Watching documentary on 5+1 now
Imagine if its been hijacked and to be fllown into a western target ... with all passengers still on board
Watching documentary on 5+1 now
We've just watched it on 5.
WHAT !!!!
The pilot allowed passengers to be on the flight deck !!!
Smoking!!!
WHAT !!!!
The pilot allowed passengers to be on the flight deck !!!
Smoking!!!
Yup and chatting them up too - doesn't fill you with confidence.
Its been hijacked for sure
Its been hijacked for sure
So where has it landed then??
Isn't there a theory that they were looking for the nearest suitable landing strip after experiencing problems?
yes - I read that soozy - overcome by fire and put onto auto pilot then crashed into the ocean after 7 hours -Pilot turned to go to nearest airstrip common practice apparently but why wait until they are between traffic controllers - coincidence ???? - just weird
Its been hijacked for sure
So where has it landed then??
Second star to the right, straight on til morning
Isn't there a theory that they were looking for the nearest suitable landing strip after experiencing problems?
yes - I read that soozy - overcome by fire and put onto auto pilot then crashed into the ocean after 7 hours -Pilot turned to go to nearest airstrip common practice apparently but why wait until they are between traffic controllers - coincidence ???? - just weird
Hi Ros Surely can't be a coincidence - just too weird!
Its been hijacked for sure
So where has it landed then??
Second star to the right, straight on til morning
That sounds more plausible than what's happening now Sainty
Isn't there a theory that they were looking for the nearest suitable landing strip after experiencing problems?
yes - I read that soozy - overcome by fire and put onto auto pilot then crashed into the ocean after 7 hours -Pilot turned to go to nearest airstrip common practice apparently but why wait until they are between traffic controllers - coincidence ???? - just weird
Hi Ros Surely can't be a coincidence - just too weird!
I thought they had established that the tracking devices were turned off before the Co-Pilot sent the 'goodnight' message. Its definteley a bizarre case. I just wish that they would find out what has happened to it for the sake of the families.
Isn't there a theory that they were looking for the nearest suitable landing strip after experiencing problems?
yes - I read that soozy - overcome by fire and put onto auto pilot then crashed into the ocean after 7 hours -Pilot turned to go to nearest airstrip common practice apparently but why wait until they are between traffic controllers - coincidence ???? - just weird
The thing is if they put it on auto pilot then why are they looking near Australia, they would have to type in the codes into the auto pilot to tell it where to go so why have they ended up near Australia
Isn't there a theory that they were looking for the nearest suitable landing strip after experiencing problems?
yes - I read that soozy - overcome by fire and put onto auto pilot then crashed into the ocean after 7 hours -Pilot turned to go to nearest airstrip common practice apparently but why wait until they are between traffic controllers - coincidence ???? - just weird
The thing is if they put it on auto pilot then why are they looking near Australia, they would have to type in the codes into the auto pilot to tell it where to go so why have they ended up near Australia
Yes, seems they took a left turn - south west - that could explain the theory they were heading to the nearest airport for an emergency landing. But then yet another turn - south towards southern Indian ocean, west of Australia and heading towards the Antarctic.
Its baffling. Must be torture for the poor relatives not even knowing.
Isn't there a theory that they were looking for the nearest suitable landing strip after experiencing problems?
yes - I read that soozy - overcome by fire and put onto auto pilot then crashed into the ocean after 7 hours -Pilot turned to go to nearest airstrip common practice apparently but why wait until they are between traffic controllers - coincidence ???? - just weird
The thing is if they put it on auto pilot then why are they looking near Australia, they would have to type in the codes into the auto pilot to tell it where to go so why have they ended up near Australia
Yes, seems they took a left turn - south west - that could explain the theory they were heading to the nearest airport for an emergency landing. But then yet another turn - south towards southern Indian ocean, west of Australia and heading towards the Antarctic.
Its baffling. Must be torture for the poor relatives not even knowing.
That's the odd bit to me, who put in the codes for it to go in the way it did and why, also if they think something went wrong ie fire and then they were trying to land why then go on to fly out to where they are looking now
Malaysian Airlines officials have confirmed that flight MH370 had been carrying highly flammable lithium-ion batteries in its cargo hold.
The news has added further weight to the theory that the crew on the aircraft may have been overcome by an on-flight fire.
The Malaysian airlines flight disappeared from trace on March 9, while flying over the Southern Indian ocean, with 239 passengers and crew on board.
The admission by CEO Ahmad Jauhari that the ill-fated flight was carrying potentially dangerous cargo, follows a denial four days ago.
http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/missi...air-disaster-1441356
The last final 54 mins of communication from flight MH370
The thing is if they put it on auto pilot then why are they looking near Australia, they would have to type in the codes into the auto pilot to tell it where to go so why have they ended up near Australia
Yes, seems they took a left turn - south west - that could explain the theory they were heading to the nearest airport for an emergency landing. But then yet another turn - south towards southern Indian ocean, west of Australia and heading towards the Antarctic.
Its baffling. Must be torture for the poor relatives not even knowing.
That's the odd bit to me, who put in the codes for it to go in the way it did and why, also if they think something went wrong ie fire and then they were trying to land why then go on to fly out to where they are looking now
Exactly! Its strange... none of the theories quite fit
Thanks for those links with the extra info Erin
One thing I can't get out of my head is, what if the passengers knew for all those hours, they were on a doomed plane and were trapped.
I see there are reports of 'wreckage' off Australia150 from where the previous 'wreckage' was reported...
