Skip to main content

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Reference:
True
Not true.

The actual name was Oliver then Jack or summat...however, the right wing press decided that if they took every different version of Mohammed and added them all together then it would be Mohammed.

But if I took every different version of "Jack" e.g Jackson, Jacques, Jacson...or if you wanna be a reet tit about it John (as Jack is a John derivative) then Jack remains above Mohammed. Just using "Oliver" and "Ollie" ALONE (no other derivates) puts it BACK ABOVE Mohammed.

Added to that Mohammed (or a variation of) is THE most common name given to Muslim boys, a huuuuge percentage of Muslims give their first born boys the name Mohammed-then another name as a middle name which the kid will commonly be known by.  No such tradition exists in the UK...this also skews the figures.

People who are cleverer than me can explain better.

    http://enemiesofreason.co.uk/2...ng-over-or-are-they/
http://nosleeptilbrooklands.bl...meds-are-coming.html
Leccy
Reference:
Just the press trying to wind us all up really! If you fall for it then more fool you...if you saw through their scam then, kudos to you
LTNS!

Innit.

Any case, even if there were 10 Mohammeds to every nursery class, a name is just a name *drifts off into Romeo and Juliet land*

I had a "Damien Lucifer" in my class, he was a little sweetheart and happy as a pig in shite, as we say up here.
Leccy
Reference Leccy Endellion 11,259 Forum PostsYesterday at 23:38:
In any case, you need 12 different versions of Mohammed to arrive at "Mohammed is the most common name" (7,549) and only 2 versions of Oliver/Ollie to arrive at Oliver/Ollie as the top name(7,875)
Now that is interesting...

When you really look at it, the most interesting thing about this "names" list is that it clearly shows how common shortened names and derivatives/unusual spellings have become.

Remember: it used to be the case that you weren't allowed to register a shortened name. For example, "Alfie" (4th on this year's list) and Charlie (7th) would have had to have been registered as "Alfred" and "Charles" respectively (and of course the same would have applied to Ollie/Oliver).
If anything, it's this "diversification" that's caused a number of "classic" names to slip down the table...
Eugene's Lair
Last edited by Eugene's Lair
Hello EL

*I wrote a big long post then pressed back by accident and lost it*

The gist was...I recall there is/was some Euro country where names have to be picked from an approved list...urban myth maybe? (I was much better in my original post )

Plus we can cherry pick "facts"  trad. Irish and Welsh names are increasingly common, if we took into account every spelling variation, shortened version and derivative we could, if we wanted to, say that there was a huuuuge Taff army hell bent on the "Welshification" of England.

*Here is where I waffled a bit more and made more sense*

*Here is where I said hello to Blizz and K*  

*Here is where I waffled a bit more and made less sense but knew what I meant and said if "approved" versions only were used the results would be heavily skewed in favour of so-called traditional "British" names...and then waffled that "British" names were nothing of the sort.
Leccy
My neighbour is a Miriam, and she is dead scary!  


In my parents' day, you had to have a Christian name, i.e. Biblical, or a saint's name, to be christened.  Naming children after their parents, and grandparents etc. was also traditional. Lots of my older relatives were never known by their first names, as they weren't really the chosen names, but were deemed appropriate for various reasons.
Blizz'ard

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×