Skip to main content

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Reference:  Blizzie
or just getting down there and spoiling your ballot,
.... at least if I spoil my ballot, then they can't add me to the apathetic statistic can they?

or can then?

I'd go for middle of the road lib dem... but their new proposals on lowering family tax credit thresholds would quite literally put us out on the street!  

Though if I vote lib dem then there may be a chance of a hung parliament... in which case they may not get much done... arguing & negotiating & stuff... but they won't be able to do as much harm either!

Ahhh... wish we had someone.... inspirational... you know.. like the US & Obama (not in terms of policy, in terms of excitement)... that kind of feeling... something to get passionate about!
Dirtyprettygirlthing
Reference:
.... at least if I spoil my ballot, then they can't add me to the apathetic statistic can they?
No, I don't think they can.  I would like to see a 'none of the above' category included on ballot papers for people who don't like their choices, but until that happens, if people can't bring themselves to vote for any of their candidates, then they have the option of spoiling their ballot paper.  It shocks me every time how many people don't bother to vote - and then they seriously expect to  have the right to criticise the government or their local council.    As Joe said, women died to give us the right to vote, and I think everyone has a duty to at least bother to turn up at the polling station.
FM
I think this has the potential to be the most important election in our lifetime and could well decide on how our lives are shaped in the future. However I have little enthusiam for Labour or Conservative. I believe that the current Labour regime includes some who are bent on carrying out social engineering which I find very disturbing. There are those who wish to have total control over every single aspects of our lives from birth to death. Several years ago I heard that since Labour had come into power, some 3000 new criminal offences had been created. The number must be much more by now. It's likely that every one in this country has committed some offence not necessarily realising that they are doing anything illegal. But in this country ignorance of the law is no excuse even if we have not had the opportunity to read every single law where a new offence has been committed.

And as for democracy, consider the passing of The Criminal Justice and Immigration Act of 2008. This was a major act which resulted in considerable debate and amendments at the Committee stage. A significant number of amendments were to be made at the Third Reading. (The Third Reading is a key stage in the process and gives the House of Commons the opportunity to discuss the bill and to approve or reject the amendments.) Just before the one day allowed for this stage, there were some sudden new clauses added to the bill relating to prisons by Jack Straw. As a result the one day allowed was devoted just to discussion of the new clauses and no opportunity was given to discuss the other proposed amendments so the bill went through essentially without discussion. This was regarded by many in the Houses of all parties as a travesty. You can read Hansard for the proof.

As far as the Conservatives are concerned, well in view of the present business concerning Ashcroft who can trust who? Which breed of Conservative will we have, the middle ground, right of centre, or right? Who knows?

Personally I will continue to vote for the Liberal Democrats as they are the closest party to my views, though certainly not in all respects, as a minority party they can afford to be relatively honest, and in reality this could be the best opportunity for there to be a hung parliament with them being able to exercise some influence.

I don't think we should abstain in prorest over the expenses scandal as what good would that do? Yes we could vote for one of the other parties, but I have concerns over voting for a candidate with a one policy campaign and although some independents would be outstanding MPs, how could a parliament consisting of independents form a governing party capable of making decisions which would be acceptable to all those in that party? As for voting for BNP, I have nothing but utter hatred for them and in the unlikely event that they had any chance of being elected where I live, I would vote for which ever party had the best chance of defeating that candidate.

End of rant, but I think this is a particularly important election.
El Loro
Dirtyprettything, I've just noticed your comment on reducing the tax credits thresholds. Accorsing to the Liberal Democrats website, they intend to reduce the credits for those above average income so that they can channel them towards those on below average income. I haven't seen anything to suggest that you are likely to be thrown out onto the street.
El Loro
An article in The Telegraph on Nick Clegg's recent speech concerning tax credits reads:

He said the average wage in the UK was ÂĢ24,000 and people earning over this would not necessarily always lose out but the assumption should be that only those below that level should be entitled to claim tax credits. Mr Clegg said that people who earn like him, a salary of ÂĢ60,000 should not benefit from tax credits

He said: "We would certainly take it very aggressively towards those people on above average incomes which would give us just over ÂĢ3 billion."

El Loro
This election reminds of the South Park episode where they rip on the Bush v Gore campaign over in the states by having the school kids decide between two offensive choices for the school mascot, the message being that you'll more often than not be choosing between two people you don't really like, but you should still choose or else the system fails....

