Skip to main content

quote:
Originally posted by Big Brothers Big Scam:
quote:
Originally posted by old hippy guy:
quote:
Originally posted by jennywren:

Oh yes! I remember bread being 17p one week (out of my ÂĢ15 weekly wage) and rising to about 23p the next week. Might not be quite the right figures, but it was a huge rise, and, put simply, I could not afford to buy bread under Labour. I was a Labour voter then, but never since. And I've never been so hungry since, either.



I was once sacked because I dared to turn up to work on a cold winters day on my motorbike wearing my full leathers, yes, NO other reason, I remember the bosses words,
"get out and dont come back, this is an artist studio NOT a hells angels club house"


odd how recollections differ isnt it, i can remember being sacked (under a labour government) not for doing a bad job or being late or even braking a dress code but for the simple fact that i refused to join a trade union and pay part of my earnings to support the labour party, i think the words to me were something along the lines of "i'm sorry but this council operates a closed shop and you have to join the union"

luckily for me thatcher got in and i was able to start my own company (with government support for the first two years) which enabled me to employ more people and make plenty of money, which i could spend on what i chose because i wasnt paying 90% in income tax as i would have been under labour, YES, 90%.


And here is the crux of the matter. Thatcher destroyed the unions and destroyed industry and we are beginning to pay for that now, because the country doesn't actually make very much any more and is too dependent on the service industry.

On the other hand, she did make it easier for small enterprises to blossom and grow and for new money to spawn the enterprise culture.

The poor just don't like the rich, however they got their money.
jennywren
quote:
Originally posted by Liverpoollass:
quote:
Originally posted by Lockes no 1 fan:


see the front page every day in the newsagent.....thats enough for me


So, you just look at the front page and make your decision on that?



oh its surprising what you can fit on the front page...........about all them immigrants..benefit scroungers etc etc should I go on
Lockes
quote:
Originally posted by Lockes no 1 fan:
quote:
Originally posted by jennywren:
quote:
Originally posted by Daniel J*:
quote:
Originally posted by squiggle:
Oh dear indeed try making a similar joke about the Guardian and see how you get on then.

Would any Guardian reader care? Daily Mail readers have inferiority and/or persecution complexes. That's probably why they read the Daily Mail in the first place. There must be some good reason for reading a comic like that. Ninja

*runs away*


I really don't understand this inverted snobbery against the Daily Mail. Most people who make disparaging remarks about the paper and its readers have probably never actually read it, so they don't know what they are talking about. They're just repeating a mantra they picked up somewhere which they think sounds clever.



see the front page every day in the newsagent.....thats enough for me


So, you judge a book by its cover, or a newspaper by its headlines?
jennywren
quote:
Originally posted by Big Brothers Big Scam:
quote:
Originally posted by old hippy guy:
quote:
Originally posted by jennywren:

Oh yes! I remember bread being 17p one week (out of my ÂĢ15 weekly wage) and rising to about 23p the next week. Might not be quite the right figures, but it was a huge rise, and, put simply, I could not afford to buy bread under Labour. I was a Labour voter then, but never since. And I've never been so hungry since, either.



I was once sacked because I dared to turn up to work on a cold winters day on my motorbike wearing my full leathers, yes, NO other reason, I remember the bosses words,
"get out and dont come back, this is an artist studio NOT a hells angels club house"


odd how recollections differ isnt it, i can remember being sacked (under a labour government) not for doing a bad job or being late or even braking a dress code but for the simple fact that i refused to join a trade union and pay part of my earnings to support the labour party, i think the words to me were something along the lines of "i'm sorry but this council operates a closed shop and you have to join the union"

luckily for me thatcher got in and i was able to start my own company (with government support for the first two years) which enabled me to employ more people and make plenty of money, which i could spend on what i chose because i wasnt paying 90% in income tax as i would have been under labour, YES, 90%.



