Skip to main content

quote:
Originally posted by Suzi-Q:

I don't know, is it something in our DNA that makes us WANT or NEED to show our dominance or superiority over another person? Or is it just our ever increasing need of oil that causes us to invade oil rich countries that have shown no overt threat but may do because some idiot thinks they are a threat?


And don't you think that there's a hell of a lot of anti-Muslim stuff in the press because of governments rather than the common man? I think a lot of it is bollocks. I live in an area which is 50/50 white/ asian. Businesses and neighbours and kids go on as normal...a lot of so-called racial tension is trumped up in the name of political propaganda. How many of us here thought of the Germans (they bombed our chippy) as baddies as kids 20/30 years after the war?

Having said that, there was a fatal shooting in a neighbouring area to me last Wednesday (RIP James) and the Jamaican kids and the Somali kids who live there are always at each other. No amount of well meaning liberals will sort that. We need coppers on the streets doing weapons checks. That's common sense.
fracas
quote:
Originally posted by Suzi-Q:


I have tried to make the same point before. We have extremists everywhere declaring that their views are right and if we don't believe as they do, we will burn in hell.



You might like this

Landover Baptist

It's actually run by an American atheist and is an obvious parody, but some eejits think it's real and get it shut down now and again (SAFE FUNNY LINK, MODS)

Enjoy!
fracas
Feed them all to the lions, I say!

It's ironic, really. When I lived in North Carolina, there was this big Christian rally in the University stadium and I was asked if I would interpret (sign language). Now, I'm not averse to earning a bit of overtime, but was going away for the weekend. My boss made a joke about the lions and the Christians, and a fellow staff member, who was a devout Christian, had no idea what she was referring to.

A lot of time, people spout the same old rhetoric and have no idea what they are spouting or why, yet continue to spout the same old catch phrases.

Sometimes I think what we need is a good old space invasion, Doctor Who style, so we can come together as Earthings and have a common enemy. Perhaps then it will become apparent that we are more the same than different.
FM
quote:
Originally posted by Daniel J*:

[quote]When I was a kid, people used to call people in wheelchairs 'handicapped' probably without thinking about it and almost certainly without malice. Of course, wheelchair users are handicapped when presented with a set of stairs. They're probably no more handicapped than me though when sat at a desk using a computer. Yet I was defined by being normal and they were defined as being handicapped. That's not Orwellian newspeak to discourage people from seeing wheelchair users as 'the handicapped' and encouraging people to see beyond the wheelchair to what they are actually able to do. Negative to positive, you see.



When I was young the term in use was cripple. It then changed to handicapped. Now it's been changed yet again to disabled. I can't keep up! I don't have a problem with any of those terms. As as child we raised money for crippled children in school. When I was a young mum my daughter was diagnosed as being autistic and deaf, and we were told she was handicapped. She attended Lochaber Handicapped Association, but also was in the Special Unit at the local High School and also attended the local Riding for the Disabled Association. All those different terms, it's far too confusing! It hasn't changed the fact that she has autism and is deaf.

I use a wheelchair so I am disabled but now I'm not crippled and not handicapped. I wonder what I will be next year? I will still be using a wheelchair though.

I must take you to task on your comment regarding "they're not being more handicapped than you when sat at a computer" though. Many wheelchair users have numerous health issues, myself included, and there's no way I could sit at a conventional desk in front of a conventional computer for instance.

The whole disability malarky is far more complex than just being deaf or blind or mentally challenged or being a wheelchair user etc. There's no black and white, everyone is different, everyone is unique, just like every other person on the planet, whether disabled or ablebodied and that's why it's daft to generalise in that way.
B
quote:
Originally posted by fracas:
quote:
Originally posted by Daniel J*:
quote:
Originally posted by fracas:
Sometimes it's better to keep schtum because the pat reply seems to imply some sort of prejudice

Ironic, really, given the pat reply was to the pat label PC Brigade.


It's in the thread title, and Suzi asked what it meant. You replied saying it was a phrase used by people, usually racists. Check your post. I quoted it.

Anyway Dan, what kind of arrogance is it of anyone to tell people how to think? I knew the word 'P*ki' was horrible in the 70s and had the intelligence and judgement not to use it. Some of us great unwashed can tell right from wrong ourselves! Imagine! A lot of the resentment towards the thought police (a term you 'gratefully' accepted yourself) is based on the mistaken assumption that grown-ups need telling how to think. Your posts smack of an exasperated parent trying to get through to a child. Doesn't the reaction of many people to Marcus's 'up yours' to BB tell you something?

