I'm sick of the noms, allowing people to talk really allows block voting thus giving some HMs an advantage over the others. I'm also sick of people breaking the talking about noms rule. So, as I have suggested before, go for a three strikes and your out rule. BB has tried everything else and it hasn't worked so they might as well start turfing people out. I also think that if they do this there should be no interview, no BBLB, and no BBBM, just send them home with nothing.
Replies sorted oldest to newest
Nothing but the shame
quote:Originally posted by Mentalist:
I'm sick of the noms, allowing people to talk really allows block voting thus giving some HMs an advantage over the others. I'm also sick of people breaking the talking about noms rule. So, as I have suggested before, go for a three strikes and your out rule. BB has tried everything else and it hasn't worked so they might as well start turfing people out. I also think that if they do this there should be no interview, no BBLB, and no BBBM, just send them home with nothing.
There would be nobody left by next week, except Roddy!!
quote:Originally posted by Mentalist:
I'm sick of the noms, allowing people to talk really allows block voting thus giving some HMs an advantage over the others. I'm also sick of people breaking the talking about noms rule. So, as I have suggested before, go for a three strikes and your out rule. BB has tried everything else and it hasn't worked so they might as well start turfing people out. I also think that if they do this there should be no interview, no BBLB, and no BBBM, just send them home with nothing.
i totally agree with you.
I'm hoping for a big twist this time. Otherwise they might just as well tear up the rule book and just let them get on with it.
quote:Originally posted by Moomin:quote:Originally posted by Mentalist:
I'm sick of the noms, allowing people to talk really allows block voting thus giving some HMs an advantage over the others. I'm also sick of people breaking the talking about noms rule. So, as I have suggested before, go for a three strikes and your out rule. BB has tried everything else and it hasn't worked so they might as well start turfing people out. I also think that if they do this there should be no interview, no BBLB, and no BBBM, just send them home with nothing.
There would be nobody left by next week, except Roddy!!
He'll still be paranoid about being put up for eviction!quote:Originally posted by captain marbles:
I'm hoping for a big twist this time. Otherwise they might just as well tear up the rule book and just let them get on with it.
There has to be a twist, surely.
quote:Originally posted by Mentalist:quote:Originally posted by Moomin:quote:Originally posted by Mentalist:
I'm sick of the noms, allowing people to talk really allows block voting thus giving some HMs an advantage over the others. I'm also sick of people breaking the talking about noms rule. So, as I have suggested before, go for a three strikes and your out rule. BB has tried everything else and it hasn't worked so they might as well start turfing people out. I also think that if they do this there should be no interview, no BBLB, and no BBBM, just send them home with nothing.
There would be nobody left by next week, except Roddy!!
Ha ha - yes!!
if there is no twist, i shall wash my hands of BB. 
it will be hard but i will give it my best shot. no really
it will be hard but i will give it my best shot. no really
With so many walkers, turfing people out will cost them money in terms of voting revenue.
The ONLY way is to reduce the prize money in multiples of AT LEAST 10K a time. That'll stop them all in their tracks
The ONLY way is to reduce the prize money in multiples of AT LEAST 10K a time. That'll stop them all in their tracks
quote:Originally posted by evviva!:
With so many walkers, turfing people out will cost them money in terms of voting revenue.
The ONLY way is to reduce the prize money in multiples of AT LEAST 10K a time. That'll stop them all in their tracks
it will indeed, and it will also show us who is really wanting the money. oh no they are all in it for the experience arent they.
quote:Originally posted by mozart:quote:Originally posted by evviva!:
With so many walkers, turfing people out will cost them money in terms of voting revenue.
The ONLY way is to reduce the prize money in multiples of AT LEAST 10K a time. That'll stop them all in their tracks
it will indeed, and it will also show us who is really wanting the money. oh no they are all in it for the experience arent they.
Course they are
And to make new friends. AND to go on a personal journey to learn about themselves.......and stuff like that...... 
quote:Originally posted by evviva!:
With so many walkers, turfing people out will cost them money in terms of voting revenue.
The ONLY way is to reduce the prize money in multiples of AT LEAST 10K a time. That'll stop them all in their tracks
You are soooooo much more evil than me
I love it!
Isn't there a BB that has that principle? BB Australia or summat
quote:Originally posted by evviva!:quote:Originally posted by mozart:quote:Originally posted by evviva!:
With so many walkers, turfing people out will cost them money in terms of voting revenue.
The ONLY way is to reduce the prize money in multiples of AT LEAST 10K a time. That'll stop them all in their tracks
it will indeed, and it will also show us who is really wanting the money. oh no they are all in it for the experience arent they.
Course they are
Blah...blah...blah
quote:Originally posted by Mentalist:
You are soooooo much more evil than me
Who me?
I am the most serenest, easy going and placid of all puddy tats, me.Just don't deliberately tread on my tail!
quote:Originally posted by evviva!:quote:Originally posted by Mentalist:
You are soooooo much more evil than me
Who me?
Just don't deliberately tread on my tail!
Sorry but
I don't think even the money decreasing will stop them. They are after the other prize.. their 15 minutes of fame.
So, what I would do if I were BB would be to strictly enforce the rule that there is to be no noms talk. There would be no second chances and my word would be final.
Punishment would be immediate removal from the house. No pomp, no ceremony, no interview, nothing. Just collect your bag and go.
I would also include in their contract a clause which stated that, should they be removed from the show in this way, they will be unable to take part in any publicity and put a gagging clause in there to prevent any interviews or peddling their story to the media. .. or something to that effect.
Hit them where it really hurts it. That'd tighten their flapping little gums.
So, what I would do if I were BB would be to strictly enforce the rule that there is to be no noms talk. There would be no second chances and my word would be final.
Punishment would be immediate removal from the house. No pomp, no ceremony, no interview, nothing. Just collect your bag and go.
I would also include in their contract a clause which stated that, should they be removed from the show in this way, they will be unable to take part in any publicity and put a gagging clause in there to prevent any interviews or peddling their story to the media. .. or something to that effect.
Hit them where it really hurts it. That'd tighten their flapping little gums.