Lab, Lib, Con, DC Thomson?
See that spanner from The Spectator can't afford any legitimate advertising.
Replies sorted oldest to newest
Rupes, obviously. 
They're a bunch of shits.
I'm voting with my finger right on the pulse this time.
Motherwell Monster Ravin' Bam 
I don't care if he's on methadone.
What are we talking about?
Edit: If it's the Pope, I'm very disappointed already.
The newspaper regulation thing....I think.
Make it up as you go along col 
Originally Posted by velvet donkey:
Make it up as you go along col
Papers should say what they want.
Originally Posted by cologne 1:
Originally Posted by velvet donkey:
Make it up as you go along col
Papers should say what they want.
But only if it's true 
Originally Posted by Sprout:
Originally Posted by cologne 1:
Originally Posted by velvet donkey:
Make it up as you go along col
Papers should say what they want.
But only if it's true
this ^^^^^
Originally Posted by Sprout:
Originally Posted by cologne 1:
Originally Posted by velvet donkey:
Make it up as you go along col
Papers should say what they want.
But only if it's true
Yes, I agree, but it's easy to tell them off. I'd like to see papers doing their thing. 
Originally Posted by cologne 1:
Yes, I agree, but it's easy to tell them off. I'd like to see papers doing their thing.
Its also easy to ruin lives with lies Col and given apologies years later is not acceptable..
Originally Posted by Dame_Ann_Average:
Originally Posted by cologne 1:
Yes, I agree, but it's easy to tell them off. I'd like to see papers doing their thing.
Its also easy to ruin lives with lies Col and given apologies years later is not acceptable..
*Conkers*
Originally Posted by Dame_Ann_Average:
Originally Posted by cologne 1:
Yes, I agree, but it's easy to tell them off. I'd like to see papers doing their thing.
Its also easy to ruin lives with lies Col and given apologies years later is not acceptable..
or hiding an apology on page 28 when the "exclusive" was on the front page
Originally Posted by machel:
Originally Posted by Dame_Ann_Average:
Originally Posted by cologne 1:
Yes, I agree, but it's easy to tell them off. I'd like to see papers doing their thing.
Its also easy to ruin lives with lies Col and given apologies years later is not acceptable..
or hiding an apology on page 28 when the "exclusive" was on the front page
Exactly
Originally Posted by machel:
Originally Posted by Dame_Ann_Average:
Originally Posted by cologne 1:
Yes, I agree, but it's easy to tell them off. I'd like to see papers doing their thing.
Its also easy to ruin lives with lies Col and given apologies years later is not acceptable..
or hiding an apology on page 28 when the "exclusive" was on the front page
exactly....tell Liverpool they should have free rein 
Originally Posted by Dame_Ann_Average:
Originally Posted by machel:
Originally Posted by Dame_Ann_Average:
Originally Posted by cologne 1:
Yes, I agree, but it's easy to tell them off. I'd like to see papers doing their thing.
Its also easy to ruin lives with lies Col and given apologies years later is not acceptable..
or hiding an apology on page 28 when the "exclusive" was on the front page
exactly....tell Liverpool they should have free rein