Skip to main content

Originally Posted by Yogi19:
Originally Posted by Dame_Ann_Average:

 

No problem Yogi 

 

Can't find it yet...by all accounts its just his version acted out by him and Aimee. personally I think its sick to be honest, but my opinion matters little in a SA court 

No worries.

 

 

 

still can't find it Yogi...soon as I do I will post the link 

Dame_Ann_Average

allegedly the Defence are up in arms that this has leaked  and tried to get an injunction to stop it being shown.  Too late.

 

Have to query why show it now?

It was made immediately after OP had testified so could be construed as just being his version.

Most of what is in it, is court footage so nothing we've not seen already with the few added clips of him walking on his stumps and dragging Aimee about the place

 

It's been alleged that a so called expert [I don't know who] has decided OP must be innocent having seen this video 

 

quite a few of the journos who have seen it in Oz say it neither supports the Defence or State so is of little use except sensationalism

 

the State are Nelshocked [geddit?] by this turning up at this late stage 

FM
Originally Posted by Dame_Ann_Average:
Originally Posted by Yogi19:
Originally Posted by Dame_Ann_Average:

 

No problem Yogi 

 

Can't find it yet...by all accounts its just his version acted out by him and Aimee. personally I think its sick to be honest, but my opinion matters little in a SA court 

No worries.

 

 

 

still can't find it Yogi...soon as I do I will post the link 

Thank you.

Yogi19
Originally Posted by Pengy:

allegedly the Defence are up in arms that this has leaked  and tried to get an injunction to stop it being shown.  Too late.

 

Have to query why show it now?

It was made immediately after OP had testified so could be construed as just being his version.

Most of what is in it, is court footage so nothing we've not seen already with the few added clips of him walking on his stumps and dragging Aimee about the place

 

It's been alleged that a so called expert [I don't know who] has decided OP must be innocent having seen this video 

 

quite a few of the journos who have seen it in Oz say it neither supports the Defence or State so is of little use except sensationalism

 

the State are Nelshocked [geddit?] by this turning up at this late stage 

 

it's all very dodgy Pengy, I can't get my had around OP having PTSD and being able to do this  I'm thinking WTF, its sick and just something to bolster his case, paid for by him 

Dame_Ann_Average
Originally Posted by Pengy:

I'm wondering if it is up yet due to a possible injunction - let's remember Youtube will take something like this down in seconds yet beheadings of westerners are there for all to see 

 

and breathe 

 

I'm waiting for some sneaky b*gger to upload it on DS  Although I am not sure I could stomach watching it to be honest 

Dame_Ann_Average

One of the things the reports did for me was to make me change my perception of OPs brother Carl - seems he stepped in as a father figure to OP and Aimee at a very young age and became the figure they clung to and to keep them safe - must have been difficult for Carl while so young as their father was a waste of space 

 

My perception of OP remains 

FM
Last edited by Former Member
Originally Posted by Dame_Ann_Average:

 

 

I'm still not sure about Carl, although I must agree they are a very close family and it must have been hard for them. 

 

 

I don't think Carl is as bad as we probably think he is - that CH charge that he faced was spurious and I think a lot of people will be swayed by that which was unfair.  they are a close family and no one can knock them for that   Don't like Aimee much mind 

FM
Originally Posted by Pengy:
Originally Posted by Dame_Ann_Average:

 

 

I'm still not sure about Carl, although I must agree they are a very close family and it must have been hard for them. 

 

 

I don't think Carl is as bad as we probably think he is - that CH charge that he faced was spurious and I think a lot of people will be swayed by that which was unfair.  they are a close family and no one can knock them for that   Don't like Aimee much mind 

 

 

on that I can 100% agree 

Dame_Ann_Average
Originally Posted by Pengy:

       
Originally Posted by Dame_Ann_Average:

 

 

I'm still not sure about Carl, although I must agree they are a very close family and it must have been hard for them. 

 

 

I don't think Carl is as bad as we probably think he is - that CH charge that he faced was spurious and I think a lot of people will be swayed by that which was unfair.  they are a close family and no one can knock them for that   Don't like Aimee much mind 


       


What have I done
Aimee
Originally Posted by Aimee:
Originally Posted by Pengy:

       
Originally Posted by Dame_Ann_Average:

 

 

I'm still not sure about Carl, although I must agree they are a very close family and it must have been hard for them. 

 

 

I don't think Carl is as bad as we probably think he is - that CH charge that he faced was spurious and I think a lot of people will be swayed by that which was unfair.  they are a close family and no one can knock them for that   Don't like Aimee much mind 


       


What have I done

   Wot u done now?

