I think the whole thing...the murder, the police actions, the bail hearing..... are all very strange....
I wouldn't like to be on trial there that's for sure
Me either, Aims and I agree with Baz, the whole thing, from any angle looks well weird..
I think the whole thing...the murder, the police actions, the bail hearing..... are all very strange....
I wouldn't like to be on trial there that's for sure
Me either, Aims and I agree with Baz, the whole thing, from any angle looks well weird..
Roses are red, Violets are glorious, Don't try to surprise Oscar Pistorius.
Roses are red, Violets are glorious, Don't try to surprise Oscar Pistorius.
I was going to write something I saw on FB but thought better of it
I think the whole thing...the murder, the police actions, the bail hearing..... are all very strange....
I wouldn't like to be on trial there that's for sure
Me either, Aims and I agree with Baz, the whole thing, from any angle looks well weird..
There's no trial by jury, so it doesn't matter what comes out before the trial.
I fear we could end up not getting anywhere near the truth, I think its weird that he went out on the balcony for a fan and didn't see her missing when he came back. why would a young women sleeping with her boyfriend get dressed to go to the toilet... and why would an attacker/burglar lock themselves in a small toilet?
He said he shouted for them to get out of his house "or words to those effect" so why didn`t she answer him? like someone else said maybe we will never find out what really went on
He said he shouted for them to get out of his house "or words to those effect" so why didn`t she answer him? like someone else said maybe we will never find out what really went on
I know its wrong Aimee,,,but to me the whole story is very unconvincing, the police said she was dressed, why the hell would you get dressed at 4 in the morning to go to the loo
they had been in bed Baz and her mobile was found outside the toilet door... why would you get dressed and take your mobile phone to the loo at 4 in the morning
Bail decision at 12·30, the courts are arguing that he could change his appearance and skip bail I doubt he get away with that
Bail decision at 12·30, the courts are arguing that he could change his appearance and skip bail I doubt he get away with that
I doubt there's a lot a double leg amputee can do to trully change himself. It's not as if there were so many double leg amputees out there.
Bail decision at 12·30, the courts are arguing that he could change his appearance and skip bail I doubt he get away with that
I doubt there's a lot a double leg amputee can do to trully change himself. It's not as if there were so many double leg amputees out there.
True he'd need a lot of help to get away with it
Just watch him play some kinda disability card
That was the first story I heard too Baz - she'd been planning a Valentine surprise. Then that story just seems to disappear. I agree with you - I don't think there will be an outcome that everyone can accept.
Granted Bail .........No shock
Oscar Pistorius has been granted bail after a four-day hearing in the case of his alleged premeditated murder of Reeva Steenkamp.
The Paralympic champion has been accused of murdering his girlfriend after she was found shot dead at his Pretoria homein the early hours of February 14.
Magistrate Desmond Nair announced his decision today (February 22) in a two-hour statement after four days of legal discussions.
He stressed that the issue at hand in deciding bail was not solely the matter of the defendant's possible guilt, but whether or not the interests of justice would be served by the granting or withholding of bail.
Nair said that key to his decision was the detail of Pistorius's affidavit to the court - which directly addressed the state's case, rather than simply denying his guilt.
As the court designated the case a premeditated schedule six offence, the defence had attempted to prove "exceptional circumstances" of the weakness of the state's case for bail to be granted.
Specifically, Nair said that he had considered whether or not the defendant could afford to lose bail money, whether or not he had a propensity to violence, and if he will evade trial.
While not finding that the defence had shown the state's case to be so weak as to reach this level, the case was also not shown to be "so strong and watertight" that Pistorius would think he had to flee or evade his trial.
Nair asked if Pistorius would "duck and dive" to escape a trial, given the circumstances of the case where he may not definitely face a lengthy prison sentence, and concluded that the athlete would not be a flight risk.
He added that ex-lead investigating officer Hilton Botha had not spent enough time to prove propensity to violence on Pistorius's behalf, having not presented medical or other compelling evidence.
Nair previously took apart Botha's testimony, highlighting errors in the investigation, "bumbling" evidence and concessions to the defence, including his "perception of distance" between Pistorius's home and a female witness who had given him a statement.
However, he added that problems with the evidence and credibility of Botha's circumstantial evidence - the only evidence in the matter - did not mean that the state's case was not strong.
Nair admitted he had difficulties with various aspects of Pistorius's version of events on the night.
This included why he did not try to find Steenkamp when he first thought an intruder was in the house, why he did not find out who was in the toilet before shooting, why Steenkamp did not shout back when Pistorius yelled into the bathroom, and why he went into the possible danger of the bathroom rather than escaping through the bedroom door
At the start of the session, Nair had first addressed the matter of media coverage, explaining why he did not allow cameras in the courtroom.
