There has been some discussion during this series (as usual) about hiding stuff (usually food), keeping a private store rather than sharing, and deliberately and knowingly stealing.
Now some are saying "there is no proof" so there should be no accusations or assumptions.
Does this mean that the only way `to catch a thief` is to catch them red-handed? This would be unlikely.
So the thefts continue....
BB would not intervene if it was just a theft of food, and so it goes on..
From his whispered conversation with Lisa and his over-reaction when in denial, I think David has taken what is not his by agreement.
We know that Charlie (and Kris) have stolen and stored lager for themselves.
Can anybody remember cases of theft in previous series` of Big Brother?
Can you recall if someone has regularly got away with it?
Can you recall if a housemate has been caught red-handed?
Or can you recall if the culprit has been cleverly tracked down?
Now some are saying "there is no proof" so there should be no accusations or assumptions.
Does this mean that the only way `to catch a thief` is to catch them red-handed? This would be unlikely.
So the thefts continue....
BB would not intervene if it was just a theft of food, and so it goes on..
From his whispered conversation with Lisa and his over-reaction when in denial, I think David has taken what is not his by agreement.
We know that Charlie (and Kris) have stolen and stored lager for themselves.
Can anybody remember cases of theft in previous series` of Big Brother?
Can you recall if someone has regularly got away with it?
Can you recall if a housemate has been caught red-handed?
Or can you recall if the culprit has been cleverly tracked down?