Skip to main content

quote:
Originally posted by Mazzystar:
It was common practice here a few years back to do that.Its only because we went so long without a recession that employers stopped doing it.

That happened to a friend who worked in a small shop fairly recently. I think he wasn't doing very well and didn't want to pay her redundancy if he folded so told her to go before her 2 years were up.

I've been quite conscious of it myself when I've changed jobs. It's a risk, for sure, but I'm lucky enough to be in an industry where it's not systematic.

The thing is though, the law can simply be changed without needing to go back to a unionised workforce. There's always going to be capitalist tension in the workplace for people who sell their labour for wages.

That's why (say) software engineers are paid ÂĢ35K a year and shop assistants ÂĢ6 an hour. Shop assistants are usually easily replaced so they can't really demand higher wages. And if they were paid much higher wages then shop prices would go up accordingly.

For all the catastrophic consequences of Mrs Thatcher's radicalism, the country needed a radical change in industrial relations to survive. The interesting thing is that we need something radical again now. We won't be able to support the country's debts very soon without a lot of painful pruning and carefully targetted taxation.
FM
quote:
Originally posted by Daniel J*:
quote:
Originally posted by Mazzystar:
It was common practice here a few years back to do that.Its only because we went so long without a recession that employers stopped doing it.

That happened to a friend who worked in a small shop fairly recently. I think he wasn't doing very well and didn't want to pay her redundancy if he folded so told her to go before her 2 years were up.

I've been quite conscious of it myself when I've changed jobs. It's a risk, for sure, but I'm lucky enough to be in an industry where it's not systematic.

The thing is though, the law can simply be changed without needing to go back to a unionised workforce. There's always going to be capitalist tension in the workplace for people who sell their labour for wages.

That's why (say) software engineers are paid ÂĢ35K a year and shop assistants ÂĢ6 an hour. Shop assistants are usually easily replaced so they can't really demand higher wages. And if they were paid much higher wages then shop prices would go up accordingly.

For all the catastrophic consequences of Mrs Thatcher's radicalism, the country needed a radical change in industrial relations to survive. The interesting thing is that we need something radical again now. We won't be able to support the country's debts very soon without a lot of painful pruning and carefully targetted taxation.


I've always worked in the public sector,so job security isn't an issue thank goodness.But it doesnt mean that there is no room for unionism in my workplace.Even in education,workers are still exploited.Teaching assistants are only paid for term time(plus standard holiday pay.They are only paid the hours they work and dont have a paid lunch break!Most of them have short term contracts so that they can be replaced/removed according to schools budgets,yet they aren't as a group unionised!
Their duties vary from supporting a classroom to supply cover!(At heads discretion)
Without being organised,it will be difficult to change their working conditions.So unions are still essential in improving working conditions for many(even non members).
It upsets me when they still get such a bad press.They work very much alongside bosses rather than against them.And we take for granted many of the benfits they negotiated for us for granted.
The amount of debt we have atm is very worrying tho..and I do worry about my kids futures as a result of it
M
quote:
Originally posted by Daniel J*:
quote:
Originally posted by Mazzystar:
It was common practice here a few years back to do that.Its only because we went so long without a recession that employers stopped doing it.

That happened to a friend who worked in a small shop fairly recently. I think he wasn't doing very well and didn't want to pay her redundancy if he folded so told her to go before her 2 years were up.

I've been quite conscious of it myself when I've changed jobs. It's a risk, for sure, but I'm lucky enough to be in an industry where it's not systematic.

The thing is though, the law can simply be changed without needing to go back to a unionised workforce. There's always going to be capitalist tension in the workplace for people who sell their labour for wages.

That's why (say) software engineers are paid ÂĢ35K a year and shop assistants ÂĢ6 an hour. Shop assistants are usually easily replaced so they can't really demand higher wages. And if they were paid much higher wages then shop prices would go up accordingly.

For all the catastrophic consequences of Mrs Thatcher's radicalism, the country needed a radical change in industrial relations to survive. The interesting thing is that we need something radical again now. We won't be able to support the country's debts very soon without a lot of painful pruning and carefully targetted taxation.