I see there are reports of 'wreckage' off Australia150 from where the previous 'wreckage' was reported...
Wonder if its different wreckage or the same?
Don't know if anyone else has seen the clip of the pilots going through security, I don't know if it's what they have to do but they both look up at a camera, the younger go does it for longer
The truth is they don't know and can only speculate. I wouldn't like to be one of the poor relatives who have to go through that every day
The way things are looking they may never know what's happened to their loved ones either Aimee. Which is all the more upsetting for them
must be so awful and unimaginable
The way things are looking they may never know what's happened to their loved ones either Aimee. Which is all the more upsetting for them
it's terrible moons and unbelievable in this technological age
I see there are reports of 'wreckage' off Australia150 from where the previous 'wreckage' was reported...
Wonder if its different wreckage or the same?
Hi rosie
I see there are reports of 'wreckage' off Australia150 from where the previous 'wreckage' was reported...
Wonder if its different wreckage or the same?
Hi rosie
Hi Ros hope you're well
I see there are reports of 'wreckage' off Australia150 from where the previous 'wreckage' was reported...
Wonder if its different wreckage or the same?
they seem to think its the same Rosie, the drift would be about right
http://news.uk.msn.com/world/m...ebris-spotting299876
The CEO of Malaysia Airlines has separately confirmed highly flammable lithium-ion batteries were among the cargo being flown by flight MH370, days after he denied the plane was carrying any dangerous items.
Ahmad Jauhari said the batteries were were classified as non-dangerous goods and had been loaded onto the plane in compliance with aviation guidelines, with the cargo checked several times before take-off.
The batteries, which are used in mobile phones and laptops, have caused a number of fires on commercial planes and - in extreme cases - been blamed for destroying two cargo planes.
Worrying........
I see there are reports of 'wreckage' off Australia150 from where the previous 'wreckage' was reported...
Wonder if its different wreckage or the same?
Hi rosie
Hi Ros hope you're well
I'm fine thanks - hope you are OK
http://news.uk.msn.com/world/m...ebris-spotting299876
The CEO of Malaysia Airlines has separately confirmed highly flammable lithium-ion batteries were among the cargo being flown by flight MH370, days after he denied the plane was carrying any dangerous items.
Ahmad Jauhari said the batteries were were classified as non-dangerous goods and had been loaded onto the plane in compliance with aviation guidelines, with the cargo checked several times before take-off.
The batteries, which are used in mobile phones and laptops, have caused a number of fires on commercial planes and - in extreme cases - been blamed for destroying two cargo planes.
Worrying........
awful - saw this on TV - causes a hell of an explosion
I see there are reports of 'wreckage' off Australia150 from where the previous 'wreckage' was reported...
Wonder if its different wreckage or the same?
Hi rosie
Hi Ros hope you're well
I'm fine thanks - hope you are OK
Doing ok thanks Ros
http://news.uk.msn.com/world/m...ebris-spotting299876
The CEO of Malaysia Airlines has separately confirmed highly flammable lithium-ion batteries were among the cargo being flown by flight MH370, days after he denied the plane was carrying any dangerous items.
Ahmad Jauhari said the batteries were were classified as non-dangerous goods and had been loaded onto the plane in compliance with aviation guidelines, with the cargo checked several times before take-off.
The batteries, which are used in mobile phones and laptops, have caused a number of fires on commercial planes and - in extreme cases - been blamed for destroying two cargo planes.
Worrying........
awful - saw this on TV - causes a hell of an explosion
Yes it does, but it doesn't explain why the plane flew off course for several hours, an explosion would be quick and the plane would have been found by now.
I may be being a tad thick here, but why are people surprised it is taking so long to find any plane wreckage? It took decades to find the titanic and people knew roughly where it sank as other ships were in the area picking up survivors.. it was a heck of a lot bigger than a plane too... if the plane was heading in a different direction any wreckage may have sank long before they started searching south of its original path..
I feel for the family's but I get very frustrated with all the conspiracy theorist and people putting out full on 'documentary' programmes based around nothing but guesswork and supposition..
I read a suggestion about what happened from a Pilot of 20 yrs... I would have more faith in his theory than I would have in some producer wanting to grab a fast buck on the back of a tragedy by rolling out a documentary within a week or two.. the Pilot stated that the fact the plane went dark was easily explained due to a sudden onboard fire knocking out all electrics and possibly the whole of the crew and passengers eventually, depending on what was burning... he said they practice that possibility and they turn towards the nearest landing strip and put the the plane on auto pilot but if the fire is of the kind that knocks people out within 30secs there is nothing that can be done.. they can't wear oxygen masks if there is a fire and fire hoods give no more than 2 minutes of air and that's about it.
it is very sad all around..
Olly, I read that one but sadly seems to have been debunked now
http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/2...heory_n_4995610.html
It's all just so bizarre, my friend was speculating about it being shot down if it went into airspace it shouldn't and wasn't identifying itself, but no one would want to 'own up' to that!
awww that's a shame. .I do wonder if some country has more info about last position but is not revealing it because it will reveal what technical capabilities that country has, if that makes sense.. I know what I mean anyway
I hope for the sake of the families that they can find it and they can at least know the truth . .I suspect a lot are holding out that their relatives are alive somewhere.. which sadly seems the most unlikely outcome of all
Didn't some other country shoot a plane out of the sky for invading airspace a few yrs back. .I think that was detected by a lot of other countries tho so, if the same had happened, I reckon it would also have been detected by countries using satellites specifically to check for missile launches so unlikely to be the case with this plane..