Skip to main content

Yesterday we saw Bea gossipping with Marcus about the missing food and the accusation of David being the Food Thief, so clearly, although Bea didn't accuse David directly to his face, he was right to assume that she had been making such an accusation.

Furthermore, the labelling of David as a bully. He may be many things, but a bully he is not!! I notice when Bea confronts/bitches about someone, she likes to use key words, such as bully, such as sleazy. Words which would cause maximum damage on the target, in the eyes of the public.

Anyway, as you can tell, I was firmly on David's side in this instance, and I'm not even a fan of him.

What about you?

Replies sorted oldest to newest

It was Marcus who started the missing food rumour, after talking to Freddie about it he then told Bea about it and mentioned food of his that had gone missing among other foods.

Bea being outspoken as she is mentioned the butter and bread to David which is how she ended up in a row with David today. When Marcus realised he was the cause of the conflict he tried to sort it out with Dave but unfortunately Bea started talking so David walked out
Yellow Rose
quote:
Originally posted by Yellow Rose:
It was Marcus who started the missing food rumour, after talking to Freddie about it he then told Bea about it and mentioned food of his that had gone missing among other foods.

Bea being outspoken as she is mentioned the butter and bread to David which is how she ended up in a row with David today. When Marcus realised he was the cause of the conflict he tried to sort it out with Dave but unfortunately Bea started talking so David walked out
Actually, Freddie started it, he told Marcus he had a 'feeling' that David had taken his rizla, and Hira's food Wink
ŨŸŅ”āļĢāļĒāļĢāđāļ āļ„Ï‚Ņ’āđŨ§Ũ§Ņ”Ðģ
quote:
Originally posted by Jâ‚ŽÅĄÂĩ§ Ã˜Ãą à ÂĐhÃķÞÃūÊÂŪ:
quote:
Originally posted by Yellow Rose:
It was Marcus who started the missing food rumour, after talking to Freddie about it he then told Bea about it and mentioned food of his that had gone missing among other foods.

Bea being outspoken as she is mentioned the butter and bread to David which is how she ended up in a row with David today. When Marcus realised he was the cause of the conflict he tried to sort it out with Dave but unfortunately Bea started talking so David walked out
Actually, Freddie started it, he told Marcus he had a 'feeling' that David had taken his rizla, and Hira's food Wink


Lol when I watched last night it was Marcus who suggested it to Freddie in the garden and Freddie then said he had a "feeling". Maybe or maybe not Marcus started the rumour because he was upset at David choosing himself to be the judge in the task earlier in the evening when he said he thought he or Freddie should have been. Not sure he was thinking of Freddie at the time it happened but it helped bring Freddie onside to his thinking lol.
Yellow Rose
THIS! For those who didn't watch the live feed.

quote:
Originally posted by CaptVimes:
Neither, David went looking for the argument as he said he would the night before. So difficult to feel sorry for him.

He did the damage he wanted to do and just before nominations too. Mission accomplished. There was little Bea could do this time though they both tried the crying card and the B card was put into play.



This was Lisa and Davids little plan all along and i'm suprised at the negative reaction Bea's getting after being set up.
The Guru
quote:
Originally posted by The Guru:
THIS! For those who didn't watch the live feed.

quote:
Originally posted by CaptVimes:
Neither, David went looking for the argument as he said he would the night before. So difficult to feel sorry for him.

He did the damage he wanted to do and just before nominations too. Mission accomplished. There was little Bea could do this time though they both tried the crying card and the B card was put into play.



This was Lisa and Davids little plan all along and i'm suprised at the negative reaction Bea's getting after being set up.


Yes, Thumbs Up
I thought it was just me thinking this after all the posts I have read tonight against Bea.

Bo
Suzy
Strictly speaking, Bea was in the right, as she hadn't accused him of stealing the food.

I think he had heard it when Marcus told Bea that David was stealing food, and he and Lisa strode into the kitchen, with attitude and started making toast to see what would be said.

Bea, probably deliberately, mentioned the butter and then asked if that was the last of Lisa and David's bread. David jumped to the conclusion that she was accusing him, so got right mardy.

So, yes, strictly speaking, she was in the right, but her over-acting, after her sneaky comments, is just laughable.
Blizz'ard
I'm on Bea's side here. I suppose it helps that I cant stand David, and his close friendship with Lisa just adds to the hate, PLUS the way he talks....

I thought Bea was perfectly reasonable/rational in her 'conflab' with Dave, and HE was downright nasty (bigging himself up in front of the Lis..)

I like Bea BECAUSE she says whats on her mind instead of fretting whether she'll get nominated for it Nod
BS
I don't know what has gone on behind the scenes, so neither. Bea did make a mahoosive 'poor me' mole hill out of it though (especially given that she - and Marcus - HAD, behind his back, been accusing him of stealing food).

She picked a blinding way of pointing the finger though. The 'you've been snappy' routine is virtually irrefutable by the accused as it's not necessarily what they've said but the way they've said it or it's been received by the 'victim'. Cunning little Bea.
subatomic partygirl

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×