IT'S MINE !!!

 

 . . and heir  to a fortune

  

 

 

It's Lyons!!

 

Not Willy Wonka!

Shurrup you

I'm gonna become a reet snob and all that

Colman's.

 

Finest cut English Mustard.

Except Nigella wouldn't touch ya with one of these: 

  

That's a Viennese cinnamon stick.

 

If you have Volume 7.

Not easy to find in Partick   

The defence team must be in cabinet.

Consoling her.

if a get her enuf drugs do ya think she will wack her boobs out

Only if you get banged up in Holloway next time.

 

 

 

 

She lost her mum, sister and first husband to cancer. I'd be a gibbering wreck. I admire her for carrying on.

 

so what if she snorts a bit, not for me but what's it to do with anyone else. I am beginning to wonder who the hell is on trial here 

Glass houses.

 

Dame   

 

  

I agree with you. These women spent a lot of money with or without approval and the outcome seems to be Nigella arrested for taking drugs. It just seem all wrong somehow.

 

 

I doubt she gave them permission to spend those amounts Cologne, and I doubt she'll be prosecuted for something she admitted to over ten years ago, the rest is hearsay. It's just the whole thing I am finding distasteful, it appears she was really good to these sisters and she's been stabbed in the back by them and that arse of a husband, who by all accounts was never aware his wife of ten years was indulging in any sort of drug activity, 

Few presumptions there..  

 

 

true and a lot of unproven accusations from the other side...tit for tat 

Big team cupcake spin on Sky's paper review.

 

I've not seen Velvet...just mud sticks, so whatever she's gonna be stuck with it now, true or not 

"Imagine my surprise when rooting through her handbag I found ........."
Is this how people operate nowadays ? Mrs Jer doesn't have one, but I'm sure that if Dad had gone within six feet of my Mum's she would have killed him.

 My hubby and sons would never go into my handbag. Even if I ask them to get me something out of my bag, they will bring the bag to me, rather than go in it.

That's how I feel.  And why where the Grillo sisters doing in her hand bag anyway?  Mr C nor Master C would ever go in to my handbag, they always bring it to me if they want something that might be lurking in there.

 I should have continued reading to the end of the thread before I posted my handbag rooting outrage.

oh but according to the Grillo sister - Francesca I think, no requests were needed - they just knew they had permission

 

I really do feel it's Nigella that's been on trial here not these sisters

Just out of curiosity, who reported these sisters for theft? Was it Nigella? If so maybe that is why she's getting all the flack in the court..

 

tho I must say I can't see how any of the revelations about Nigella have anything to do with the Sisters defence for  nicking over half a million quid which is expenditure on themselves, not the family home I presume. . some of their payments must have been okay'd but they wouldn't be part of the case only the OTT non specific personal to them ones surely ....

From what I can gather and I may be wrong, but after Nigella and Saatchi divorced, finances were looked at by his accountant (I get the feeling he is a control freak and controlled all the finances) anyhoo the accountant queried some of the expenditure with Saatchi and they in turn questioned the Grillo sisters.  He allegedly offered them a way to pay back what they had allegedly spent with no permission, but they refused saying they would prefer jail.    It's from this that the Nigella let us spend what we like so we wouldn't tell about her drug use came from.  According to Francesca - Nigella had been very generous with them and they didn't need permission to spend on the cards as it was allegedly a given that they could spend what they liked to keep quiet.

ah cheers for that Pengy ..makes more sense how it came about now...

If the spending on the credit card was, as the sisters allege, hush money in return for not telling Mr Saatchi about Nigella's supposed drug taking, then why on earth would Nigella tell them to use one of Mr Saatchi's credit cards? It makes no sense.

 

the whole case makes no sense and I partly agree with their lawyer that the reason Saatchi went to court was to have a sideways swipe at Nigella as she's the one who's been attacked the most in this case - he's a barsteward and she's better off out of it imo

 I agree with everything you said.

 

I thought this was a thread about her new series.

 

 

At least the coverage on the news seems to be shifting to where it belongs: on the accused!

And the credibility of the accusers!

 

Like all court cases or I'm missing something.

 

I agree too. Saatchi played a risky game with this one. Good luck Trini.

 

 

yes!

Yeah, now that all the clutching pearls, broken glass houses brigade have had a moment to gather themselves.