quote:
Originally posted by Lockes no 1 fan:
quote:
Originally posted by Daniel J*:
Some of them are not just opinions, they're arguments in favour of one thing or another. The reasons in the arguments can be argued against, which is what we're doing. I'm inclined to think he was set up by the parents of the first kid but I think the arguments put forward by some others in favour of MJ's innocence are poor. If you see what I mean.
Daniel whats your argument for his innocence
Oh lordy, I wouldn't argue for his innocence as I don't have all the facts. However, I'm inclined to think he's innocent simply because I think very rich people are often targets for the poor and he was obviously not looking after his own welfare back then. He's innocent before the law though, and that's important. I also think he was a fool for paying the first kid off because the allegations have not been properly tested in court thus allowing people to speculate more freely.