FM
Originally Posted by Roger the Alien:

Forum won't let me like posts so just wanted to say the thread makes fascinating reading and thanks to Pengy  and Dame  especially.

 

its not a problem Rosie...it fascinates us too, although I find the leaking of this video may scupper everything...very much O.J Simpson style for my liking 

Dame_Ann_Average
Originally Posted by Aimee:
Originally Posted by Pengy:

       
Originally Posted by Dame_Ann_Average:

 

 

I'm still not sure about Carl, although I must agree they are a very close family and it must have been hard for them. 

 

 

I don't think Carl is as bad as we probably think he is - that CH charge that he faced was spurious and I think a lot of people will be swayed by that which was unfair.  they are a close family and no one can knock them for that   Don't like Aimee much mind 


       


What have I done

where do I start?  this won't lead to a new career in Hollywood you know - Bollywood mebbe but no staring rolls for you destroyer of White goods 

FM
Last edited by Former Member
Originally Posted by Dame_Ann_Average:
Originally Posted by Roger the Alien:

Forum won't let me like posts so just wanted to say the thread makes fascinating reading and thanks to Pengy  and Dame  especially.

 

its not a problem Rosie...it fascinates us too, although I find the leaking of this video may scupper everything...very much O.J Simpson style for my liking 

Much appreciated Dame 

Yes, its very odd allright 

 

FM
Last edited by Former Member
Originally Posted by Pengy:
<small class="time"> 26s</small>

lawyers say footage of shooting reenactment was "illegally obtained" and sold to Australian Broadcaster

 

but were from? I'm sure neither side were up for airing it...so where did it come from? I do think it would nullify the last couple of days testimony. i'm sure if Nel had it and wanted to use it, he would have brought it into evidence  to dispute that OP can move around capably on his stumps  

Dame_Ann_Average
Originally Posted by Pengy:

       
Originally Posted by Aimee:
Originally Posted by Pengy:

       
Originally Posted by Dame_Ann_Average:

 

 

I'm still not sure about Carl, although I must agree they are a very close family and it must have been hard for them. 

 

 

I don't think Carl is as bad as we probably think he is - that CH charge that he faced was spurious and I think a lot of people will be swayed by that which was unfair.  they are a close family and no one can knock them for that   Don't like Aimee much mind 


       


What have I done

where do I start?  this won't lead to a new career in Hollywood you know - Bollywood mebbe but no staring rolls for you destroyer of White goods 


       


Aimee
Originally Posted by Dame_Ann_Average:

 

 

Journalists are all over this...happened in court on Thursday apparently the Prof was looking directly at OP when it appears OP shakes his head at the Prof to say answer no.

 

it happens in the first in the first 3/4 seconds of this video

 

 

clearer version.

 

what am I supposed to be seeing?  Apart from OP handing a note to that bloke and then gawping back at the witness??? 

FM
Originally Posted by Pengy:
Originally Posted by Dame_Ann_Average:

 

 

Journalists are all over this...happened in court on Thursday apparently the Prof was looking directly at OP when it appears OP shakes his head at the Prof to say answer no.

 

it happens in the first in the first 3/4 seconds of this video

 

 

clearer version.

 

what am I supposed to be seeing?  Apart from OP handing a note to that bloke and then gawping back at the witness??? 

 

 

at the very start Pengy, OP look at the Prof and shakes his head 

Dame_Ann_Average
Originally Posted by Dame_Ann_Average:

 

 

its before the note about 2 seconds in 

I've just watched it 3 times to make sure I'm seeing what I'm seeing but immediately after he hands over the note he looks towards Derman and very subtly shakes his head - to me, it looks like he's telling Derman to shut up and not proceed with what he's saying which surely must be interference with a witness? 

FM
Originally Posted by Pengy:
Originally Posted by Dame_Ann_Average:

 

 

its before the note about 2 seconds in 

I've just watched it 3 times to make sure I'm seeing what I'm seeing but immediately after he hands over the note he looks towards Derman and very subtly shakes his head - to me, it looks like he's telling Derman to shut up and not proceed with what he's saying which surely must be interference with a witness? 

Dame_Ann_Average
Originally Posted by Dame_Ann_Average:
Originally Posted by Pengy:
Originally Posted by Dame_Ann_Average:

 

 

its before the note about 2 seconds in 

I've just watched it 3 times to make sure I'm seeing what I'm seeing but immediately after he hands over the note he looks towards Derman and very subtly shakes his head - to me, it looks like he's telling Derman to shut up and not proceed with what he's saying which surely must be interference with a witness? 

so why are people not all over this or will Nel strike come Monday???? 

FM

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×