He said that edited highlights may do the process of justice a disservice and that flashing cameras were an unwelcome intrusion.
Nair then spoke through the timeline of the case up until the end of today's arguments.
The magistrate then explained his reasons for Pistorius being detained in police cells during the hearing, rather than prison.
He said that it was to avoid any delay in the bail hearing and to protect Pistorius's right to present evidence of any "exceptional circumstances" by enabling him to regularly see his lawyers - but said that no precedent had been set in this regard.
Nair recounted Pistorius's statement, starting with his claim not to be guilty of murder, premeditated or otherwise.
Pistorius admitted shooting dead Steenkamp through a toilet door, but told the authorities that he thought she was an intruder when firing the shots.
He added that Pistorius pledged not to contact any witnesses, flee the scene and would also hand in his passport.
Nair then summarised the presentations and cross-examinations over the course of the four-day hearing from prosecutor Gerrie Nel and defence lawyer Barry Roux.
The magistrate said that the state had met the threshold for a schedule six case of premeditated murder to be brought.
Lead investigator Botha, who underwent robust cross-examination from Roux, was taken off the case yesterday when it emerged that
Read more: http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/sh...e.html#ixzz2LdhyfAbW Follow us: @digitalspy on Twitter | digitalspyuk on Facebook
I'm tending to believe him now, I still do think there are some things to the story that are odd but some of the things being reported were wrong, they said that she has been hit by him with the cricket bat but in court today they say she had no signs of being attacked before being shot, I guess we will have to wait for the trial to see what happened
That was the first story I heard too Baz - she'd been planning a Valentine surprise. Then that story just seems to disappear. I agree with you - I don't think there will be an outcome that everyone can accept.
Thanks Kaffy..... I thought maybe I had imagined it
I'm tending to believe him now, I still do think there are some things to the story that are odd but some of the things being reported were wrong, they said that she has been hit by him with the cricket bat but in court today they say she had no signs of being attacked before being shot, I guess we will have to wait for the trial to see what happened
Oh so she was just shot ? well thats ok then, im glad he's free now.
Just watch him play some kinda disability card
I do think that the fact that he has no legs was a part of the reason why he has so many supporters who believe in him, if the guy was able bodied and did the same thing I doubt so many people would believe his bizarre story.
I'm tending to believe him now, I still do think there are some things to the story that are odd but some of the things being reported were wrong, they said that she has been hit by him with the cricket bat but in court today they say she had no signs of being attacked before being shot, I guess we will have to wait for the trial to see what happened
Oh so she was just shot ? well thats ok then, im glad he's free now.
Did I say that ? I said I was leaning to believe his story but that I found some of it odd, nowhere did I say it was ok that he shot her, get it right before you try to twist my words
I'm tending to believe him now, I still do think there are some things to the story that are odd but some of the things being reported were wrong, they said that she has been hit by him with the cricket bat but in court today they say she had no signs of being attacked before being shot, I guess we will have to wait for the trial to see what happened
Oh so she was just shot ? well thats ok then, im glad he's free now.
Did I say that ? I said I was leaning to believe his story but that I found some of it odd, nowhere did I say it was ok that he shot her, get it right before you try to twist my words
I know you didn't say that, i never said you did say that, im just saying that just because theres confusion over what happened that it's fine for him to be bailed, in some peoples minds, im not having a go at you.
But in South Africa getting bail does not depend on the severity (or otherwise) of the crime. It depends on whether you might skip. commit a similar crime, or something else that I can't remember at the moment.
But in South Africa getting bail does not depend on the severity (or otherwise) of the crime. It depends on whether you might skip. commit a similar crime, or something else that I can't remember at the moment.
He could easily skip town and disappear.
But in South Africa getting bail does not depend on the severity (or otherwise) of the crime. It depends on whether you might skip. commit a similar crime, or something else that I can't remember at the moment.
He could easily skip town and disappear.
He will definitely do a runner(no pun intended)
But in South Africa getting bail does not depend on the severity (or otherwise) of the crime. It depends on whether you might skip. commit a similar crime, or something else that I can't remember at the moment.
He could easily skip town and disappear.
He will definitely do a runner(no pun intended)
LOL, theres loads of puns to be had here.
But the funniest thing I heard during all of this was that there was a S. African rugby player that he thought was eyeing up his g/f once, and he threatened to break that Rugby players legs...now that was ironic I thought.
