Skip to main content

Just watched a programme where a film photographer was following a police unit.
When some of the arrested suspects objected to being filmed the police, on more than one occasion, said "It's a public place; he is allowed to film."
Is this so?
What would happen if I turned up with a film camera and poked my lens into the scene?
Would the police say "It's a public place; you are allowed to film?"
But in my murky depths of my memory I recall some people have been prohibited from filming. (I think Austin Mitchell MP was once stopped by police for photography.)
Does anyone know the regulations.
And why have these police people said "It's a public place; he can film." (Or are they lying and making an excuse?)

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Broadly speaking, photographers have the right to take pictures in any public place in the UK. However, there has been a growing trend in recent years for the police to crack down on photographers (usually in very innocent situations), often using things such as the anti-terrorism legislation to justify their actions. Photographers trying to take pictures in the centre of London have become a major target.


In the case described in the OP, it would have suited the police for the photographer to go about his (perfectly legitimate) business, so they defended his right to do so, They may well have had a different attitude if, say, there was any risk of him photographing (again, perfectly legitimately) police violence...

(BTW: brisket is right about Austin Mitchell. He's been a prominent campaigner on this issue.)


This site discusses some of the current problems photographers are experiencing: http://www.urban75.org/photos/...hts-and-the-law.html
Eugene's Lair
Last edited by Eugene's Lair
Reference kattymieoww Yesterday at 23:47:
 Not too sure but filming children..ie under 16 is a no no.
There is no law preventing the photographing of children in public places in the UK. However, the police may take an interest in someone who appears to be acting suspiciously.

The following is from the site I linked-to above:

"There is no legal restriction on photography in public places, and there is no presumption of privacy for individuals in a public place.

It is for the Chief Constable to ensure that Officers and Police Community Support Officers are acting appropriately with regards to photography in public places, and any queries regarding this should be addressed to the Chief Constable.

However decisions may be made locally to restrict photography, for example to protect children. Any questions on such local decisions should also be addressed to the force concerned."
Eugene's Lair
Funny enough I've been wondering about this myself lately.


After many years I have began to enjoy art (mostly painting again and although I'm no photographer it would be good to be able to take photographs of possible subjects which could then be interpreted in paint (if that makes sense ?)


But... It did cross my mind in these paranoid times if it could be more hassle than it's worth.
Comrade Ogilvy
On a similiar theme when you try to photograph playschool or school events like Christmas plays etc they always asked if anyone had any objections to their child being filmed - I think many parents used camcorders. If one parent objected noone could film or take photos. This was a few years ago and I have a feeling noone is allowed now - but I may be wrong.
liverbird

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×