Skip to main content

I know I don't join in live  but can I just comment on Sophie and her bluddy tattoo..  she wears a lovely outfit, does a fab dance but has a dirty great tattoo on her arm that just looks so out of place .. was even worse last week with the floaty waltz dress..   if she was dressed as a biker or a rocker then yeah maybe it's fine as tattoos go more with the dirty scruffy look..  but there is nothing more disgusting looking than a girl in a fab outfit with tattoos visible.. they also all look so dirty, as in a dirty faded blue colour on TV  and in pics..

 

Feel the same whenever I see women in wedding dresses or ball gowns all completely spoiled by horrible huge visible tattoos. . it's so wrong. .if you must have them get them where they can't be seen normally or don;t wear fancy clothes cos they are just spoilt by a dirty great tattoo

 

rant over..

Mount Olympus *Olly*

Hi Olly - I have to agree.   OK, it's up to everyone to decide what they want to do with their body, but I do think in this it detracts from the beauty of the dance.  I thought Dani Harmer was even worse last year though.. such a dainty pretty little dancer and she had huge tatts up the back of her calves that looked like bruises - really spoiled some of the dances for me.

 

My niece was one of those brides btw... was adamant when she was 18 that she wouldn't regret the horrible tribal thing on her arm and ended up having to buy a wedding dress with a bolero jacket because by then she thought it looked awful with a dress.   Now in her 30s she's a constant problem buying outfits for 'posh' dos and weddings.

Kaffs

yeah Kaffy it is up to individuals but it does make me wonder what they are thinking as they must have seen other people with visible tattoos in otherwise fab outfits ruining the complete look. .

 

I remember those calf tattoos too.. they may look like great artwork close up but most people see the tattoos on others from a distance and most of them look like dirty muddy marks or as you say huge bruises.. half the time they make an otherwise pretty girl look pretty ugly..   

Mount Olympus *Olly*
Originally Posted by Pengy:
Originally Posted by Baz:
I agree about the tattoos ! I kept thinking yesterday that they could have given her a flapper armlet to cover it up ! I found it very distracting !

wonder why they can't put a shed load of foundation on it to cover it???  I'm sure that's what actresses do when they have tatts 

There is make you can get to cover scarring and birthmarks which would cover the tatts.

Yogi19

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×