Skip to main content

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Originally Posted by Enthusiastic Contrafibularities:

 

It's being reported that Wayne Rooney has signed a deal paying him up to ÂĢ300,000 per week.

 

Even as a fan of football I find these salaries crazy, esepcially when I start to think about how many struggle along every day.

 

I fully understand that it's market forces which produces salary levels like this but I do wish we could have a cap on them.

 

You can read the story here : http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/26287482

 

 

 

Obscene was  exactly my thought when I heard it EC! Personally I find it disgusting that anyone gets paid these huge salaries just for kicking a ball around a field 

Baz
Originally Posted by Sprout:
Originally Posted by pirate1111:

it might be a bit justified if England ever got near to winning a cup-but we dont

But then, there are some that say he doesn't pull his weight on the England field 

i really dont know so much about football

OH is a villa fan as is everyone round here

the local pub is a villa pub

im not really bothered

all i know is England are shite & are overpaid

so why do people think rooney dont play the game for England?

 

pirate1111
Originally Posted by pirate1111:
Originally Posted by Sprout:
Originally Posted by pirate1111:

it might be a bit justified if England ever got near to winning a cup-but we dont

But then, there are some that say he doesn't pull his weight on the England field 

i really dont know so much about football

OH is a villa fan as is everyone round here

the local pub is a villa pub

im not really bothered

all i know is England are shite & are overpaid

so why do people think rooney dont play the game for England?

 

He just doesn't seem to be as prolific for England as he is for Utd.  Apparently he goes 'missing' on the England field 

 

But.....that could also be the players around him

FM

This makes my blood boil.

 

Former Radio 1 DJ Chris Moyles has apologised for his part in a ÂĢ1million tax scheme that saw him pose as a second-hand car dealer in order to claim expenses, a tribunal has found.

 

A published judgment from the Tax Chamber of the First-tier Tribunal named Moyles and two other men as having taken part in the "working with wheels" deal, which counted "450 fund managers, celebrities and other high earners between 2006 and 2008" as members.

The scheme allowed members to claim that they had incurred large fees by working as second-hand salesmen, which they could then claim back against their own tax bills.

Moyles’ self-assessment tax return for the financial year ending on 5 April 2008 – while he was still a presenter on BBC Radio One’s Breakfast Show – claimed that the DJ "had engaged in self-employment as a used car trader".

Moyles did not give evidence himself at the tribunal, but he did submit a "brief witness statement".

Judge Colin Bishopp described the evidence as "very brief and rather uninformative".

"It is however quite clear from the statement that he too entered the scheme for no purpose other than to achieve a tax saving, and that he took no interest in the trade," the judgement said.

It added that Moyles was "anxious to be reassured that the scheme was lawful, and that he would not have to undertake any trading himself".

It also detailed that his accountant, Mr Smith, had "agreed that the scale of Moyles’s borrowing was driven solely by the amount of the tax loss he wanted to achieve, in his case ÂĢ1 million, and that the trading was not carried on for its own sake but was merely a means to an end".

Exchequer Secretary David Gauke said: "This case is another example of why taxpayers should not fall for the promises of promoters selling schemes that are all too often too good to be true.

"Not only will the taxpayer waste money on the fees for these failed schemes, they will still have to pay all the tax, interest and penalties that are due.

"This Government has provided HMRC with the resources to tackle these avoidance schemes and HMRC will now pursue the other users of the scheme to make sure all the taxes that are due are paid."

FM
Originally Posted by Sprout:
Originally Posted by erinp:
Originally Posted by Sprout:

And they chased me for ÂĢ820 that I'm still paying off, four years later......cos they moved the goal posts!!  

It makes me so feckin mad .

Me too!  I prolly could've paid it off sooner but no.....they're not getting it any sooner   

Give them the minimum possible who cares  if it takes you a lifetime to pay it back

 

FM
Originally Posted by erinp:
Originally Posted by Sprout:
Originally Posted by erinp:
Originally Posted by Sprout:

And they chased me for ÂĢ820 that I'm still paying off, four years later......cos they moved the goal posts!!  

It makes me so feckin mad .

Me too!  I prolly could've paid it off sooner but no.....they're not getting it any sooner   

Give them the minimum possible who cares  if it takes you a lifetime to pay it back

 

It just overshoots it by about 97p owed by the time we're prolly about to be made redundant at the end of this year 

FM
Originally Posted by Sprout:
Originally Posted by erinp:
Originally Posted by Sprout:
Originally Posted by erinp:
Originally Posted by Sprout:

And they chased me for ÂĢ820 that I'm still paying off, four years later......cos they moved the goal posts!!  

It makes me so feckin mad .

Me too!  I prolly could've paid it off sooner but no.....they're not getting it any sooner   

Give them the minimum possible who cares  if it takes you a lifetime to pay it back

 

It just overshoots it by about 97p owed by the time we're prolly about to be made redundant at the end of this year 

Scarey times ahead .

FM
Originally Posted by erinp:
Originally Posted by Sprout:
Originally Posted by erinp:
Originally Posted by Sprout:
Originally Posted by erinp:
Originally Posted by Sprout:

And they chased me for ÂĢ820 that I'm still paying off, four years later......cos they moved the goal posts!!  

It makes me so feckin mad .

Me too!  I prolly could've paid it off sooner but no.....they're not getting it any sooner   

Give them the minimum possible who cares  if it takes you a lifetime to pay it back

 

It just overshoots it by about 97p owed by the time we're prolly about to be made redundant at the end of this year 

Scarey times ahead .

Yup. and to make it more odd......I work with the unemployed 

FM
Originally Posted by Sprout:
Originally Posted by erinp:
Originally Posted by Sprout:

I went on that link thinking it was about your work situation and it was talking about Wayne Rooney

Oops!  It should be about 'genuine' peeps who have been put out of work and claiming benefits rather than 'the others' 

went back on and it's Ned from Blackpool talking about the juice diet ( he lost 7 and a half  stone if you must know) .

FM
Last edited by Former Member
Originally Posted by Cold Sweat:

A less lucrative contract than the one Jennifer Aniston had on Friends more than a decade ago.

 

Yes, massive salaries/contracts have been common in Tinseltown for many, many years. It staggers me when I hear actors can demand ÂĢ20M, ÂĢ30M or more for a film. In recent years TV seems to have developed a higher stays in the US and what actors earn has gone hand in hand with this.

 

Edit: Yes I also think these massive payoffs for actors are obscene. On each film there will be a lot more people payed a hell of a lot less.

 

 

Enthusiastic Contrafibularities
Last edited by Enthusiastic Contrafibularities

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×