Skip to main content

quote:
Originally posted by Cold Sweat:
quote:
Originally posted by Mazzystar:
She is not a wanker.Her duvet has no stains Thumbs Up



She is,however,a thick shit stirring beeeeeeeeeeeeatch!


Sophie is one of the least bitchy and least shit stirring housemates currently still in the house - which could explain why she is 2nd favourite to win Big Brother.

I feel if there was strong evidence to use against her in this regard, there would be fewer bitchy comments about her weight on this thread.



Luke was favourite to win BB right up until his eviction Laugh
Lockes
quote:
Originally posted by old hippy guy:
quote:
Originally posted by fracas:
quote:
Originally posted by old hippy guy:
IF I may interject....I am the creator of the ORIGINAL WANKER thread, the now famous, "the Kris is a WANKER thread"
the PURPOSE of MY thread was to be a place of refuge for frustrated anti Kris folks a sort of "relief station" if you you like, so that when at anytime, either in a thread or on LF or the HL show, you felt you would just BURST if you didnt shout WANKER at the top of your voice, (aimed at Kris of course)
then in you popped IN had a quick WANKER!!! WANKY WANK WANKER!!!
then popped out again feeling a lot better,
and it wasnt, to indulge in arguments and rows about who deserves the name or who doesnt, simple rule was if you DIDNT think Kris is a WANKER then there were other threads for you, but it was FUTILE to come into the "the Kris is a WANKER thread"
and try to sway people from that opinion, cause if they didnt think that way....they wouldnt BE THERE,
just my thoughts, Big Grin Thumbs Up


This is different, Sophie is quite fat Nod

Different.


HAHA BEST REPLY EVER, Laugh Laugh


I just use logic, mostly Wink
fracas
I've said she gives off bad vibes, and today on the HLs someone mentioned exactly that. Some funniness can't really compensate for it.

Now she's using the old Siavash ploy of wanting to be put up to prove her actions right in some way. Of course eviction surivival has nothing to do with proving a HM is right in the house in any particular thing, but she is using this fake Siavash argument anyway.
Free Thinking
quote:
Originally posted by Lockes no 1 fan:
quote:
Originally posted by Cold Sweat:
quote:
Originally posted by Mazzystar:
She is not a wanker.Her duvet has no stains Thumbs Up



She is,however,a thick shit stirring beeeeeeeeeeeeatch!


Sophie is one of the least bitchy and least shit stirring housemates currently still in the house - which could explain why she is 2nd favourite to win Big Brother.

I feel if there was strong evidence to use against her in this regard, there would be fewer bitchy comments about her weight on this thread.



Luke was favourite to win BB right up until his eviction Laugh


I thought that Luke's odds had taken quite a dramatic crash a while before he was evicted...
Cold Sweat
quote:
Originally posted by Free Thinking:
I've said she gives off bad vibes, and today on the HLs someone mentioned exactly that. Some funniness can't really compensate for it.

Now she's using the old Siavash ploy of wanting to be put up to prove her actions right in some way. Of course eviction surivival has nothing to do with proving a HM is right in the house in any particular thing, but she is using this fake Siavash argument anyway.


Freddie never got the chance to explain his 'bad vibes' comment. However, he did assure Charlie that it wasn't anything negative in regard to Sophie.
Cold Sweat
quote:
Originally posted by Cold Sweat:
quote:
Originally posted by Free Thinking:
I've said she gives off bad vibes, and today on the HLs someone mentioned exactly that. Some funniness can't really compensate for it.

Now she's using the old Siavash ploy of wanting to be put up to prove her actions right in some way. Of course eviction surivival has nothing to do with proving a HM is right in the house in any particular thing, but she is using this fake Siavash argument anyway.


Freddie never got the chance to explain his 'bad vibes' comment. However, he did assure Charlie that it wasn't anything negative in regard to Sophie.




Ya right.
Tayto.
quote:
Originally posted by Eugene's Lair:
quote:
Originally posted by skive:
I apologise for only skimming but did anyone actually come up with a collective noun for wankers or not?

I need to know. Ninja

Alan Clark is credited with the term "a bolus of wankers" in his diaries (link).

However, others have suggested "palm". (Collective Nouns)


Both worthy considerations. However I am looking for something with more impact; a more visceral summation of the collective state of wankerness if you like. Skull
skive
quote:
Originally posted by fracas:
quote:
Both worthy considerations. However I am looking for something with more impact; a more visceral summation of the collective state of wankerness if you like.



A spurt of wankers?


Much better. Clapping

Although a non-gender specific word that is therefore inclusive and can be applied universally would be the ideal.

No pressure like but I'm relying on you now fracas. Nod
skive
quote:
Originally posted by fracas:
quote:
Originally posted by skive:


Although a non-gender specific word that is therefore inclusive and can be applied universally would be the ideal.

No pressure like but I'm relying on you now fracas. Nod


A tremble?


Hmm. Too delicate. Wanking by its nature is a primeval impulse. We need something more grunting!

Big Grin
skive
quote:
Originally posted by skive:
quote:
Originally posted by mathom:
quote:
Originally posted by mathom:
A clutch, surely?


Mine was the best Mad


A worthy contender mathom but you've got to admit it wasn't as non-gender specific as I was looking for. Ninja


I would disagree; a clutch of eggs, a clutch of handbags, a clutch of whatever one can clutch... you see this now, I think.
mathom
quote:
Originally posted by skive:
quote:
Originally posted by mathom:
I would disagree; a clutch of eggs, a clutch of handbags, a clutch of whatever one can clutch... you see this now, I think.


Yes but in terms of wanking one can only clutch if one has an appendage big enough to...well...clutch!

Ninja


I see; I was taking a more lateral view on the female collective nouns.
mathom

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×