One aspect of Joanna Lumleys' fight for the right of Gurkhas to have unlimited right of residence in this country that hasn't been examined as far as I can find is the effect it will have on the Gurkha regiment itself.
The current Nepalese government has stated that it wishes to end the practise of Gurkhas serving in the British and Indian armies because it regards the practice as "slavery". The only reason that it has allowed the practice to continue is because of the amount of money that serving Gurkhas send back to Nepal and the pension money received by former Gurkhas. If this money is cut off because Gurkhas take up the right to reside in Britain then this money will be cut off and the nepalese government will have no reason to allow its' citzens to serve in foreign armies.
Joanna Lumleys' campaign, which undoubtedly has moral right on its side, may end up destroying the very basis on which the Gurkha Regiment exists.
Sometimes the best of intentions has the worst of consequences.
The current Nepalese government has stated that it wishes to end the practise of Gurkhas serving in the British and Indian armies because it regards the practice as "slavery". The only reason that it has allowed the practice to continue is because of the amount of money that serving Gurkhas send back to Nepal and the pension money received by former Gurkhas. If this money is cut off because Gurkhas take up the right to reside in Britain then this money will be cut off and the nepalese government will have no reason to allow its' citzens to serve in foreign armies.
Joanna Lumleys' campaign, which undoubtedly has moral right on its side, may end up destroying the very basis on which the Gurkha Regiment exists.
Sometimes the best of intentions has the worst of consequences.