Skip to main content

Replies sorted oldest to newest

quote:
Originally posted by Ņ•ÏÎđ∂Ņ”ŅÐžÏƒÎ·ÐšŅ”Îģ:
But Bea was too unpredictable in her nominating. She nominated Marcus and Freddie the week Freddie was evicted. I couldn't trust her at all.
it's the unpredictability that would have mucked them up.they would have gone for her this week,and marcus and/or siavash, she would have gone then at least we'd have 2 characters for the final week,.
jacksonb
quote:
Originally posted by Ņ•ÏÎđ∂Ņ”ŅÐžÏƒÎ·ÐšŅ”Îģ:
But Bea was too unpredictable in her nominating. She nominated Marcus and Freddie the week Freddie was evicted. I couldn't trust her at all.


Yep, but David IS predictable. There may have been a risk with Bea but with David we had a dead cert nomination for Siavash and Marcus.

And whether you like them or not it means you have a one clique final - and a clique that hasn't ever really faced the risk of eviction. They've been cosy for weeks.
Cariad
quote:
Originally posted by JacksonB:
do we?

david would be gone, the block voting would have been far less effective, and now we are going to have a bunch of muppets in the final.

If Bea had stayed over David, it wouldn't have made that much difference to the voting. Marcus and Siavash would still have been up: the only change would have been that Dave would probably been up with them. When it came to the public vote, Dave would have been quietly ignored as the public fought over Marcus and Siavash.

Let's face it: we all knew weeks ago that only one of the "three amigos" would make it into the final week...
Eugene's Lair
quote:
Originally posted by Eugene's Lair:
quote:
Originally posted by JacksonB:
do we?

david would be gone, the block voting would have been far less effective, and now we are going to have a bunch of muppets in the final.

If Bea had stayed over David, it wouldn't have made that much difference to the voting. Marcus and Siavash would still have been up: the only change would have been that Dave would probably been up with them. When it came to the public vote, Dave would have been quietly ignored as the public fought over Marcus and Siavash.

Let's face it: we all knew weeks ago that only one of the "three amigos" would make it into the final week...
bea would have been up.
jacksonb
quote:
Originally posted by JacksonB:
quote:
Originally posted by Eugene's Lair:
quote:
Originally posted by JacksonB:
do we?

david would be gone, the block voting would have been far less effective, and now we are going to have a bunch of muppets in the final.

If Bea had stayed over David, it wouldn't have made that much difference to the voting. Marcus and Siavash would still have been up: the only change would have been that Dave would probably been up with them. When it came to the public vote, Dave would have been quietly ignored as the public fought over Marcus and Siavash.

Let's face it: we all knew weeks ago that only one of the "three amigos" would make it into the final week...
bea would have been up.

Yeah - I've just realized my previous post doesn't make any sense! (Posting while trying to do other things... Roll Eyes)
Maybe she'd have been up again, maybe not.
What I have learnt from all these years of BB is that tactcical voting and trying to second-guess nominations never works in the long-run...
Eugene's Lair
Yeah but maybe being allowed to openly discuss nominations this year has made them more convinced they know who is likely to be up?

Either way next week there'll be two basic camps of voters. And the Team Lisa voters will be spread out every which way voting for their particular favourite whereas the Marcus/Siavash (Sophie) voters will be more focused.
Cariad

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×