Reference:
I have finished it at last ... I did enjoy it ... as you say Twee, it is fast and pacy and keeps you intrigued enough to want to keep turning the pages ... Don't want to say too much and risk giving away the plot to anyone still reading it, but I did think it was well-constructed and very well researched and not as all over the place as The Da Vinci Code was ... Brown maintains that everything in the book is based on fact ... Although how you can establish fact from all the conspiracy theories about the Masons is a bit beyond me ... Still, that doesn't take away from the entertainment value ... and it was intriguing to have the book set in Washington D.C., with the references to famous landmarks and the suggestions of the various layers of secrecy and conspiracy that permeate to the very highest levels ... And I do believe Dan Brown's quality of writing may actually be improving ... I was actually quite impressed ... Did he really write it himself I wonder ...? Conspiracies, conspiracies ....
hi Shar. I am glad you have now finished the book. It seems we both agree that Dan Brown's writing style has improved. I found this book much easier to follow than his other 2 books that I have read (DaVinci and Digital Fortress). I just think that he has slowed down the pace somewhat, but has still maintained an exciting flow to the story. I too loved the fact that he set the book in Washington with less frenetic running about on planes, etc., all over Europe. He uses a work of art to explain the symbols, and this square is actually on the Durer engraving/painting, although I am not sure if DBs interpretation was the original intention of the artist
Equally, all the artefacts in Washington DC that he mentions
are there, but he puts his own interpretation on what they mean. I love that artistic licence that he uses to tell a story. I particularly liked the Washington Monument reference, but I won't say more for fear of spoiling the story for others. All in all, Dan Brown has excelled himself and his sales have gone off the scale. This time it is deserved imo.
He has used a lot of hearsay with regard to the Masons but, again, DB uses unproven rumours to substantiate his story in a very clever way. It is all rather intriguing as a subject and he makes us wonder as he relates little snippets that are already in the public domain but we may not be aware of them. I know his wife Blythe does all the research for his books, but I'm sure he has written this book himself as the style is similar to DaVinci, just less frenetic.