I'm laughing too

"Gentlemen, thank you for your service"

I think my username says it all  

*holds power over men in own hands*

She's the Pollockshields Miss Whiplash  

And worth every penny  

I haven't watched the video either.

West-end Miss Whiplash . . . but I'm prepared tae travel    x

I think VD and Peter Dow are the same person, just putting an idea out there.

oi!  the sooside's MY patch!