Replies sorted oldest to newest
Time will tell how this works out but good luck to Nathan & Rachel. Makes a change from the flipping JJ/Josie douche-vet fest. Glad that Rachel now seems less fazed by what JJ thinks and that Nathan spoke out. And yes, I hope that Corin or Sam wins.
Ah, so the showmance that never was? And if Nathan means what he is saying rather than BB are giving him a script, then he needs to remove that stuff from his fb. And just as a matter of interest, has Rachael been in Nuts yet?
Reference:
Ah, so the showmance that never was? And if Nathan means what he is saying rather than BB are giving him a script, then he needs to remove that stuff from his fb. And just as a matter of interest, has Rachael been in Nuts yet?
apparently so.Reference:
apparently so.
What, she's been in Nuts?
She was in Nuts the week after she was evicted. Rachael and Nathan didn't look like a couple and why did she keep rolling her eyes at him?
Reference:
She was in Nuts the week after she was evicted
Okay, maybe I'm being seriously dim here, so what was all the fuss about re JJ1 making reference to it?Reference:
Okay, maybe I'm being seriously dim here, so what was all the fuss about re JJ1 making reference to it?
If you find out let me know 
Reference:
'm being seriously dim here, so what was all the fuss about re JJ1 making reference to it?
Remember how he shouted at her aggressively? in front of everybody...so insultingly nasty when it was none of his business..that's what the fuss was about more than her getting photographed in Nuts.
According to some forumers yesterday he said she was 'selling her body' If so, that was very nasty even if true to a certain extent!
Reference:
Remember how he shouted at her aggressively? in front of everybody...so insultingly nasty when it was none of his business..that's what the fuss was about more than her getting photographed in Nuts.
Granny, I understand that and agree it was out of order, what I don't understand is yesterday, when it all kicked off it seemed that the main thing everyone was getting hot under the collar about was the ref to Nuts magazine
I imagine it's quite short[/obviousjoke]
Reference:
According to some forumers yesterday he said she was 'selling her body' If so, that was very nasty even if true to a certain extent!
You mean implying that she was a prostitute Kimota? If so, I agree that is different. I did see it on lf, but honestly can't remember that bit, although I may have missed it. If he did say/imply that then it's one of the many cuts on the C4 vidReference:
You mean implying that she was a prostitute Kimota? If so, I agree that is different. I did see it on lf, but honestly can't remember that bit, although I may have missed it. If he did say/imply that then it's one of the many cuts on the C4 vid
Well not quite as harsh as that, but criticising her for doing Nuts! What a puritan he is! If I was offered a few hundred quid for getting my kit off and I thought it wouldn't damage my career I would do it ! Its just a body !Reference:
Well not quite as harsh as that, but criticising her for doing Nuts! What a puritan he is! If I was offered a few hundred quid for getting my kit off and I thought it wouldn't damage my career I would do it ! Its just a body !
It would have to be tasteful and artistic, mind!
Reference:
under the collar about was the ref to Nuts magazine
Don't know about everybody getting hot under the collar re Nuts mag yesterday SupesI think he said she was selling her body... BB are manipulating this ...they are the biggest twisters so would cut this out
Reference:
It would have to be tasteful and artistic, mind!
kimota you go