quote:
Originally posted by disley21:
quote:
Originally posted by jennywren:
They have caused the damage and are very busy explaining to you how they are stemming the damage.
Part of the damage is caused by too many State-paid jobs. Not all of these jobs are necessary and they cause the country to spend a lot of money it doesn't need to spend.
However, if the Tories reduce the numbers of these jobs (to save the country money) it looks like they are deliberately putting people on the dole.
If Labour keeps these jobs (to save putting people on the dole) it looks like they are supporting the working man. This sounds more emotionally positive.
But, think about it. Which is cheaper for the nation and would help us out of the recession quicker? To pay for uncessessary jobs at ÂĢ60k a year (or whatever) or save that money, and pay less for those people to join the dole queue, or pay a visit to their local Jobcentre?
It's easy when you say it like that.
Maybe we should put you in charge of going telling people they're out of a job and they've got to go on the dole, possibly for the first time in their lives, where they then have to deal with the stigma associated with it, seeing as you clearly don't have a problem with it at all.
Better yet, try it yourself.
It is useful to be pragmatic in politics, or even take a Utilitarian view.
If the public park in your neighbourhood is full of flowers to make it look pretty, should people be allowed to pick those flowers, or dig them up, and put them in their own homes to look pretty?
After all, we all want our homes to look pretty?
The Utilitarian view is to leave the flowers in the park, because they are for everybody to enjoy, not just a self-selected few.
So it is with government. The Utilitarian view is to try to do good for the greatest number of people.
If a few people's feelings are hurt by losing their expensive government-sponsored jobs, should this be at the expense of the majority, who want to save the country money?
The problem with the Labour party, is they appeal to people's emotions. They spend a lot of money trying not to hurt people's feelings (dumbing down education, creating jobs, creating egalitarian issues which divide more than ever).
Their methods are to assume that people can't make their own decisions, so they must be told what to eat and how often, where and when to smoke, what to put in which dustbin, or whether or not they can have NHS treatment depending on how fat they are. They use emotive words to persuade the electorate of their intentions, and these emotive words fill some of the electorate with such guilt if they disagree with them, that they are persuaded the Labour Party is the only part which cares for The People. This indeed is today's mantra, famously spoken by Mrs Harmon last night. You are a Bad Person if you do not agree with Labour's policies. You are a Bad Person if you agree with Conservative policies.