It needs a title !!

Cinderella finally goes to the Ball ?? 

OMG Cinds - you live near me !!!

New title: Cindy does Cramlington

Daft question... where's that?

That isn't what I said, did I say I don't trust my husband?  

What I said was 'women' are less likely to release them. My husband actually has the best bits of our 'sex tapes' emailed to him.  

If he wants to be a dick if we ever spit up then he can fill his boots.  Like anyone would want to watch us having the sex.

Newcastle

I don't live in Cramlington.  

"Cindy does Shiney Raa!"

Hew man divven be givven it a rise.

Me Fathther (is that how one would say father in geordie) used to be a reet shiney raa bloke.

I'm going to bed.

We might or might not tape our sexy time.  Then again we might not have sexy time. Whatever happens, it will not be posted. 

G'night peeps. Shizzle.

I wasn't saying you didn't trust your husband.  I asked if you do or not...

The reason being:  You said you have full control of your 'sex tapes' and I just wondered why your husband hadn't.  In your original post, you never mentioned that he had 'the best bits' of them emailed to him.  

I was asking if you don't fully trust him to release stuff if you broke up, BEFORE you said 'he has bits of the sex tapes too that I have emailed to him.'  You didn't mention that in the post I responded to.  My comments to you were based on what you originally said; that YOU are in control of the sex tapes.  You didn't mention he had anything at all at that point.  

If yer rememba wid aalready done wor "Cindy does Darras (Hall)" jest.

I don't think she's done herself any favours by initially getting her people to lie about the tape's existence and claim it was "100% fake"...

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/cul...0pc-fake-denial.html

I agree.

It means Tulisa is a liar, a sleaze bucket . . . AND a bad singer!!!

I'd say that it was worth a try.

She hasn't done anything illegal here.

sleaze bucket ? 

Two outta three ain't bad.

Maybe Renton has 'issues' with sex? 

im looking at the stills now-across them is written *nottulisa*

Never enough - small willy - i could go on

I saw that.  Maybe she had 'nottulisa'  put on when she was in the process of  denying it was her.  I bet nobody thought it WAS her til that went on!  LOL!

I'm sorry I don't buy that one. In fact I think that it should be made a criminal offence. It's one thing filming a bit of private intimate fun with your partner, but unless both parties agree to release it then that is where it should stay. It doesn't say much for the type of immature scratter males we have today does it?

Of course in my day it was restricted to a better class of person.

Have you all watched it then?

I ain't.

Stabbed in the back.

Ewwwww.  

Not clapped eyes on it  

TBH - those who appear to have big issues with this are the ones who've taken time to look at the tape. It hasn't crossed my mind to click on the link - I'm not interested and the names she's being called for simply trusting a former lover are quite unbelievable. I can usually see two sides to an argument but I'm a bit  at some of the attitudes on here.

Maybe he has sex with tissues.

looks more like dappy

would you like a link to the download?

lol

Well Strictly speaking, I don't disagree... But unfortunately, there IS no rule or law stopping people releasing private and intimate sex tapes ... and that is the main reason I would never do it.  Anyhoo, I am repeating myself again and again, so I shall STFU, and gracefully say Ta-ra for now.  I'm logging off for the night.  Once again, no offence intended to anyone... I appreciate everyone's responses and thanks to everyone for your contribution folks. See you soon.  

i've never had any complaints

I'm asleep anyway 

Absobloodylutely! 

*** votes for Joe *** 

Oh no: nothing illegal. However she does come across as a bit of a hypocrite as a result. She's now criticizing Justin Edwards for "pretending it's not him on the tape when it is" (see article linked above), while conveniently forgetting that she did exactly the same thing...

Me too, Soozy.

And I would never want to watch anything like that if it hasn't been released with the consent of those involved. To me, that would be joining in the abuse, tbh. 

i had a look

dunno if it makes me a perv or nosey, or indeed a nosey perv

but anyway, its not her, i dont think

and not sure if i care really

i wouldnt recognise her if it wasnt for the fact she's in cheryls rightful seat

lol

X FACTOR

and he did

havent read all the thread so if anyone else made that crap joke first..sorry

Oh its her - she admitted it

If they'd both done something wrong, then I would agree with you.

In this case, I don't blame her for trying to deny that it was her and, seeing as he was the one who released the footage, I do blame him, firstly for releasing it and secondly for then being a coward and denying that it was him.

oh ok

didnt see that mate

well there you go

dearie me what on earth is going on with todays *famous* people?

you wouldnt have got katie boyle doing that in the 1950's

maybe in the 1970's

but not the 1950's