Originally Posted by Syd:
Originally Posted by Carnelian:
I see Baroness Warsi, the Tories' token Asian, spouting the usual lazy guff about a broken society and responsibility.
FFS, it's her party that wanted to cut sentences, cut police and have stoked all this up. It's her party that is the most materialist of parties and the party that said there was no such thing as society.
She's now trying to blame Labour for a generation of rioters. Pathetic!
She's a bloody moron, she thinks (or rather would like the viewer to think) a politician wagging their finger about social responsibility is going to stop people rioting.
politics.......they are all much of a muchness, those fighting for the title peeps..........
You're right Syd, but you can't spout materialism and the individual for 30 years and then expect the have nots to have ignored that message and just settle for their lot.
You can, but in essence, the Tory ideal is that it requires the target audience (the selfish, relatively powerful, upper middle class, affluent) to take in the message, and the non-target audience (the poor, low waged, unemployed) to ignore the message and just accept their lot, be salt-of-the-earth and just pick up the slack of government that's abdicating its responsibility - as in Cameron's 'big society'.
The problem is, what if both socio economic groups take in the message? What if 'every man for himself', resonates with poor kids who want a large flat screen TV as much as it resonates with the middle classes who buy up BTLs to keep others out of the market or make sure their kids get to go to the best funded state schools?
There's no point ramming materialism down people's throats, as our politicians and media are absolutely guilty of, and expecting those who can't afford material things to not be materialist and plan to get those things through criminality. Of course, I'm not saying everyone who can't afford things is going to turn to crime, but never the less, the message of every man for himself materialism inspires that behaviour in enough people to create riots.