yeah you are right, i know she was in the wrong too but i feel if he was going to play away he would have done it, if not with her then with another. I only feel really bad for the wife and kids tbh.
Well it's Murdochs rags etc that thrive on this sort of stuff,so they may fund Imogen etc.
Originally Posted by Videostar:
I still cant believe any of you actually believed her side of events in the first place, all this nonsense that "he told her he loved her and that he was going to run away with her", shes either lying to gain support and sympathy (plus a shit load of tabloid cash) or shes the DUMBEST woman ever to come out of Wales.
I kind of agree with you Vid, and know where you're coming from, but mistresses believing the flannel that the married man comes out with is very common; they will tell them ANYthing in order to have an affair with them. And SOMEtimes they are so desperate for a relationship with that man, that they do genuinely believe him. Imogen really is dumb though IMO and probably did believe everything this dude said, (she is daft enough and naive enough.)
But she went into a relationship with a married man (and a rich one at that,) and she should have know that at the end of the day, she would be second best to his wife and family. And she MUST have known that because she is kind of famous and he is famous too, that the press would have a field day with it. IMO, all the is pissed off about is the fact that she can't make trillions of pennies from the tabloids with her tacky little kiss-and-tell story.
I can understand people feeling a bit sorry for her because she does come across as genuinely hurt, but I do believe that she knew what she was getting herself into, and she is just sore because she can't make money from the story. Everyone knows who the footballer is anyway, so I don't know why she is kicking up such a fuss!!!
Regardless, Imogen looks pretty hot in an ice queen kind of way, in this outfit
Originally Posted by Aquarius:
Originally Posted by spongebob squarepants:
rumours i've read are ryan giggs or robbie keane
Have you seen Robbie Keane's wife? She's really gorgeous! I don't get it.
Mind you, she looks like she could pack a punch if provoked.
If it was Ryan Giggs I'd be really, really shocked ~ Mr Squeaky Clean!
Claudene Keane is hot
, not only that she has brains and a degree in Business and Finance.
Must admit i'll be disappointed if it is Giggsy even though Imogen is hot, wouldn't change my opinion of him at playing football but as a person my opinion of him will be a bit different than before. His wife is pretty too and looked happy out with him last night at the United player of the year awards
.
Reports on online gooner that another married footballer (England International) has got a super injunction. Interestingly he got it with the woman he's allegedly been having an affair with.
Obviously one of their 'friends' had decided to sell the story to make a few bob but whoever the woman is she wants to keep her privacy.
I'm with GJoe on the smokescreen effect of all this carp. The real agenda I believe is to get the courts used to handing out these super injunctions (which are not really based on any law) for celebs caught with their pants down so that they will be handing them out when politicians/Royals/business leaders etc are up to far more serious wrongdoing than dipping their wicks.
She should have known better than to get involved with a married man, and for that she is partly to blame, though it was him (whoever he is) who made promises to his wife when he married her, so should really take the responsibility, Imogen never made any promises to his wife....and I would put money on the fact he would have cheated on his missus regardless of imogen... 
Originally Posted by Veggieburger:
Reports on online gooner that another married footballer (England International) has got a super injunction. Interestingly he got it with the woman he's allegedly been having an affair with.
Obviously one of their 'friends' had decided to sell the story to make a few bob but whoever the woman is she wants to keep her privacy.
I'm with GJoe on the smokescreen effect of all this carp. The real agenda I believe is to get the courts used to handing out these super injunctions (which are not really based on any law) for celebs caught with their pants down so that they will be handing them out when politicians/Royals/business leaders etc are up to far more serious wrongdoing than dipping their wicks.
Privacy law by the back door.
Newsnight talking about this just now
Painful though it may be, I'm with the Max Mosley party on this.
I have no interest in the interest of the public, but have interest in the public interest. 
Interesting that the former head of the Royal Bank of Scotland "Fred the shred" also had a super injunction in place.However he was named in the house of Lords,and he lifted the injuction over his affair with a senior member of staff.
Originally Posted by Carnelian:
Regardless, Imogen looks pretty hot in an ice queen kind of way, in this outfit
Is it just me that thinks the dress looks a size too small? Its too tight in the wrong places and bunched up
She's had the boobs done since BB, and they're a few sizes bigger than would suit her. Seeing her on This Morning, I thought she'd aged quite a lot considering it's only five years since BB7. Looking a bit pouchy and puffy in the face these days. Too many footballers late nights.
The footballer involved is now suing Twitter! and some of their users
What a joke. As if most of the UK don't already know who he is. 
Can Twitter say who is suing them?
