Skip to main content

Replies sorted oldest to newest

It wasn't in a club. She came back stage after a gig. He knew she was a fan and he took advantage of that.

Supposed 'ignorance' of age is NO defence in law, or moral law. Or every pedo could use that excuse.

She was 14 and he had sex with her. He also owes her child support that he refuses to pay.he also refuses the dna test for fear of deportation to face the charges.


Sisqo is a pedo - the Swiss courts made the judgement.

You cannot defend what he has done unless you are saying you would do the same too?

Would you?
sushilover
A paedophile isn't someone that sleeps with someone after meeting them in a club, where you could logically assume they are over 18, only to later discover they are much younger.

A paedophile is someone who has an inherent sexual desire to sleep with children.

So you can say he had sex with a minor, but that doesn't make him a paedophile.

But I'm not surprised to see logic and reason thrown out the window here.
disley21
Reference:
A paedophile isn't someone that sleeps with someone after meeting them in a club, where you could logically assume they are over 18, only to later discover they are much younger. A paedophile is someone who has an inherent sexual desire to sleep with children. So you can say he had sex with a minor, but that doesn't make him a paedophile. But I'm not surprised to see logic and reason thrown out the window here.
I do agree with that & should have thought through what I was typing. He is a rapist instead if he did impregnate a 13yr old
Abo
Reference:
He is a rapist instead if he did impregnate a 13yr old
Disagree with that. I lost my virginity through choice at that age. He didn't know how old I was. Does not make him, or Sisqo, or any man in that position a rapist. A rapist is someone who has sex with another through force. Where it is not consensual. Rapist is not a term to be used that loosely.
Karma_
Reference:
A paedophile isn't someone that sleeps with someone after meeting them in a club, where you could logically assume they are over 18, only to later discover they are much younger. A paedophile is someone who has an inherent sexual desire to sleep with children. So you can say he had sex with a minor, but that doesn't make him a paedophile. But I'm not surprised to see logic and reason thrown out the window here.
Zackly.

The clue's in the name, really.
FM
Reference:
Disagree with that. I lost my virginity through choice at that age. He didn't know how old I was. Does not make him, or Sisqo, or any man in that position a rapist. A rapist is someone who has sex with another through force. Where it is not consensual. Rapist is not a term to be used that loosely.
Blimey Karma, stop posting reasonable thinking.
Cinds

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×