He was shown a clip of Dwight talking about Peter adopting Harvey and asked how he would feel if Alex adopted his children. He stopped the interview in tears. The interviewer went too far.
Replies sorted oldest to newest
Awww, thing is, he has every right to be bloody annoyed, they are HIS kids and he loves Harvey as his own...he SHOULD have a say in their welfare.
Her just going off and doing what she wants is shocking, yes, she should be allowed to carry on with her life, but as Peter hardly know ALex, I think she is bang out of order....we know Alex is a good fella, but who, honestly would want their kids living with someone they hardly know and taking on the role as Daddy!!!!
Her just going off and doing what she wants is shocking, yes, she should be allowed to carry on with her life, but as Peter hardly know ALex, I think she is bang out of order....we know Alex is a good fella, but who, honestly would want their kids living with someone they hardly know and taking on the role as Daddy!!!!
I wasn't talking about Katie. It was the interviewer who kept pushing him.
Yes I watched it too Longcat and Andre was furious with Dwight Yorke......I think he was more upset about that tbh
I really don't know why they brought Dwight up he was only there to plug his song.
Surely he couldn't have adopted Harvey without Yorke's permission?
He seems to think it`s ok for him to say publicly that he wants to adopt Harvey, without having the courtesy to talk to Dwight Yorke first. When DY calls him disrespectful for doing that, he flips. The question then put to him was really.. how he would he feel to be put in the same position i.e. with Alex? I have no doubt he loves the children but his reaction was over dramatic and frankly, cringeworthy.
Croc I am not sure how it works when children are born out of wedlock. I think it also makes a difference if the fathers are named on the birth certificate.
As far as I was aware Dwight York was not named on the birth certificate and has had nothing to do with his son.
Peter was and does(on his own childrens) *shrugs*
Peter was and does(on his own childrens) *shrugs*
That's right Croc............apparently Andre wanted to adopt Harvey soon after he married Kate but I've no idea what happened to stop it. Dwight said that Andre was disrespecting him in wanting to do that yet when the interviewer asked him how he would feel if Alex wanted to adopt his kids he got really upset
I thought Yorke was named as the father. He is universally acknowledged to be the father and reading an article a while ago by him about the matter (the only time he has spoken publically about it as far as I am aware) he tells a very different story about not being allowed to see Harvey. She says (KP) he's never paid a penny for him, Yorke says different and says he can prove it.
The only thing I do know is that when there are further kids born they can apply to a judge to change the original kid's surname to be the same as the siblings..so Harvey could have been made an Andre (if the other kids are, who knows??) I'm pretty sure he could not ave been adopted without the fathers say so though.
The only thing I do know is that when there are further kids born they can apply to a judge to change the original kid's surname to be the same as the siblings..so Harvey could have been made an Andre (if the other kids are, who knows??) I'm pretty sure he could not ave been adopted without the fathers say so though.
A father needs to sign away all parental rights so that another man can adopt his child. Dwight as never done this.
Kate Burley pushed him too far. Everyone knows how Pete feels about his kids, so Ms Burley knew she would hit a nerve and get a reaction. And to insinuate that absent father Dwight York had a right to be upset about Pete adopting Harvey and comparing the situation to how Pete would feel about Alex wanting to adopt his kids, is a completely different situation and it was out of order for her to say it. Pete loves his kids, Dwight York does not show any love for Harvey.
I think Pete's reaction and his distress was genuine and any loving father would react in the same way.
Apparently she kept her own name when she married Peter Andre but this time she wants to change her name to Reid
Reference:
He seems to think it`s ok for him to say publicly that he wants to adopt Harvey, without having the courtesy to talk to Dwight Yorke first. When DY calls him disrespectful for doing that, he flips. The question then put to him was really.. how he would he feel to be put in the same position i.e. with Alex? I have no doubt he loves the children but his reaction was over dramatic and frankly, cringeworthy.
I agree with you Scotty 
Reference:
He seems to think it`s ok for him to say publicly that he wants to adopt Harvey, without having the courtesy to talk to Dwight Yorke first. When DY calls him disrespectful for doing that, he flips. The question then put to him was really.. how he would he feel to be put in the same position i.e. with Alex? I have no doubt he loves the children but his reaction was over dramatic and frankly, cringeworthy.
I agree.
Not keen on peter either, both a bad as each other. Will do anything for publicity.
If he loves his kids he would stop the circus and stop doing interviews with news papers.
One media attention freak is enough. I would respect peter more if he stopped the circus.
Two different situations. Dwight Yorke has little to no active role in the upbringing of Harvey, even if he does write a cheque every now and then.
