Skip to main content

Originally Posted by Pengy:

I can just about get my head around having a gun but I will never understand is why he had those black talon bullets loaded if not to kill whoever he shot at 

 

they're not illegal in SA but.... only special forces and such carry them which begs the question where did he get them and why did he have them?

 

those bullets are designed to be lethal  

and after firing the shots he still thought the intruder was still coming for him !!

FM
Originally Posted by erinp:
Originally Posted by Pengy:

I can just about get my head around having a gun but I will never understand is why he had those black talon bullets loaded if not to kill whoever he shot at 

 

they're not illegal in SA but.... only special forces and such carry them which begs the question where did he get them and why did he have them?

 

those bullets are designed to be lethal  

and after firing the shots he still thought the intruder was still coming for him !!

 which is why it doesn't stack up and he's damning himself from his mouth at every turn 

FM
Originally Posted by Pengy:

I can just about get my head around having a gun but I will never understand is why he had those black talon bullets loaded if not to kill whoever he shot at 

 

they're not illegal in SA but.... only special forces and such carry them which begs the question where did he get them and why did he have them?

 

those bullets are designed to be lethal  

 

they were, why would anyone want to have them 

Dame_Ann_Average
Originally Posted by Pengy:

Nel I'm not a stickler for detail like you are and am corrected every time 

being sarcastic maybe .

OP spews out his script in detail but when questioned about anything away from his script  he can't remember ,he can't understand the question,he misunderstands the question, he cries ,he throws up ,he needs an adjournment .

FM
Originally Posted by erinp:
Originally Posted by Pengy:

Nel I'm not a stickler for detail like you are and am corrected every time 

being sarcastic maybe .

OP spews out his script in detail but when questioned about anything away from his script  he can't remember ,he can't understand the question,he misunderstands the question, he cries ,he throws up ,he needs an adjournment .

definitely sarcastic - needs to be careful or Judgie will pull him on it 

FM
Originally Posted by Dame_Ann_Average:
Originally Posted by erinp:

This is bloody marvellous .

 

 

he's tied him in knots, if he had told the whole truth from day one and not start changing it around to suit himself he wouldn't be getting hammered... Mind if I was Op and Gerrie Nel was at my throat, I think I would change my plea to guilty 

  Gerrie is known in legal circles in SA for being good at eliciting changes to testimony and defendants incriminating themselves - you don't send 20 top SAPS to arrest him as he's well'ard 

FM
Last edited by Former Member
Originally Posted by Dame_Ann_Average:

       
Originally Posted by erinp:

This is bloody marvellous .

 

 

he's tied him in knots, if he had told the whole truth from day one and not start changing it around to suit himself he wouldn't be getting hammered... Mind if I was Op and Gerrie Nel was at my throat, I think I would change my plea to guilty 


       


I was just going to say the same thing
Aimee
Originally Posted by Yogi19:

You may remember I was slagging off Nel's arrogant stance (foot on chair as he questions witnesses) and suggested that he wouldn't get away with it up here? Hubby informs me that a very eminent Scottish defence QC, adopts exactly the same stance!

   I thought they had better standards in Scottyland 

FM
Last edited by Former Member
Originally Posted by Pengy:
Originally Posted by Yogi19:

You may remember I was slagging off Nel's arrogant stance (foot on chair as he questions witnesses) and suggested that he wouldn't get away with it up here? Hubby informs me that a very eminent Scottish defence QC, adopts exactly the same stance!

 

where did my post go?

 

 

 

 

<small class="time"> 5m</small>

Just remember is still innocent but it seems twitter has proven him guilty

 

FM
Originally Posted by Pengy:
Originally Posted by Yogi19:

You may remember I was slagging off Nel's arrogant stance (foot on chair as he questions witnesses) and suggested that he wouldn't get away with it up here? Hubby informs me that a very eminent Scottish defence QC, adopts exactly the same stance!

   I thought they had better standards in Scottyland 

So did I - but hubby has seen this QC in action (not as a defendant) and assures me it's true.

Yogi19

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×