I can`t stand Charlie.
I think he is a horrible person, and one of the worst-ever BB contestants.
I know people see things differently. For example it is both amusing and surprising that the people in the house read a situation very differently from the viewers.
I also know that opinions are subjective and that one person`s meat is another person`s poison.
But I am baffled about how some people see Charlie.
I cannot see one single redeeming feature in Charlie.
And yet some of the guests in various off-shoot programmes have described him as "a lovely boy", "very nice indeed", "genuine and dead honest", "wouldn`t hurt anyone", "doesn`t say a bad word about anybody", "a really nice fellow."
Now it seems to me that there is a wide discrepancy in what they say and what I think.
It surprises me that some people see him as a wonderful, genuine, thoughtful, honest chap, and that I do not.
Of course I think they are very bad judges and that I am right.
But I cannot see how they have formed their opinion.
I think he is a horrible person, and one of the worst-ever BB contestants.
I know people see things differently. For example it is both amusing and surprising that the people in the house read a situation very differently from the viewers.
I also know that opinions are subjective and that one person`s meat is another person`s poison.
But I am baffled about how some people see Charlie.
I cannot see one single redeeming feature in Charlie.
And yet some of the guests in various off-shoot programmes have described him as "a lovely boy", "very nice indeed", "genuine and dead honest", "wouldn`t hurt anyone", "doesn`t say a bad word about anybody", "a really nice fellow."
Now it seems to me that there is a wide discrepancy in what they say and what I think.
It surprises me that some people see him as a wonderful, genuine, thoughtful, honest chap, and that I do not.
Of course I think they are very bad judges and that I am right.
But I cannot see how they have formed their opinion.