I have NEVER like this "us and them" mentality in the workplace, but IMO the bosses are as bad if not WORSE than the unions, I can of course only go on personal experiences,
heres one,

I went WITH my then boss too Thialand in 2003, the purpose of the visit was that I was needed to train the Thais in a factory to do MY job,(I had been assured by my boss beforehand that MY job was safe)
the working conditions and pay that these people got was an eye opener,(though NOT as bad as China)...I overheard my boss turn to his second in command (who also went with us) and say,"its a pity we cant get OUR lot to work for this"

oh and as for his "assurances" about MY job...he FIRED me when we got home, saying "sorry I dont need you anymore"
and of course it goes without saying that there was NO union allowed in HIS factory, wonder why that was then? Shake Head
old hippy guy
quote:
Originally posted by Mazzystar:
It upsets me when they still get such a bad press.They work very much alongside bosses rather than against them.And we take for granted many of the benfits they negotiated for us for granted.

My brother's a shop steward, for my sins. Ninja

Union relations are generally much, much better now, of course, than in the 70s. We have a staff council where I work instead of a union. The union tried to set up but no-one was interested.

Speaking of industrial action and given that the weather is turning out nice, isn't it time the French air traffic controllers went on strike again? Smiler
FM
quote:
Originally posted by Daniel J*:

My brother's a shop steward, for my sins. Ninja

Union relations are generally much, much better now, of course, than in the 70s. We have a staff council where I work instead of a union. The union tried to set up but no-one was interested.

Speaking of industrial action and given that the weather is turning out nice, isn't it time the French air traffic controllers went on strike again? Smiler



What do you mean "for your sins?" my Marmite hating friend. You should be proud.
Union relations are only better from the perspective of the boss class employers because they have workers over a barrel. The union of HR scum depts. regularly meet up and share ideas on how to spread misinformation. They don't care. They are evil!
I hope that you never need a Union, well respected fellow warrior against yeast based products.
Garage Joe
quote:
Originally posted by Daniel J*:
quote:
Originally posted by Mazzystar:
It upsets me when they still get such a bad press.They work very much alongside bosses rather than against them.And we take for granted many of the benfits they negotiated for us for granted.

My brother's a shop steward, for my sins. Ninja

Union relations are generally much, much better now, of course, than in the 70s. We have a staff council where I work instead of a union. The union tried to set up but no-one was interested.

Speaking of industrial action and given that the weather is turning out nice, isn't it time the French air traffic controllers went on strike again? Smiler


oh god I am NOT wishing for a return to the sheer MADNESS of the 70s
but I DO think that there are a lot of working men and women out there who dont realise what they have to thank the trades unions for.
Shake Head
old hippy guy
quote:
Originally posted by Bigdaddyostrich:
In my limited experience of employment tribunal cases, unions and their shop stewards are only too happy to drop their members like a sack of bricks when the going gets tough


well, I once tried to take a boss to a tribunal WITHOUT a union behind me....the boss I was talking about earlier as it happens,....needless to say I failed...and so did the appeal Nod
old hippy guy
quote:
Originally posted by old hippy guy:
quote:
Originally posted by Bigdaddyostrich:
In my limited experience of employment tribunal cases, unions and their shop stewards are only too happy to drop their members like a sack of bricks when the going gets tough


well, I once tried to take a boss to a tribunal WITHOUT a union behind me....the boss I was talking about earlier as it happens,....needless to say I failed...and so did the appeal Nod


should have tried it with a decent barrister in front of you Thumbs Up
bigdaddyostrich
quote:
Originally posted by Bigdaddyostrich:
quote:
Originally posted by old hippy guy:
quote:
Originally posted by Bigdaddyostrich:
In my limited experience of employment tribunal cases, unions and their shop stewards are only too happy to drop their members like a sack of bricks when the going gets tough


well, I once tried to take a boss to a tribunal WITHOUT a union behind me....the boss I was talking about earlier as it happens,....needless to say I failed...and so did the appeal Nod


should have tried it with a decent barrister in front of you Thumbs Up


it was a joke, my boss even admitted that he LIED to me!!
BUT, as I stupidly believed his "promises" when he set me on and had NO written contract, it was, "dont let the door hit you in the arse on the way out"
old hippy guy
quote:
Originally posted by old hippy guy:
quote:
Originally posted by Bigdaddyostrich:
quote:
Originally posted by old hippy guy:
quote:
Originally posted by Bigdaddyostrich:
In my limited experience of employment tribunal cases, unions and their shop stewards are only too happy to drop their members like a sack of bricks when the going gets tough


well, I once tried to take a boss to a tribunal WITHOUT a union behind me....the boss I was talking about earlier as it happens,....needless to say I failed...and so did the appeal Nod


should have tried it with a decent barrister in front of you Thumbs Up


it was a joke, my boss even admitted that he LIED to me!!
BUT, as I stupidly believed his "promises" when he set me on and had NO written contract, it was, "dont let the door hit you in the arse on the way out"


Nasty places. A court by another name, equally as intimidating and procedures equally as complex. But no legal aid and no recovery of costs if successful
bigdaddyostrich
quote:
Originally posted by Daniel J*:
quote:
Originally posted by Garage Joe:
quote:
Originally posted by Daniel J*:
I'm also all for fining or punishing people for not voting.