My Dad said something similar about the unions too....and he is from the North East Eeker Big Grin

And...to be honest, who is to say that this rise in unemployment won't result in similar treatment of workers as OHG experienced under conservatives??? Just because labour are in govt, it doesn't mean that employers won't use the threat of sacking/redundancy against their workers. That has nowt to do with govt....
MrsB
quote:
Originally posted by electric6:
*Is baffled by the dogged loyalty, defence and personal feeling of ownership towards a newspaper*

Confused


I'm baffled by the constant attacks on one of the world's best-selling newspapers.

All the Daily Mail is guilty of, is jingoism. And support for that was pretty well reflected in this week's election results.
jennywren
quote:
Originally posted by MrsB:
quote:
Originally posted by Big Brothers Big Scam:
quote:
Originally posted by old hippy guy:
quote:
Originally posted by jennywren:

Oh yes! I remember bread being 17p one week (out of my ÂĢ15 weekly wage) and rising to about 23p the next week. Might not be quite the right figures, but it was a huge rise, and, put simply, I could not afford to buy bread under Labour. I was a Labour voter then, but never since. And I've never been so hungry since, either.



I was once sacked because I dared to turn up to work on a cold winters day on my motorbike wearing my full leathers, yes, NO other reason, I remember the bosses words,
"get out and dont come back, this is an artist studio NOT a hells angels club house"


odd how recollections differ isnt it, i can remember being sacked (under a labour government) not for doing a bad job or being late or even braking a dress code but for the simple fact that i refused to join a trade union and pay part of my earnings to support the labour party, i think the words to me were something along the lines of "i'm sorry but this council operates a closed shop and you have to join the union"

luckily for me thatcher got in and i was able to start my own company (with government support for the first two years) which enabled me to employ more people and make plenty of money, which i could spend on what i chose because i wasnt paying 90% in income tax as i would have been under labour, YES, 90%.



My Dad said something similar about the unions too....and he is from the North East Eeker Big Grin

And...to be honest, who is to say that this rise in unemployment won't result in similar treatment of workers as OHG experienced under conservatives??? Just because labour are in govt, it doesn't mean that employers won't use the threat of sacking/redundancy against their workers. That has nowt to do with govt....



it has everything to do with government
Lockes
quote:
Originally posted by Lockes no 1 fan:
quote:
Originally posted by Liverpoollass:
quote:
Originally posted by Lockes no 1 fan:


see the front page every day in the newsagent.....thats enough for me


So, you just look at the front page and make your decision on that?



oh its surprising what you can fit on the front page...........about all them immigrants..benefit scroungers etc etc should I go on


And how much do they cost the country? Can we afford to pay benefits to people who weren't born here and have never paid taxes? Can we afford to pay wages to people who send their wages back to their home countries to the tune of about ÂĢ40million?
jennywren
quote:
Originally posted by jennywren:
quote:
Originally posted by Lockes no 1 fan:
quote:
Originally posted by Liverpoollass:
quote:
Originally posted by Lockes no 1 fan:


see the front page every day in the newsagent.....thats enough for me


So, you just look at the front page and make your decision on that?



oh its surprising what you can fit on the front page...........about all them immigrants..benefit scroungers etc etc should I go on


And how much do they cost the country? Can we afford to pay benefits to people who weren't born here and have never paid taxes? Can we afford to pay wages to people who send their wages back to their home countries to the tune of about ÂĢ40million?



ok then thats took an interesting turn ...... Disappointed Disappointed
Lockes
quote:
Originally posted by electric6:
Ahh jeez, Crunchy makes a light hearted joke and the whole thread is derailed by pet lips and foot stamping.

And yet at other times folk complain not enough young uns take notice of what's going on in the world. I guess he should go back to talking about Cheryl Cole.


what is sad, is that is was a tongue in cheek joke, but some seem to have lost their SOH
LGS
quote:
Originally posted by Lockes no 1 fan:
quote:
Originally posted by MrsB:
quote:
Originally posted by Big Brothers Big Scam:
quote:
Originally posted by old hippy guy:
quote:
Originally posted by jennywren:

Oh yes! I remember bread being 17p one week (out of my ÂĢ15 weekly wage) and rising to about 23p the next week. Might not be quite the right figures, but it was a huge rise, and, put simply, I could not afford to buy bread under Labour. I was a Labour voter then, but never since. And I've never been so hungry since, either.