I like you Deej, don't get me wrong, but just think, maybe, political correctness (for want of a better phrase) has its detractors for a reason?


Great post! Clapping
B
quote:
Originally posted by Daniel J*:
quote:
Originally posted by china:
i object-and so do many others of my 'ilk' to people thinking they know whats good for me-they bloody do not Big Grin

Have you considered that it's not just for the good of your ilk, as you put it. Certain ethnic groups, Bangladeshi for example, do less well on average than other ethnic groups, such as East African Indians. Well meaning, say, educational achievement and employment status. Should we, as a society and our government, simply ignore that? What if that difference breeds resentment and it causes social unrest. As it has done in the past. What if more social security payments need to be meted out to that group? What causes the difference? A inherent stupidity in Bangladeshis? An internal cultural issue? A bias against them by the local population or the state system? That's all on top of the loss of potential we as a whole might be experiencing as far as industry innovation, academic research, or tax revenues are concerned.


right, this is my last go,

my 'ilk' do NOT want you or your 'ilk' to stand up for us
we are more than capable to do this for ourselves
we DO NOT want you to keep pointing out this and that, we are NOT f*cking stupid
and if anyone on this forum is of a different culture to the people who keep sticking up for us would you please back me up
im so far from this pc bollox its unreal
i live here, its my home and thats it
God save the queen
china
quote:
Originally posted by tupps:
I have had some delicious roast chicken (herb crusted and rustled up by my own fair hand).. I planned on a sensible debatey type post but now I'm too full and I'm watching a particularly funny episode of Most Haunted..

Suffice to say.. intent.. it is the nucleus..


which one?
i mean most haunted not which chicken Wink
china
quote:
Originally posted by china:
quote:
Originally posted by tupps:
I have had some delicious roast chicken (herb crusted and rustled up by my own fair hand).. I planned on a sensible debatey type post but now I'm too full and I'm watching a particularly funny episode of Most Haunted..

Suffice to say.. intent.. it is the nucleus..


which one?
i mean most haunted not which chicken Wink


Morecambe Winter Gardens theatre.. I'm 'cited..

The chicken was some kind of Sainsbury's Taste the Difference Red summat or other malarkey.. lush.. Valentine
tupps
quote:
Originally posted by china:


my 'ilk' do NOT want you or your 'ilk' to stand up for us


Thumbs Up

Staggering arrogance and condescension.

There's an interesting post from earlier:

quote:
It's not like Orwell's Newspeak at all. There isn't a move to limit the dictionary, or reduce the total number of words, or remove nuance by getting rid of synonyms and antomyms. Orwell simply understood the power of words and the theory behind changing the way people think about stuff by changing labels, and put it into a totalitarian backdrop.


Nowt to do with synonyms and antonyms, they're just superfluous words to make a frankly unintentionally scary point.

I do not need this kind of 'guidance'.

Disappointed
fracas
Last edited {1}
quote:
Originally posted by PinkBabe1966:
With reagrd to your comment about immigrants learning English before they come to this country, surely it makes sense to have a working knowledge of the language of the country you are going to live in before becoming a resident of that country. It makes my blood boil when you hear of people who have gone to live in France or Spain who don't learn the language first.



My point was, surely it's slightly absurd and rude to then rip the piss out of their accents, seeing as they've gone to all that effort?
Blizz'ard
quote:
Originally posted by Blizzie:



My point was, surely it's slightly absurd and rude to then rip the piss out of their accents, seeing as they've gone to all that effort?


I went to all the effort of moving from Lancashire to Yorkshire. I get cries of 'Wanky Lancashire' in t'pub and then they go, 'Wuuur's the bewk, over thuur by the cewker'.

It keeps me awake at night.

Where's me Uncle Joe's Mint Balls?

Crying
fracas
quote:
Originally posted by *BB*:
I must take you to task on your comment regarding "they're not being more handicapped than you when sat at a computer" though. Many wheelchair users have numerous health issues, myself included, and there's no way I could sit at a conventional desk in front of a conventional computer for instance.

