I was baptised one at birth, but that's as far as it ever went.
I was 17 at the time and believed in God, but not the stupid rules.
Pope Benny has inspired apathy in Cafflicks, from the moment the white smoke appeared.
Voting him in was a Cardinal sin.
BBC: The ex-PM invited Pope
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/8271556.stm
BBC: The Queen invited Pope
http://news.bbc.co.uk/local/le..._8579000/8579900.stm
Per Wiki re a State visit:
A state visit is a formal visit by a foreign head of state to another nation, at the invitation of that nation's head of state. State visits are the highest form of diplomatic contact between two nations, and are marked by ceremonial pomp and diplomatic protocol. In parliamentary democracies, heads of state may formally issue and accept invitations. However, they do so on the consent of their governments, who usually agree together on when the invitation is to be issued or accepted in advance
As far as I can tell, based on the dates shown on the BBC links above, GB initiated the invite, then presumably requested the Queen in one of their private meeting to make this a state visit by asking her to invite the pope. But in all probability, this was something which had been discussed between GB and the Queen before he spoke to the pope, We will never know unless GB decides to tell the world.
*** does funny wave ***
Pope Benedict XVI flies in amid row over aide's race remarks
Pope Benedict XVI . . . under suspicion by 'Old Catholics'. Photograph: Alberto Pizzoli/AFP/Getty Images
The pope's visit to the UK is mired in controversy after one of Benedict XVI's senior advisers dropped out after comparing an arrival in multicultural Britain to landing "in a third-world country".
Cardinal Walter Kasper â the Vatican's leading expert on relations with the Church of England â also accused the UK of discriminating against Christians.
The cardinal's remarks, made hours before the papal party was due to land in Edinburgh this morning, came in an interview with the German news magazine Focus, in which he noted that Britain was a "secular, pluralistic" country.
Asked by the magazine whether Christians were discriminated against in the UK, Kasper replied: "Yes. Above all, an aggressive new atheism has spread through Britain. If, for example, you wear a cross on British Airways, you are discriminated against."
Kasper appears to have been referring to events in 2006, when BA was embroiled in a bitter row after taking disciplinary action against an airport worker who refused to cover up a necklace carrying a cross which she wore outside her uniform.
The cardinal's comments on "aggressive" atheism drew an angry response from secular campaigners who said the UK did not need a "lecture" on religious freedom and belief from the Vatican â but were welcomed by some Christians.
The rest you can read here http://www.guardian.co.uk/worl...ict-xvi-aide-remarks
Someone please tell the twit that ALL necklaces were prohibited for BA desk staff, in case a nutter tried to throttle them. That particular woman just went public to make an issue out of a situation where there wasn't one.
I don't understand this "aggressive" atheism claptrap. Atheists don't set up missions all over the world to try to convert the locals, or tell people they'll suffer eternal damnation unless they change their ways.
Said the Pope a few hours ago
God if only he had been in charge of the dept that looked into these things it would have been different he would have spoken out and not silenced people for * the 'good of the universal Church'
*edited to add the
as long as they have return tickets, presumably!
I didn't know that, Deman.
Yes, but that was 'just' physical abuse, apparently!
Sorry, I've just come in from work and haven't read all the thread. On the other hand LL some religions aren't tolerant of ours or our beliefs either, so I guess you could say it works both ways.
"Nothing personal -but who on earth wants and believes in a papal blessing anyway?" I highly provocative statement.
I do have a problem with the catholic faith - BUT I have a problem with any religion that imposes strict rules and regulations on it's followers and for reasons listed here already
But as you say so rightly he does have a right to go on State visits.
I still maintain that in these harsh times it is a bit steep for tax payers to be footing the bill. BUT I would say that if any head of state were to visit with all the pomp and circumstance at this time.
Why the hell not? I'm not a Christian and I couldn't give a toss if it was "wiped out". Glad you added your qualification though cause it ain't on the verge of anything yet. Mores the pity.