I was once sacked because I dared to turn up to work on a cold winters day on my motorbike wearing my full leathers, yes, NO other reason, I remember the bosses words,
"get out and dont come back, this is an artist studio NOT a hells angels club house"


odd how recollections differ isnt it, i can remember being sacked (under a labour government) not for doing a bad job or being late or even braking a dress code but for the simple fact that i refused to join a trade union and pay part of my earnings to support the labour party, i think the words to me were something along the lines of "i'm sorry but this council operates a closed shop and you have to join the union"

luckily for me thatcher got in and i was able to start my own company (with government support for the first two years) which enabled me to employ more people and make plenty of money, which i could spend on what i chose because i wasnt paying 90% in income tax as i would have been under labour, YES, 90%.



My Dad said something similar about the unions too....and he is from the North East Eeker Big Grin

And...to be honest, who is to say that this rise in unemployment won't result in similar treatment of workers as OHG experienced under conservatives??? Just because labour are in govt, it doesn't mean that employers won't use the threat of sacking/redundancy against their workers. That has nowt to do with govt....



it has everything to do with government


I meant to say which patry was in power Blush My brain and fingers are all confuddled...sorry!
MrsB
quote:
Originally posted by love greek sunsets:
what is sad, is that is was a tongue in cheek joke, but some seem to have lost their SOH

Yes, very true.

You know if he'd have said something about the stereotype of Sun readers wanting boob jobs claimable on expenses I think most folks would have laughed (even though it would have been a blatant JOKE)

EVERY newspaper has it's stereotype headline, stereotype reader...not just the Mail.
Leccy
quote:
Originally posted by MrsB:
But, as I said earlier..thousands of other families are affected by one of them working away from the area...they are not helped with a second home...they have to buy/rent their own... and buy their own food, furnish it etc...


Hmmm, I'm not sure about your figure and what help such people get.

The point is, we will end up with less women going into politics, less men with school age children, less people who give a damn about their families.

I'm not sure you'd want that. Confused
Blizz'ard
quote:
Originally posted by Big Brothers Big Scam:

odd how recollections differ isnt it, i can remember being sacked (under a labour government) not for doing a bad job or being late or even braking a dress code but for the simple fact that i refused to join a trade union and pay part of my earnings to support the labour party, i think the words to me were something along the lines of "i'm sorry but this council operates a closed shop and you have to join the union"

luckily for me thatcher got in and i was able to start my own company (with government support for the first two years) which enabled me to employ more people and make plenty of money, which i could spend on what i chose because i wasnt paying 90% in income tax as i would have been under labour, YES, 90%.


I have always been a strong supporter of trades unions, but never agreed with the "closed shop" in fact I voted against it several times in union meetings when it was proposed in places I have worked,
BUT on the other hand, if a person decides that they dont want the protection of a trades union, then from that day on, every pay increase, or holliday, or cut in working hours, or ANYTHING that the union in question gains for the work force should ONLY be for union members,

all non union members would be free to negotiate their own individual working terms and conditions,....so when the non union worker is told to take a pay cut, or work extra hours, they are on their own...and lets see how far that would get them,
ya cant have ya cake AND eat it,
and you cant have the BENEFITS of being in a union, if you are NOT in the union, Nod
old hippy guy
quote:
Originally posted by Blizzie:
quote:
Originally posted by MrsB:
But, as I said earlier..thousands of other families are affected by one of them working away from the area...they are not helped with a second home...they have to buy/rent their own... and buy their own food, furnish it etc...


Hmmm, I'm not sure about your figure and what help such people get.

The point is, we will end up with less women going into politics, less men with school age children, less people who give a damn about their families.

