No because they'd have to scrap all tasks and I'm sure they make them sign contracts to cover themselves....

Claim the insurance company that covers BB for accidents and injury ,BB must be covered surely.

Simple answer: No

Detailed Answer: No they won't.

You should take up law Rawky....

A SARS task would be good.  Released into the compound, last man or woman standing wins.

No - they'll keep them, but they may change the nature of the tasks.

Two things to remember:

Firstly, although the competitiveness might go up a notch, S&R tasks are still tasks. An accident could potentially happen in any task, The only real qustion is whether BB playtested the spider task properly beforehand, and did a proper risk assessment.

Secondly, BB has always had to consider what they're going to do if/when Steve finally goes up. Phil Edgar-Jones was asked about this when the S&R tasks were first revealed, and his answer was that although the individual S&R tasks are planned ages in advance, they've got alternatives lined-up that Steve would be able to take part in. They may well start wheeling those less physical tasks out now...

Arm wrestling?

And TBH .............I really can't see why the tasks always have to be physical ...................there's loads of other stuff they could do.

Does it matter if they sign a waiver , is that legally binding .
What about medical cover?
(spelling police I have rectified)

You'd need to be bloody careful signing a waifer. 

Simple answer: No

Detailed Answer: No they won't.



hahahahaha

She fell the wrong way on her ankle. It happens. Do we really want to go the way of America where having a person anywhere near your premises is frankly too risky in case they get a cold from standing too close to your fridge and sue you?

HOPEFULLY SAR WILL CONTINUE !!!

I think the whole reason why SAR was created was to remove, or at least limit, block voting.  It has to that extent been a huge success, as proven by the lack of "us v them" group mentality we've seen on previous BB series.

I am all for the SAR ,I also am against "Sue mentality",I only asked if it could be an issue,cheers

That's certainly a large part of it, but SAR also makes the "radar dodgers" a little more vulnerable. Rachael (i.e. the first evictee) would probably have gone up at some point, but I think Nathan would have coasted to the final week if it hadn't been for SAR. OK, no-one's had the guts to put Josie or Steve up yet, but I think they'll soon run out of alternatives: they can't keep choosing Mario as a "safe" option.
As with BB9's "Head of House", I think SAR will become increasingly important as the series progresses...

I think SAR needs to be kept just to ensure consistency at this point. It might however be prudent to stick with a less physical task – such as the facial puzzles from week 3 that was in fact an exciting and competitive scramble for victory!

If Keeley comes back they will have to stick to the less strenuous tasks or it would simply be unfair!

LOL