is in no way as bad as what happened with Dennis last year, yes it is still gross, but Dennis was done in pure anger, Charlie is just a numpty who took a prank too far.
Replies sorted oldest to newest
Agreed.
But Charlie does need to be called-up by BB because his 'pranks' are often unacceptable to HMs but he ignores their reaction and blithely carries on with the next one.
But Charlie does need to be called-up by BB because his 'pranks' are often unacceptable to HMs but he ignores their reaction and blithely carries on with the next one.
quote:Originally posted by love greek sunsets:
is in no way as bad as what happened with Dennis last year, yes it is still gross, but Dennis was done in pure anger, Charlie is just a numpty who took a prank too far.
this.
It's not the same motivation, but the outcome is.
No, it wasn't in the same league, but if it had been me on the receiving end, I would have puked.
It was completely wrong thing to do though, and I don't blame Bea for being cross. Alot bit of me couldn't help thinking it couldn't have been received by a more deserving candidate though!
Oh. and I do think Charlie should be pulled up by BB on it.
It was completely wrong thing to do though, and I don't blame Bea for being cross. A
Oh. and I do think Charlie should be pulled up by BB on it.
dennis spat at mo in the middle of a heated argument, in order to humiliate mo.
can't think charlie set out to humiliate bea,just being a prat, but the result is the same, a face covered in some one else's saliva and snot etc.
can't think charlie set out to humiliate bea,just being a prat, but the result is the same, a face covered in some one else's saliva and snot etc.
quote:Originally posted by love greek sunsets:
is in no way as bad as what happened with Dennis last year, yes it is still gross, but Dennis was done in pure anger, Charlie is just a numpty who took a prank too far.
Agree LGS,(Good to see you back)
We were discussing this on the forum last night whilst the incident happened. It's funny because after watching the HL I put up a thread stating that BB need to give Charlie a warning for his goading beahviour.
I agree its not on the same level as Dennis but his behaviour is extremely provocative and is designed to get a rise out of people.quote:Originally posted by Senora Reyes:quote:Originally posted by love greek sunsets:
is in no way as bad as what happened with Dennis last year, yes it is still gross, but Dennis was done in pure anger, Charlie is just a numpty who took a prank too far.
Agree LGS,(Good to see you back)
We were discussing this on the forum last night whilst the incident happened. It's funny because after watching the HL I put up a thread stating that BB need to give Charlie a warning for his goading beahviour.
Its about time he got an official warning its only a matter of time till he goads someone into doing something in retaliation that will land them in deep trouble while he professes that hes once again "done nothing wrong".
If this had been Marcus I could see crys of disgusting get him out etc.
Wonder what his excuse wil be today then.....?
No way as bad as Dennis.However I still think it merits an official warning.I'd have snacked him one if he'd done it to me.
That is very true, but I still think BB need to have words. He obviously thinks he can do whatever he likes without repercussions! 
Just as bad as poking someone in the face
It was disgusting - yes
but deep down were we happy it was at Bea? LOL
but deep down were we happy it was at Bea? LOL
quote:Originally posted by RENTON:
It was disgusting - yes
but deep down were we happy it was at Bea? LOL
have to agree Renton, she had better get used to it
quote:Originally posted by RENTON:
It was disgusting - yes
but deep down were we happy it was at Bea? LOL
TBH, spitting is spitting and is unacceptable behaviour, the motives behind the action don't really come into it.
Agreed! Charlie's actions didn't have Dennis' motives, but if you add his spitting incident to the deliberate goading of Rodrigo, then surely there's a case for removing him. His behaviour has been ignored throughout the entire series...time it was dealt with properly.
I say this in hope rather than expectation
Agreed! Charlie's actions didn't have Dennis' motives, but if you add his spitting incident to the deliberate goading of Rodrigo, then surely there's a case for removing him. His behaviour has been ignored throughout the entire series...time it was dealt with properly.
I say this in hope rather than expectation
Sharing bodily fluids is, imo, something that should be done with the consent of both parties.
I didn't see what happened. But surely if he spat at someone and the last person who did it was evicted; he should be evicted too?quote:Originally posted by love greek sunsets:
is in no way as bad as what happened with Dennis last year, yes it is still gross, but Dennis was done in pure anger, Charlie is just a numpty who took a prank too far.
spitting is spitting if it causes offense its wrong and nasty
Yeah but it was BEA, lol
quote:Originally posted by Cheeky-Pixie:I didn't see what happened. But surely if he spat at someone and the last person who did it was evicted; he should be evicted too?quote:Originally posted by love greek sunsets:
is in no way as bad as what happened with Dennis last year, yes it is still gross, but Dennis was done in pure anger, Charlie is just a numpty who took a prank too far.
He had a mouthful of water which he squirted over her ..........i suppose it is like spitting but more like the pranks schoolboys play IMO. It was.'t a snotty gob lobbed in malicious anger.