I think that any housemate that has not been voted out by the public for 3 times should get automatic immunity from nominations.
Replies sorted oldest to newest
yes!
richard bb7 was as popular, can't remember
how many times he was up tho.
richard bb7 was as popular, can't remember
how many times he was up tho.
no thats the name of the game
and although it is boring for us and especailly someone you like and worse two people you like
That is bb for you
but they could do tasks that involve immunity like the usa
and although it is boring for us and especailly someone you like and worse two people you like
That is bb for you
but they could do tasks that involve immunity like the usa
I am not a big fan of BB messing with nominations but this sounds kind of fun.
quote:Originally posted by bozzimacoo:
yes!
richard bb7 was as popular, can't remember
how many times he was up tho.
i think someone said 6
craig bb1 was up lots too and won lol
Maybe for one week to force the others to look elsewhere for a minute and not use it as an excuse to pick people off.
No....I think HMs would be better of being made to 'Earn' treats not immunity from nominations.........
Perhaps a fresh idea on nominations would be HMs voting on who is the most intelligent HM....
Perhaps a fresh idea on nominations would be HMs voting on who is the most intelligent HM....
I only meant for 1 week, if the said housemate had been up consecutively (sp?) for 3 wks.
I mean I not a fan of Freddie (to be honest I haven't even watched it this year) but it just seems a bit benign to be put up every week
I mean I not a fan of Freddie (to be honest I haven't even watched it this year) but it just seems a bit benign to be put up every week
quote:Originally posted by Koala Brother:
I only meant for 1 week, if the said housemate had been up consecutively (sp?) for 3 wks.
I mean I not a fan of Freddie (to be honest I haven't even watched it this year) but it just seems a bit benign to be put up every week
it is indeed
you just know who its going to be and nothing can be done grrrrrrr
new housemates might shake it up
or tasks linked to nominations
I'd rather they voted 2 people who they wanted to stay and whoever has the least votes is up.
I hate that it's always 2 people up for eviction.
Give the public more of a say (with 3 or 4 up it's more exciting too), it's us that makes em the money by watching.
I hate that it's always 2 people up for eviction.
Give the public more of a say (with 3 or 4 up it's more exciting too), it's us that makes em the money by watching.
I like that idea too. I am sick of just 2 people being up for evictionquote:Originally posted by King Kev:
I'd rather they voted 2 people who they wanted to stay and whoever has the least votes is up.
I hate that it's always 2 people up for eviction.
Give the public more of a say (with 3 or 4 up it's more exciting too), it's us that makes em the money by watching.
quote:Originally posted by King Kev:
I'd rather they voted 2 people who they wanted to stay and whoever has the least votes is up.
I hate that it's always 2 people up for eviction.
Give the public more of a say (with 3 or 4 up it's more exciting too), it's us that makes em the money by watching.
That’s a great idea, but it will never happen. BB loves the idea of HM’s gunning for each other when nominating don’t they even encourage it? If they did the vote to stay they can’t get the same effect for viewing.
I think that if they turned the noms round it would be a better system. By that I mean each HM go in and has to nominate two people they wouldn't want up for eviction. This would help splinter the block vote. Plus it would make manipulating noms a lot harder.
Ignore this King Rev had same idea on previous page. Must read things properly.
Great idea King Rev
Ignore this King Rev had same idea on previous page. Must read things properly.
Great idea King Rev