I'm not sure you'd want that. Confused


No I don't want that!....maybe they can have a flat rather than halls then... Big Grin

As for not giving a damn about families...plenty of people who are with theirs 24/7 don't give a damn....seperation from them due to work doesn't stop you caring.
MrsB
quote:
Originally posted by old hippy guy:
quote:
Originally posted by Big Brothers Big Scam:

odd how recollections differ isnt it, i can remember being sacked (under a labour government) not for doing a bad job or being late or even braking a dress code but for the simple fact that i refused to join a trade union and pay part of my earnings to support the labour party, i think the words to me were something along the lines of "i'm sorry but this council operates a closed shop and you have to join the union"

luckily for me thatcher got in and i was able to start my own company (with government support for the first two years) which enabled me to employ more people and make plenty of money, which i could spend on what i chose because i wasnt paying 90% in income tax as i would have been under labour, YES, 90%.


I have always been a strong supporter of trades unions, but never agreed with the "closed shop" in fact I voted against it several times in union meetings when it was proposed in places I have worked,
BUT on the other hand, if a person decides that they dont want the protection of a trades union, then from that day on, every pay increase, or holliday, or cut in working hours, or ANYTHING that the union in question gains for the work force should ONLY be for union members,

all non union members would be free to negotiate their own individual working terms and conditions,....so when the non union worker is told to take a pay cut, or work extra hours, they are on their own...and lets see how far that would get them,
ya cant have ya cake AND eat it,
and you cant have the BENEFITS of being in a union, if you are NOT in the union, Nod


So you can only get the benefits if you pay to get them by joining the unions....sounds like BUPA to me......
MrsB
quote:
Originally posted by Liverpoollass:
quote:
Originally posted by Lockes no 1 fan:

oh its surprising what you can fit on the front page...........about all them immigrants..benefit scroungers etc etc should I go on


Ahhh right, of course.

Glad we are back on course, i.e bashing the Daily Mail Smiler


Same old same old, could see it coming a mile off.
squiggle
quote:
Originally posted by squiggle:
quote:
Originally posted by Liverpoollass:
quote:
Originally posted by Lockes no 1 fan:

oh its surprising what you can fit on the front page...........about all them immigrants..benefit scroungers etc etc should I go on


Ahhh right, of course.

Glad we are back on course, i.e bashing the Daily Mail Smiler


Same old same old, could see it coming a mile off.


Always ends up the same, you can set your watch by it Big Grin
Liverpoollass
quote:
Originally posted by MrsB:


So you can only get the benefits if you pay to get them by joining the unions....sounds like BUPA to me......


simple fact is, if wasnt for trades unions, we would be working in all sorts of shit holes and getting paid FA,
and if anyone thinks the employers wouldve given us decent pay and working conditions out of the kindness of their hearts they are deluded,

I know there are good empolyers out there who DO care about the well being of their employees etc,(I have even worked for a couple myself)

but they are very much the minority, and I doubt even those few would be so"nice" if it wasnt for the fact that the unions have had to struggle and fight to gain these RIGHTS for the workers,
Nod
old hippy guy
quote:
Originally posted by Lockes no 1 fan:
quote:
Originally posted by electric6:
quote:
Same old same old, could see it coming a mile off.

Really, you predicted that Crunchy would make ONE joke and it would be derailed by defence?

Laugh



I am leaving this thread for a while now because it is getting hilarious........ITS A NEWSPAPER FFS Disappointed


oh i forgot one last point.......I feel that my initial question (the insulting one) has now been answered Laugh Laugh
Lockes
quote:
Originally posted by electric6:
quote:
Originally posted by Lockes no 1 fan:

I am leaving this thread for a while now because it is getting hilarious........ITS A NEWSPAPER FFS Disappointed

Indeed.

I've never seen anything quite like it, it's really, really bizarre Confused
not really hun, the thread has been dying down a couple of times and then stoked again ridiculous it is
LGS
quote:
Originally posted by Lockes no 1 fan:
quote:
Originally posted by Lockes no 1 fan:
quote:
Originally posted by electric6:
quote:
Same old same old, could see it coming a mile off.

Really, you predicted that Crunchy would make ONE joke and it would be derailed by defence?