As such it wouldn't be strange for someone who did/does play an active role in his upbringing to think about adoption.
Meanwhile, Peter sees his kids regularly despite the separation, and Alex Reid is merely Jordan's new plaything who probably wouldn't have anything to do with the kids if/when Jordan gets bored of him...
As such it wouldn't be strange for someone who did/does play an active role in his upbringing to think about adoption.
Meanwhile, Peter sees his kids regularly despite the separation, and Alex Reid is merely Jordan's new plaything who probably wouldn't have anything to do with the kids if/when Jordan gets bored of him...
Have I got it wrong or is this totally surreal? 
From the time I saw her discussing her current dozy twat Alex with Graham Norton, to the embarrassing BB finale, I've been in a state of disbelief. How many people does she have to abuse, misuse or sacrifice before the man on the Clapham Omnibus realises that she matters not a jot. Does deadwood like this really deserve so much publicity?
From the time I saw her discussing her current dozy twat Alex with Graham Norton, to the embarrassing BB finale, I've been in a state of disbelief. How many people does she have to abuse, misuse or sacrifice before the man on the Clapham Omnibus realises that she matters not a jot. Does deadwood like this really deserve so much publicity?
Tequila
The story is now on Sky news site but I don't know how to post it. Can I just say Katie said nothing it was the interviewer.
he is getting on my wick but saying that i never really was a fan 
poor mr "i wont speak about our relationship because of the kids" then sells the interview at a very opportune moment
but saying that i never really was a fan poor mr "i wont speak about our relationship because of the kids" then sells the interview at a very opportune moment
Reference:
The story is now on Sky news site but I don't know how to post it. Can I just say Katie said nothing it was the interviewer.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvs...ces-new-husband.html
Blimey, you must get your money's worth with a link that long! 
People must be interested somewhere I suppose. They seem to be newsworthy because, well, they're in the news so often. It's like a self-fuelling thing. If someone, say, very quietly kidnapped them and shot them all into space then I imagine the news about them would cut off abruptly. Well, I suppose it's possible the media would be running stories like: And amazingly this week, there's no news about Katie Price and her dim ex-husband! Etc.
People must be interested somewhere I suppose. They seem to be newsworthy because, well, they're in the news so often. It's like a self-fuelling thing. If someone, say, very quietly kidnapped them and shot them all into space then I imagine the news about them would cut off abruptly. Well, I suppose it's possible the media would be running stories like: And amazingly this week, there's no news about Katie Price and her dim ex-husband! Etc.
Reference: WILDER
I agree. Not keen on peter either, both a bad as each other. Will do anything for publicity. If he loves his kids he would stop the circus and stop doing interviews with news papers. One media attention freak is enough. I would respect peter more if he stopped the circus.
Spot on 
He stayed quiet for a while and gained respect for it. He has a new album to promote, of course. Perfect timing
Reference:
Spot on He stayed quiet for a while and gained respect for it. He has a new album to promote, of course. Perfect timing
He was also being filmed by his crew for his TV show.
Poor Peter, I don't blame him. I doubt she bothered to tell him she was getting married, which she should have seeing as Alex is now the children's step-father. A cross-dressing, cage fighting porn star - well done Katie you have out-done yourself this time.
Reference:
He was also being filmed by his crew for his TV show.
It's laughable isnt it? 
Reference: longcat
He was also being filmed by his crew for his TV show.
Ah..I doubt they`ll edit the "tears" then Reference:
It's laughable isnt it?
I have lost track of who's filming who for what No time for any of the 'adults' (and I use the term loosely) involved in this pathetic spectacle
It's the kids I feel sorry for
He'll be in OK next week, sombre front cover picture with the headline: `What Kay Burley Did Next`
Reference:
No time for any of the 'adults' (and I use the term loosely) involved in this pathetic spectacle It's the kids I feel sorry for
Turtelly agree. If this was happening within the popular tea-time soap Neighbours, they would have been fostered out by now.Reference:
He'll be in OK next week, sombre front cover picture with the headline: `What Kay Burley Did Next`
Poor Pete. My heart goes out.
Maybe there's a song in it
Maybe there's a song in it
Is it me or are they using Peter as the bloke with a knife on the Mafia Wars icon?
I think we should be told.
I think we should be told.
Reference:velvet
Poor Pete. My heart goes out. Maybe there's a song in it
I really don't care about either of them and their media merry go round. They are all as bad as each other...and I never want to see any of them again...some hope!
Reference:
Surely he couldn't have adopted Harvey without Yorke's permission?
If he's on the birth certificate then yes they would have had to get his permission.