Originally Posted by Pengy:
I know we laugh on here but I haven't forgotten how serious this case is
problem is this guy was just so farcical he couldn't be taken seriously
If I was OP I'd be wondering just why is Barry putting people like this on the stand and charging me. Surely if he's paying shed loads of Rand for a defence, he's entitled to the best no matter what we personally think of him? I don't think he's getting value for money. Either Roux is just pocketing easy money because there is very little defencewise he can do for OP, or he's cynically setting up an appeal avenue by virtue of a defective defence????
me either
Saying that, the last three days have been so farcical there was not much else to do but laugh until the end of it, you really couldn't take any of it seriously..
How did you do the sight test.. I used my eyes
How did you do the gun shot test..the gun wouldn't work, we got another and didn't use the same bullets and used a recording to do it in rapid succession.
How did you do the door test..I banged it with a bat..not the same bat
How did you take the photo's of someone in the bathroom..off the middle of the road looking up...
Was it still pitch black in the bedroom when you switched the patio light on...what patio light
I feel as if I've sat through three days of Ronnie Barker