No idea who they are?

That's like a weeks wages to him isn't it?

Not sure what to think about that. Her nobbing John Terry doesn't excuse Wayne Bridge not seeing, or paying for, his own kid.

This is one of the significant things about having sexual intercourse. There is always a chance that a child will be the product thereof, and assuming he did the deed then he is also responsible for the upbringing wheteher he dumped her or not.

Does a child really need 88k though? I think she should go out and get a job...

http://www.easier.com/66839-co...ng-child-200000.html

It would appear so.

It's small change to the average Premiership footballer. And as far as I heard, she does have a job - she's a knicker model.
Whatever her employment, Bridge should still financially support his own kid.

Well il make sure that Im never responsible for bringing any brats into this world, may save me 200k then.

It'll cost you whatever the courts think you can afford.
The days of one parent leaving another holding the baby and refusing to cough up for their own offspring's upbringing are long gone..

That's what we all said.

Thing about Vanessa is that we don’t know how often Wayne Bridge does or doesn’t see his son or how much he’s paying for his son.  If he doesn’t see him very often then you’d have to say shame on him.  We also don't know how much access he's been given or if it's only at set times.

The Courts will decide what is a fitting amount for his son but let’s be frank here, why is it just Wayne’s responsibility to provide for the little lad?  Vanessa may have been a lingerie model but I doubt she’s worked in quite some time.  What’s wrong with her going back to work and contributing for the upkeep of herself and Jaden?   Girls like her who ‘bag’ a footballer see it as a licence not to work and even when the relationship falter’s they still expect to be kept in the same standard to what they’ve  become accustomed to. 

Some men see paying for their child as also paying for the mother and with some of the settlements given in court it’s hard not to see why they are aggrieved.  Conversely, we have mothers who give everything they have and work all the hours they can because some scumbag father won’t pay.  This deprives the child of both mother and father and that's not fair either.

Obviously Wayne can afford to ensure his son lives in a nice home and has access to good schooling etc., but it should be a shared responsibility with Vanessa.  If she is staying at home and looking after him (without the aid of a nanny)  until he's in full time school then fair enough he should pay a little bit more to ensure that Vanessa doesn't have to worry financially. 

Jesus wept.

Is this where I add the old joke  "so would you if you had nails nailed into you" 

I'll get my coat

Pengy I hadn't heard that before,gotta say it's good.