I'm tending to believe him now, I still do think there are some things to the story that are odd but some of the things being reported were wrong, they said that she has been hit by him with the cricket bat but in court today they say she had no signs of being attacked before being shot, I guess we will have to wait for the trial to see what happened
Oh so she was just shot ? well thats ok then, im glad he's free now.
Did I say that ? I said I was leaning to believe his story but that I found some of it odd, nowhere did I say it was ok that he shot her, get it right before you try to twist my words
I know you didn't say that, i never said you did say that, im just saying that just because theres confusion over what happened that it's fine for him to be bailed, in some peoples minds, im not having a go at you.
OK
But in South Africa getting bail does not depend on the severity (or otherwise) of the crime. It depends on whether you might skip. commit a similar crime, or something else that I can't remember at the moment.
He could easily skip town and disappear.
He will definitely do a runner(no pun intended)
LOL, theres loads of puns to be had here.
But the funniest thing I heard during all of this was that there was a S. African rugby player that he thought was eyeing up his g/f once, and he threatened to break that Rugby players legs...now that was ironic I thought.
Ironic indeed.Not a legs man it seems
Pistorius has a history of troubles with women. Last year, Pistorius allegedly threatened to break the legs of a man whom he suspected of being involved with his then-girlfriend while Pistorius was in London for the Olympics. â[Pistorius] carries a gun everywhere and I have seen him be controlling to women,â said Mark Batchelor, a friend of the man Pistorius threatened. After they broke up, Pistoriusâs ex-girlfriend, Samantha Taylor, told South Africaâs Rapport newspaper that she was âprepared to reveal what (Pistorius) made me go through;â on advice from her lawyers, she later withdrew her statement. In 2009, Pistorius was arrested and charged with common assault after slamming a door on a woman with whom he had fought at a party. (The charges were later dropped, and Pistorius sued the woman and the police.)
Is that not the same woman this week that said he never laid a finger on her like I said it all seems very odd and I wouldn't like to be tried there
But in South Africa getting bail does not depend on the severity (or otherwise) of the crime. It depends on whether you might skip. commit a similar crime, or something else that I can't remember at the moment.
He could easily skip town and disappear.
He will definitely do a runner(no pun intended)
LOL, theres loads of puns to be had here.
But the funniest thing I heard during all of this was that there was a S. African rugby player that he thought was eyeing up his g/f once, and he threatened to break that Rugby players legs...now that was ironic I thought.
Ironic indeed.Not a legs man it seems
Pistorius has a history of troubles with women. Last year, Pistorius allegedly threatened to break the legs of a man whom he suspected of being involved with his then-girlfriend while Pistorius was in London for the Olympics. â[Pistorius] carries a gun everywhere and I have seen him be controlling to women,â said Mark Batchelor, a friend of the man Pistorius threatened. After they broke up, Pistoriusâs ex-girlfriend, Samantha Taylor, told South Africaâs Rapport newspaper that she was âprepared to reveal what (Pistorius) made me go through;â on advice from her lawyers, she later withdrew her statement. In 2009, Pistorius was arrested and charged with common assault after slamming a door on a woman with whom he had fought at a party. (The charges were later dropped, and Pistorius sued the woman and the police.)
It's like the Jimmy Savile thing, some of the stories might be made up but they can't all be false...theres alot of smoke there and I think theres some fire too.
It's like the Jimmy Savile thing, some of the stories might be made up but they can't all be false...theres alot of smoke there and I think theres some fire too.
I agree Video......
But in South Africa getting bail does not depend on the severity (or otherwise) of the crime. It depends on whether you might skip. commit a similar crime, or something else that I can't remember at the moment.
He could easily skip town and disappear.
He will definitely do a runner(no pun intended)
But as they said....he has trouble getting through airports because of his disab ility anyway I don't think he will
Granted Bail .........No shock
There's always shocks with "Famous" people, Gazza for instance, "Football hero" celebs run to pay for his alcoholism treatment, yet he's a wife beater and doesn't see his son but it's ok cause he can kick a ball
me, I certainly don't think they have a case for premeditated murder, but I do think there is far more to it that what he is saying
me, I certainly don't think they have a case for premeditated murder, but I do think there is far more to it that what he is saying
Part of me agrees with that, but how would he not notice that she'd gone from bed and he called out who's there (re the bathroom) and he shot her from the distance that they say
Access to this requires a premium membership.
Upgrade to VIP premium membership for just $25/year to unlock these benefits:
Ad-Free | Search Site | Start Dialogs |
Upload Photos | Upload Videos | Upload Audio |
Upload Documents | Use Signature | Block Members |
View Member Directory | Mark All Topics As Read | Edit Posts Anytime |
Post To Walls |