*click* Heil!

Why not? It's a civic duty, like jury service. Even if the vote is none of the above or a message across the voting form. I've done the latter before now. Ninja
It is compulsory here. My husband got fined last year Laugh
PG
quote:
Originally posted by Daniel J*:
quote:
Originally posted by Mazzystar:
It upsets me when they still get such a bad press.They work very much alongside bosses rather than against them.And we take for granted many of the benfits they negotiated for us for granted.

My brother's a shop steward, for my sins. Ninja

Union relations are generally much, much better now, of course, than in the 70s. We have a staff council where I work instead of a union. The union tried to set up but no-one was interested.

Speaking of industrial action and given that the weather is turning out nice, isn't it time the French air traffic controllers went on strike again? Smiler


So's my OH!!

BDO,sorry about your experience of Trades Unions.Mines very different.My OH happily represents anyone even if they only join the union to face a tribunal Smiler
M
quote:
Originally posted by Penny Gabrielwise:
quote:
Originally posted by Daniel J*:
quote:
Originally posted by Garage Joe:
quote:
Originally posted by Daniel J*:
I'm also all for fining or punishing people for not voting.

*click* Heil!

Why not? It's a civic duty, like jury service. Even if the vote is none of the above or a message across the voting form. I've done the latter before now. Ninja
It is compulsory here. My husband got fined last year Laugh


personaly I think voting SHOULD be compulsory, it is not only a right but a DUTY,
but, there should have to be a "none of the above" option on the balot, good men and women fought and died for you right to a free vote, if you wish to register a protest or dont wish to vote for any candidate then you tick the "none of the above" box,...simples Nod
old hippy guy
quote:
Originally posted by Mazzystar:
So's my OH!!

BDO,sorry about your experience of Trades Unions.Mines very different.My OH happily represents anyone even if they only join the union to face a tribunal Smiler


Good for him!

not so long ago I had to get a witness summons for a shop steward who refused to come without one. For 2 chaps who had paid their dues for over 20 years Smiler
bigdaddyostrich
quote:
Originally posted by Bigdaddyostrich:
quote:
Originally posted by Mazzystar:
So's my OH!!

BDO,sorry about your experience of Trades Unions.Mines very different.My OH happily represents anyone even if they only join the union to face a tribunal Smiler


Good for him!

not so long ago I had to get a witness summons for a shop steward who refused to come without one. For 2 chaps who had paid their dues for over 20 years Smiler


That stinks Frowner
M
quote:
Originally posted by Garage Joe:
What do you mean "for your sins?" my Marmite hating friend. You should be proud.
Union relations are only better from the perspective of the boss class employers because they have workers over a barrel. The union of HR scum depts. regularly meet up and share ideas on how to spread misinformation. They don't care. They are evil!
I hope that you never need a Union, well respected fellow warrior against yeast based products.

My brother is a Tory voter too. I'm the black sheep of the family there, being a Liberal and inclined to vote LibDem when I'm not being tactical.

I think industrial relations now are good for the country at large. Large organisations are interested in public relations and bad industrial relations are bad for public relations and investor confidence. The relationship between labour force and management and share holders will always be in flux because of the changing economic environment. It mustn't distort too much one way or the other, is all.

And we really mustn't end up with wage inflation again because of overly powerful unions. In the early 70s, the NUM with Scargill rising in its ranks, held the country over a barrel with its 45% pay demand and mass picketing. Stuff like that can't be a good thing. Is it any wonder Thatcher was determined to stop it happening again? That was practically a challenge to law and order itself.
FM
quote:
Originally posted by Daniel J*:
quote:
Originally posted by Garage Joe:
What do you mean "for your sins?" my Marmite hating friend. You should be proud.
Union relations are only better from the perspective of the boss class employers because they have workers over a barrel. The union of HR scum depts. regularly meet up and share ideas on how to spread misinformation. They don't care. They are evil!
I hope that you never need a Union, well respected fellow warrior against yeast based products.

My brother is a Tory voter too. I'm the black sheep of the family there, being a Liberal and inclined to vote LibDem when I'm not being tactical.

I think industrial relations now are good for the country at large. Large organisations are interested in public relations and bad industrial relations are bad for public relations and investor confidence. The relationship between labour force and management and share holders will always be in flux because of the changing economic environment. It mustn't distort too much one way or the other, is all.