Laugh



I am leaving this thread for a while now because it is getting hilarious........ITS A NEWSPAPER FFS Disappointed


oh i forgot one last point.......I feel that my initial question (the insulting one) has now been answered Laugh Laugh


Clapping
Liverpoollass
hahahahaaaaa. Tbh i couldnt give a s**t about politics or anything like that. I dont buy any newspaper and the only reason I would look at 1 is for the pictures of the likes of girls aloud. I have the internet to read any serious news that I find interesting.. Anyways squiggle my post was portraying labour as the evi baddies. So you should be thrilled, no?
Crunchy Nuts
quote:
Originally posted by squiggle:
So to get this thread back on course. All parties in government have had MP's who were dishonest not just the Conservatives. I suggest, as I have before, that the proper way ahead now is for us to decide this matter not on a forum but at the polling booth.


When is the earliest he can he call one squiggle, is it October?
Liverpoollass
quote:
Originally posted by Liverpoollass:
quote:
Originally posted by squiggle:
So to get this thread back on course. All parties in government have had MP's who were dishonest not just the Conservatives. I suggest, as I have before, that the proper way ahead now is for us to decide this matter not on a forum but at the polling booth.


When is the earliest he can he call one squiggle, is it October?


I think that probably would be the earliest but I think he will bottle it and hang on as long as possible. He virtually admitted in the House the other day that they will lose!
squiggle
quote:
Originally posted by old hippy guy:
quote:
Originally posted by MrsB:


So you can only get the benefits if you pay to get them by joining the unions....sounds like BUPA to me......


simple fact is, if wasnt for trades unions, we would be working in all sorts of shit holes and getting paid FA,
and if anyone thinks the employers wouldve given us decent pay and working conditions out of the kindness of their hearts they are deluded,

I know there are good empolyers out there who DO care about the well being of their employees etc,(I have even worked for a couple myself)

but they are very much the minority, and I doubt even those few would be so"nice" if it wasnt for the fact that the unions have had to struggle and fight to gain these RIGHTS for the workers,
Nod


Whilst I agree about the working conditions etc...it does seem that the unions hold non-members to ransom...and that is not very social, is it???? It is the same with all things...power corrupts...no matter which way you lean politcally.
MrsB
quote:
Originally posted by old hippy guy:
quote:
Originally posted by Big Brothers Big Scam:

odd how recollections differ isnt it, i can remember being sacked (under a labour government) not for doing a bad job or being late or even braking a dress code but for the simple fact that i refused to join a trade union and pay part of my earnings to support the labour party, i think the words to me were something along the lines of "i'm sorry but this council operates a closed shop and you have to join the union"

luckily for me thatcher got in and i was able to start my own company (with government support for the first two years) which enabled me to employ more people and make plenty of money, which i could spend on what i chose because i wasnt paying 90% in income tax as i would have been under labour, YES, 90%.


I have always been a strong supporter of trades unions, but never agreed with the "closed shop" in fact I voted against it several times in union meetings when it was proposed in places I have worked,
BUT on the other hand, if a person decides that they dont want the protection of a trades union, then from that day on, every pay increase, or holliday, or cut in working hours, or ANYTHING that the union in question gains for the work force should ONLY be for union members,

all non union members would be free to negotiate their own individual working terms and conditions,....so when the non union worker is told to take a pay cut, or work extra hours, they are on their own...and lets see how far that would get them,
ya cant have ya cake AND eat it,
and you cant have the BENEFITS of being in a union, if you are NOT in the union, Nod


nothing wrong with that i'd have happily been paid less than the union lackeys after all i would have had more leeway in negotiations as i wouldnt have to take into account the union fees taken of my union wage, i would have had the flexability to work without having to be forced out on strike every other week too which would have been attractive to the bosses and in reality in non closed shops the workers tended to get the same deals anyway, i know who i'd have got rid of first if i ever needed to lay off staff.
B
quote:
Originally posted by squiggle:


I think that probably would be the earliest but I think he will bottle it and hang on as long as possible. He virtually admitted in the House the other day that they will lose!


Only a miracle would make him call one in October, I feel. I think he is hoping that he can turn things round and the public will forget the damage him and his government have done to this country since they have been in power.
Liverpoollass

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×