Skip to main content

Replies sorted oldest to newest

No, I don't think they will get back together.  I hope they don't because they don't love each other and that is the only reason any two people should get back together after a split.  Nor do I think it was a publicity stunt in the first place.  They are just not suited as a couple.  For the sake of the children, they should stay separated imo.
Twee Surgeon
Reference Aimee Yesterday at 18:35:
 i did think it was a publicity stunt at the start, but i'm not so sure now
A lot of people thought it was a stunt at the beginning. I remember hearing, shortly after the announcement of their split, that one bookies was offering evens that they'd be back together before the end of the year. In that context, I think the most remarkable thing is not that (as the OP says) the odds have been "slashed" to 4/1, but that they were ever as high as 100/1,



Having said that: I agree with the others here. Things have gone too far, and I can't see it happening now.
Eugene's Lair
Reference:
No, I don't think they will get back together. I hope they don't because they don't love each other and that is the only reason any two people should get back together after a split. Nor do I think it was a publicity stunt in the first place. They are just not suited as a couple. For the sake of the children, they should stay separated imo
Hi Twee,

See 'Wolf Hill' won the Booker. I still haven't got it yet....but I will; thanks for the recommendation. ~x
subatomic partygirl
Reference:
http://www.dailystar.co.uk/new.../JORDAN-GOES-MENTAL/
Ahh well, this is the thing .... you can't have it all ways can you.

I can understand that having paps following you 24/7 must be a right pain .... but it's the paperazzi who help to keep her in the public eye.

Reminds me of Vicky Beckham ... she's the same.

It goes with the territory I'm afraid
Angel
Interesting. Surprised to see that so many think that this isnt a publicity stunt, considering it involves two people who will do anything for publicity.. I think they wouldnt have made it obvious by getting back together straight away. They wouldve waited some time and then got back together. It is convenient though that this was done just in time for Petes new album which SOMEHOW went to no.3.
likeafire
Reference: 
Hi Twee, See 'Wolf Hill' won the Booker. I still haven't got it yet....but I will; thanks for the recommendation. ~x
hiya Sub   It's great that she won.  Well deserved too.  I have started a thread in the Lounge about it, so pop in and comment when you start it.  I agree with you re. Katie and Peter ... if the cameras were turned off that would be their biggest punishment.  They seem to be acting out a role that the media has created for them and they are trying to score points off each other all the time.  I like Katie and Peter as individuals but together they are badly matched.
Twee Surgeon
Reference:
Twee Surgeon 3781 Forum PostsYesterday at 19:12 (Edited: ) Reference: Hi Twee, See 'Wolf Hill' won the Booker. I still haven't got it yet....but I will; thanks for the recommendation. ~x hiya Sub It's great that she won. Well deserved too. I have started a thread in the Lounge about it, so pop in and comment when you start it. I agree with you re. Katie and Peter ... if the cameras were turned off that would be their biggest punishment. They seem to be acting out a role that the media has created for them and they are trying to score points off each other all the time. I like Katie and Peter as individuals but together they are badly matched.

Hi Twee,

I agree that they seem to (more and more) be becoming stereotypes of their own / press creation. Weird. I watched his programme last night....it was curiously boring yet nauseating at the same time.


I will pop into the Lounge for a lit chat. Haven't had one in ages. For now, though, I have to go do what I do best; bore young people for a couple of hours.  
subatomic partygirl

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×