And we really mustn't end up with wage inflation again because of overly powerful unions. In the early 70s, the NUM with Scargill rising in its ranks, held the country over a barrel with its 45% pay demand and mass picketing. Stuff like that can't be a good thing. Is it any wonder Thatcher was determined to stop it happening again? That was practically a challenge to law and order itself.



.... and I say again, industrial relations are not good for the country at large. They are good for the people who have an interest in continuing a laissez faire capitalist economy. There is no industry. There are no effective unions. Most workers are now reliant for their information from corrupt HR people. When I first started they were called the personel department and they actually looked after the workforce.
I believe that the American entertainer Clint Eastwood had it right when he said in those imortal words, "Don't piss up my back and tell me it's raining!"
Garage Joe
quote:
Originally posted by Garage Joe:
.... and I say again, industrial relations are not good for the country at large. They are good for the people who have an interest in continuing a laissez faire capitalist economy. There is no industry. There are no effective unions. Most workers are now reliant for their information from corrupt HR people. When I first started they were called the personel department and they actually looked after the workforce.
I believe that the American entertainer Clint Eastwood had it right when he said in those imortal words, "Don't piss up my back and tell me it's raining!"

Well, the reason Scargill and his fellow Marxists and Trots were fighting an already outdated class war even back then is that most of us are members of either the affluent working class or the middle class and both of those classes aren't really classes anyway. We don't have a class consciousness mainly because we don't have shared interests. To paraphrase something earlier, we are the companies. Workers often own the companies, either through share holdings or through their pensions, and middle managers are essentially just workers.

You're right about the Personnel department and the Human Resources department. Do people actually think HR is Personnel now? I certainly don't and haven't for a long time. The HR department where I work is pretty incompetent and we end up telling them the correct position in employment law. I worked with someone who mistakenly thought HR was Personnel and she became a Personnel Issue before being made redundant.
FM
I wish you wouldn't keep referring to Scargill and his fellow Marxists and Trots.
Scargill was doing a job representing the Union. I say again, he wouldn't know the difference between a Marxist, a Leninist, a Marxist Leninist, a Trotskyist, or a Stakhanovite, though to be fair I'm not sure about the latter either.
At times like this I am reminded of the Ken Dodd material....
What a wonderful day! What a wonderful day for going to the Kremlin, knocking on the door, and saying, "Is Len in?"
Garage Joe
quote:
Originally posted by Daniel J*:
We don't have a class consciousness mainly because we don't have shared interests.


I dont think that was true at the time.If you lived in a mining community there was very much a collective conciousness.It is the destruction of that core of working class values that Thatcher is so despised for,particularly bypeople who lived there.It wasn't just jobs that were lost.And,to me,thats significant.
M
quote:
Originally posted by Mazzystar:
quote:
Originally posted by Daniel J*:
We don't have a class consciousness mainly because we don't have shared interests.


I dont think that was true at the time.If you lived in a mining community there was very much a collective conciousness.It is the destruction of that core of working class values that Thatcher is so despised for,particularly bypeople who lived there.It wasn't just jobs that were lost.And,to me,thats significant.


Nod Clapping
Queen of the High Teas
quote:
Originally posted by Garage Joe:
I wish you wouldn't keep referring to Scargill and his fellow Marxists and Trots.
Scargill was doing a job representing the Union. I say again, he wouldn't know the difference between a Marxist, a Leninist, a Marxist Leninist, a Trotskyist, or a Stakhanovite, though to be fair I'm not sure about the latter either.

He was a member of the Communist Party at one point and had strong Marxist views as far as I can tell. He certainly talked the talk about the working class and the ruling class and he was clearly a revolutionary. He was also instrumental in bringing Kinnock down and putting Tony Blair in power in the longer term, ironically.
FM
quote:
Originally posted by Mazzystar:
quote:
Originally posted by Daniel J*:
We don't have a class consciousness mainly because we don't have shared interests.

I dont think that was true at the time.If you lived in a mining community there was very much a collective conciousness.It is the destruction of that core of working class values that Thatcher is so despised for,particularly bypeople who lived there.It wasn't just jobs that were lost.And,to me,thats significant.

Yes, but the country as a whole was changing even back then. That's basically what I'm saying. It was a swan song for the Trots and probably an inevitable outcome. The country couldn't have gone on like that and I doubt very much that a radical left-wing revolution would have happened successfully. I agree entirely that the devastation caused by that struggle was horrible and traumatic for the people and communities involved. I'm just not sure the country would have got out of its mire without a radical like Thatcher.
FM

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×