Skip to main content

Reference:
I pissed myself laughing when I saw him crying and shitting himself..
Nice bit of schadenfreude here too. I watched it unfold last night (he was in the diary room 3 times, and JJ2 was in with him for an hour, and Josie went in with him another time) and I was dying to see what happened inside the DR. He's been a prick from the get go this series. Doesn't give a rip my back foot 
suzybean
Reference:
what is wrong with sticking up for someone you care about?

Nothing, but in the first instance two adults should be able to address their differences without some well meaning spouse jumping in.  Patronising not to, IMO.

And if physical violence is involved - particularly from a sodding game show - there's EVERYTHING wrong.  IMO again, of course. 
bateman
Reference:
They both acted appallingly!
They did  She went in looking for trouble and looking for 'pay back' it seemed like she had her script prepared of what she was going to say to have a pop at him. He upped the stakes and went waaay too far. But whatever anyone says he did not say she was a prostitute or would sell her body for sex,  he said that she would do anything but that.
FM
Reference:
Nothing, but in the first instance two adults should be able to address their differences without some well meaning spouse jumping in.  Patronising not to, IMO. And if physical violence is involved - particularly from a sodding game show - there's EVERYTHING wrong.  IMO again, of course.
There was no differences being addressed - he basically implied she would sell her body for sex.
She acted with dignity - Nathan was angry on her behalf.
That is human nature - it will never change.
FM
Reference:
There was no differences being addressed - he basically implied she would sell her body for sex. She acted with dignity - Nathan was angry on her behalf. That is human nature - it will never change.

Which means I'm not human then, I guess. 

Anyway, some people are saying he said, the only thing she wouldn't do is sell herself for sex.  Is that true or not?  I must admit that's what I heard. 
bateman
Reference:
No Ducky - I know you like JJ1 but there was no justification for what he said... none.
Have i said there was?

If you read back I said they were as bad as each other. Both were snidey, both tried their upmost to push the other ones buttons. NEITHER acted with dignity. If he was my son I would have been ashamed. If she was my daughter I would have been ashamed. This has nothing to do with like or dislike.
Ducky
Reference:
Have i said there was? If you read back I said they were as bad as each other. Both were snidey, both tried there upmost to push the other ones buttons. NEITHER acted with dignity. If he was my son I would have been ashamed. If she was my daughter I would have been ashamed. This has nothing to do with like or dislike.
Fair enough...
Huge hug - sorry I am finding this whole thing so upsetting.
FM
Reference:
With a snide smile and a nasty tone in his voice that implied the opposite. Sorry Calli he as good as said it and he darn well meant it.
Thanks Izzy! I was just trying to find the right words to put that! I'm incoherent with rage... again... because I was watching it on LF yesterday. The snide, sarcastic tone started from the very start and built up to the tone for that comment. That obviously wasn't aired on LF though... sound dip. 
Xochi
he was smarmy and snidey throughout..i noticed he asked the others if they saw it on the screen.......when they said 'no'......he began boasting how he'd torn into her and nearly made her cry.........what it's got to do with him if she does the lads mags gawd only knows........
but i'd bet my house that come christmas they'll be the john james 2011 calender......full of pics of him with his shirt off doing his best 'smouldering look'.....complete with water dripping down his chest and a few shower shots for good measure
SS
Reference:
They did  She went in looking for trouble and looking for 'pay back' it seemed like she had her script prepared of what she was going to say to have a pop at him. He upped the stakes and went waaay too far. But whatever anyone says he did not say she was a prostitute or would sell her body for sex,  he said that she would do anything but that.
I agree. It was a tit for tat exchange....................................I feel the way he acted was inexcusable but ........................she was goading him - sadly probably on the instructions from BB producers.

A very sad state of affairs .............don't really want to see that on BB - why was it set up?
Soozy Woo
Reference:
he began boasting how he'd torn into her and nearly made her cry.........what it's got to do with him if she does the lads mags gawd only knows........ but i'd bet my house that come christmas they'll be the john james 2011 calender......full of pics of him with his shirt off doing his best 'smouldering look'.....complete with water dripping down his chest and a few shower shots for good measure
FM
Reference:
she was goading him - sadly probably on the instructions from BB producers.
she was. Im not defending him but i do think he was well and truly set up. They know with all their psychologists how he works and what buttons to push. they did it then sent in Nathan. it was all very well orchestrated.

Also I know that Nathan probably did think that he shouldn't have said that to his girlfriend but i also think half of all this im gonna kick his arse stuff was him pleasing the public.  For bb to let this go on is out of order, people have been chucked out of the house for less. People have been chucked out for implying violence while they invited someone in to intimidate one of their own house mates.

its all mental
FM

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×