I honestly don't know who I'm going to vote for, the Tories have been sending me mail at least once a week for a few months now, both from my local candidate and from DC himself, but all it seems to contain is details of where Labour have gone wrong rather than what they are actually going to do to sort it out, which IMO, is where they've gone wrong since they had that massive lead in the polls a while back.

Furthermore, I realise that we are supposed to vote for our local candidates, but the fact that Gordon Brown would be PM again puts me off voting for Labour, and the less said about the rest of the choices the better.

Maybe I'll employ the tactic of eeny, meeny, miny, moe...
disley21
lib dems have the wrong leader from  stuff i've read, clegg seems decent enough, if a bit wishy washy in appearance, but i've read and listened to a fair  bit of vince cables views, respect to him.fair chance of lib dems picking up the local seat here, the tories have been a disaster in local govt. for us,spent  hundreds of 1000's destroying the town,ploughing  money into pet projects,that no one wants, but they insist on going ahead to ruin the place just a bit more.everything is mock victorian , a half arsed pedestrianisation  scheme,shoppers now getting mowed down by buses,shops going out of business not only because of the recession but also because the council in it's effort to tart up and sanitise the town centre means roads constantly being dug up ad nauseum,so no one can get to the frickin shops anyway,sanitised or not, and to pay for all this carnage, lets stop travel concessions for pensioners..nice one..
jacksonb
If I were to base my vote on local councillors only.. then it would be Lib Dem.   We have a lib Dem Councillor in the next ward (the ward I live in is a Tory stronghold...  and the councillor is a complete nob imo) who has got to be one of the hardest working people I have ever seen.   I reckon the other councillors groan when they see him approaching... he is like a dog with a bone, won't be fobbed off.... and from what I can tell, I think he pretty much stands up to the rest of our Council on his own.    He looks a bit mad...  quite Michael Foot like actually...  but there's no doubt his heart is still very much in the right place.

Going back to the Lib Deb Family tax credit thing.... Thank you El Loro... for that Telegraph article.   Yes, its the ÂĢ24k figure that scares me stupid.  We are over that... but not by much.  There is an ambiguity in the statement as to whether our tax credit would or would not be affected.

*sighs*... I am actually going to have to do my homework if I want to make an informed vote aren't I?
Dirtyprettygirlthing
Reference: Jackson
spent  hundreds of 1000's destroying the town,ploughing  money into pet projects,that no one wants
oh god.. I hear ya!   We have this white elephant called the VAF (visual arts facility)... they are ploughing millions into it!  For who?  No-one wanted it... well not enough to pay millions for it.  & insult to injury... someone has decided to change the way the traffic runs through our town AGAIN.   It was two way down the high street... then it became one way (with huge knock on effects throughout the town)... and its just been announced they are going to change the direction of this one way system next year!

WTF!  It makes me sick!
Dirtyprettygirlthing
Reference:
An article in The Telegraph on Nick Clegg's recent speech concerning tax credits reads: He said the average wage in the UK was ÂĢ24,000 and people earning over this would not necessarily always lose out but the assumption should be that only those below that level should be entitled to claim tax credits. Mr Clegg said that people who earn like him, a salary of ÂĢ60,000 should not benefit from tax credits He said: "We would certainly take it very aggressively towards those people on above average incomes which would give us just over ÂĢ3 billion."
I have to say I agree with this....There were no such thing as tax credits when we were raising our family, we both worked and managed to live within our means quite comfortably.....In some instances I have saw folk in receipt of these TC relying on them to fund holidays private schooling etc which imo are a choice not a necessity.
~Lee~
Reference:
Dirtyprettygirlthing, re the tax credits, don't forget that the Liberal Democrats would also intend to increase the personal allowance to ÂĢ10000. That's roughly a saving of ÂĢ700 for the lower and average earners
thank you El Loro...  hubby was just saying about the increase in personal allowance... though he didn't convert that to actual money... so thank you xx

Just for the record (in response to an earlier post by a different FM)...  we use the tax credits as a temporary crutch..  to get us through what has been a really scary time... redundancy, unemployment & now my husband has a job.. but it pays less, a lot less, than his previous job.   & no, I don't "work"... not right now..  I have worked (& paid tax into the system), I will work again (& happily pay tax once again), but for a lot of reasons, I don't have a paid job right now.

Oh... & there are no holidays for us.... & I can barely afford my kids school uniforms let alone pay for their education.
Dirtyprettygirlthing
Reference: Lee
There were no such thing as tax credits when we were raising our family,
You would have received family allowance though Lee and at that time, no matter what a family earned, everybody in the country received the same amount. This is now called child tax credit, which is means tested. The more you earn, the less you get.
Scotty

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×