Skip to main content

Perhaps the man's nationality WAS important.  Would the yobs have gone for him if he were "one of their own"?

There are attacks every day all over the country that are down to race, religion, creed and sexuality.  To deny that they exist is to hide your head in the sand.

But that's kind of my point - in all of the stories I have read on this particular case there does not seem to be any thing to suggest the attack was motivated by race and that is why I belive mentioning his race is not needed.  A tourist would have sufficed, for me by mentioning his race they are almost trying to make an issue of it when there really shouldn't be.
P
It's the same when something tragic happens to a British person abroad - they are reported as being British, Scottish, whatever.

If reported in the native country of that person it is slightly different as it does add something to the story.  In this case in India if reported I suspect they would mention he was a native which makes sense and is a big aspect of the story in India - here it adds nothing to the story.
P
I really am severely struggling pp to figure out why you have a problem with people mentioning he was Indian.  You're making something out of nowt IMO.  And as i said earlier, I think people who do this (look for problems where there actually arent any,) cause more trouble than the people who had the audacity to mention someone happened to be Indian.  Its like the people making a fuss out of folk mentioning someones race are purposely trying to cause conflict. 
FM
Reference:
really am severely struggling pp to figure out why you have a problem with people mentioning he was Indian.  You're making something out of nowt IMO.


The guy was probably proud of his race/county, likewise I'm proud to be British.... More's the pity that the thread seems to have wandered off what was a disgusting act of violence that everyone was in agreement with 
Dame_Ann_Average
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×