They could, but they might regret it 
Apparently this bloke has already confessed all to his wife, who was getting suspicious. So all he's now really trying to protect are his lucrative image rights. Sponsors might not be so keen if his "family man" image is proven to be a load of bollox..
bit of an og there by giggs....it's his name plastered all over twitter......and now the 'mystery footballer' is suing twitter for having his name mentioned all over the site!!...kind of defeats the anonimity there ryan!!
He should have kept his daffodil in his pants.
Wonder if he has the dosh to sue Twitter and Facebook oh and Google....
Originally Posted by spongebob squarepants:
bit of an og there by giggs....it's his name plastered all over twitter......and now the 'mystery footballer' is suing twitter for having his name mentioned all over the site!!...kind of defeats the anonimity there ryan!!
It's what's known as the "Streisand effect":
It was Ryan Giggs? NOOOOO!
Sezit that pic is ace!
I know. Hahahaha..........I nicked it from F.B.
Well its really funny.
well, its finally out, cause an mp thought it wasnt feasable to imprison 75000 twitter users
I know CC. Well done him I say. 
So the MPs can talk about it in the houses of parliament then> ?? What a pile of bollox! One rule for one and all that poo!
Sparkles, he did it using the "Parliamentry privilage law" where they can say what the heck they like and not ever be prosecuted. The speaker was very cross with him and give him a telling off, but it was too late he couldn't take his words back.
At least the twitters can calm down now. We can all point and say 'Ryan Giggs'.
Originally Posted by Sezit:
Sparkles, he did it using the "Parliamentry privilage law" where they can say what the heck they like and not ever be prosecuted. The speaker was very cross with him and give him a telling off, but it was too late he couldn't take his words back.
MPs get away with a LOT don't they? GRRRR!
Ryan Giggs, Ryan Giggs, running down the wing
Ryan Giggs, Ryan giggs, f****** Imogen
Caught by the press
Ran to the pigs
Ryan Giggs, Ryan Giggs, Ryan Giggs.
(taken from DS)
Originally Posted by Sezit:
Sparkles, he did it using the "Parliamentry privilage law" where they can say what the heck they like and not ever be prosecuted. The speaker was very cross with him and give him a telling off, but it was too late he couldn't take his words back.
Can anybody take that little squirt serious? His wife has him by the short and curleys for all he's worth. What a joke British Politics are really.
Originally Posted by cologne 1:
Originally Posted by Sezit:
Sparkles, he did it using the "Parliamentry privilage law" where they can say what the heck they like and not ever be prosecuted. The speaker was very cross with him and give him a telling off, but it was too late he couldn't take his words back.
Can anybody take that little squirt serious? His wife has him by the short and curleys for all he's worth. What a joke British Politics are really.
LOL, well said Cologne
If I had slept with Imogen Thomas, I would prefer an injection to an injunction. Penicillin preferably
*stolen from twitter*
Originally Posted by cologne 1:
Originally Posted by Sezit:
Sparkles, he did it using the "Parliamentry privilage law" where they can say what the heck they like and not ever be prosecuted. The speaker was very cross with him and give him a telling off, but it was too late he couldn't take his words back.
Can anybody take that little squirt serious? His wife has him by the short and curleys for all he's worth. What a joke British Politics are really.
I dont understand why he went for the injunction,most if not all Wags stand by their man.Taking on Twitter was utter madness,he should sue his legal team.
.
Originally Posted by sparkles:
Originally Posted by cologne 1:
Originally Posted by Sezit:
Sparkles, he did it using the "Parliamentry privilage law" where they can say what the heck they like and not ever be prosecuted. The speaker was very cross with him and give him a telling off, but it was too late he couldn't take his words back.
Can anybody take that little squirt serious? His wife has him by the short and curleys for all he's worth. What a joke British Politics are really.
LOL, well said Cologne
Rubbish. Parliamentary privilege exists for a very good reason. To allow mps and lords to speak freely. What would you rather? Have select committees etc tied up by libel lawyers going after them ad infinitum.
Originally Posted by Antiope:
Originally Posted by sparkles:
Originally Posted by cologne 1:
Originally Posted by Sezit:
Sparkles, he did it using the "Parliamentry privilage law" where they can say what the heck they like and not ever be prosecuted. The speaker was very cross with him and give him a telling off, but it was too late he couldn't take his words back.
Can anybody take that little squirt serious? His wife has him by the short and curleys for all he's worth. What a joke British Politics are really.
LOL, well said Cologne
Rubbish. Parliamentary privilege exists for a very good reason. To allow mps and lords to speak freely. What would you rather? Have select committees etc tied up by libel lawyers going after them ad infinitum.
But some are saying this MP is a self publicist and had abused this parliamentary privilege.