What is it with this quoting thing? What I actually said was:

"They're probably no more handicapped than me though when sat at a desk using a computer"

I put the "probably" in because I am well aware that a wheelchair user may have many other health issues. Whether a wheelchair user might also have neck vertebrae problems, and I might have RSI problems, isn't really the point of what I was saying, was it?
FM
quote:
Originally posted by china:
right, this is my last go,

my 'ilk' do NOT want you or your 'ilk' to stand up for us
we are more than capable to do this for ourselves
we DO NOT want you to keep pointing out this and that, we are NOT f*cking stupid
and if anyone on this forum is of a different culture to the people who keep sticking up for us would you please back me up
im so far from this pc bollox its unreal
i live here, its my home and thats it
God save the queen

Laugh

What ilk am I again?
FM
quote:
Originally posted by Daniel J*:
What is it with this quoting thing? What I actually said was:

"They're probably no more handicapped than me though when sat at a desk using a computer"


Which, to be fair, is essentially what BB was saying. Nitpicking doesn't change that.

quote:
I put the "probably" in because I am well aware that a wheelchair user may have many other health issues. Whether a wheelchair user might also have neck vertebrae problems, and I might have RSI problems, isn't really the point of what I was saying, was it?


That is just mental. Sorry, cerebrally challenged.

I think *BB* has more authority to speak on this, and no amount of theorising changes that.

This is what makes me Crazy

Nod
fracas
quote:
Originally posted by Rekaf:
it was always believed that black kids did not do as well as white kids, some people blamed the teachers who they say (unwittingly) thought the black kids would not do as well anyway so did not push them, if you remember, trevor phillips came in for some severe stick when he suggested that the problem could be that some black kids may condider that its not 'cool' to get good marks, now, last week we are told that its the white males who are lagging behind just about everyone....whats going on?, what can we believe, we are all quoting different sources who is telling the truth, but apart from all this, is it possible that some kids are cleverer than others....is it possible that some kids are more artistic than others, is it possible that some kids revel in the abstract rigidity of maths and some would rather create a story..i'm not talking about ethnic groups just individual children, why this obsession with uniformity, i have read and heard so many contradictions that my head spins with it all, pc is about equality and uniformity its about not calling someone an imbecile or retarded but saying they have 'learning difficulties'...swapping one label for another because when wayne goes to the corner shop and beats the crap out of the owner, he isn't a violent thug, he has 'learning difficulties'...i'm all for helping people but calling a blind man visually challenged doesn't help him, you think that by changing labels you will change thought and thereby change perceptions, you wont......rant over goodnight.

Where to start with this? Yes, some kids are more artistic than others, some are cleverer than others, and so on. When people talk about equality in this context, they're talking about equality of access, equality of opportunity, and so on, rather than equality as uniformity of people. I thinking what you're actually railing against is the left-wing political philosophy of the 20th century. A slightly bigger topic, really, than the tool of political correctness used to shake up some stagnant thinking every now and again.
FM
quote:
Originally posted by Daniel J*:

Where to start with this? Yes, some kids are more artistic than others, some are cleverer than others, and so on. When people talk about equality in this context, they're talking about equality of access, equality of opportunity, and so on, rather than equality as uniformity of people. I thinking what you're actually railing against is the left-wing political philosophy of the 20th century. A slightly bigger topic, really, than the tool of political correctness used to shake up some stagnant thinking every now and again.


Isn't that of any importance then? You think it's an issue for another thread, I don't though. It's a comfortable luxury to quote ideology at those living the lives you are talking about. What kind of equality are you talking about here because you're sounding selective.We hadposts about quotas of certain nationalities in the workplace being inequal, so what about fairness and equality of opportunity elsewhere? For all your theorising, it's quite fragmented when convenient.
fracas
quote:
Originally posted by Daniel J*:
quote:
Originally posted by fracas:
That is just mental. Sorry, cerebrally challenged.

I think *BB* has more authority to speak on this, and no amount of theorising changes that.

This is what makes me Crazy

Nod

Lordy, it's like herding cats. Ninja


Don't you think *BB* has more idea about disability than you then?
fracas
quote:
Originally posted by fracas:
quote:
Originally posted by Daniel J*:
quote:
Originally posted by fracas:
That is just mental. Sorry, cerebrally challenged.

I think *BB* has more authority to speak on this, and no amount of theorising changes that.

This is what makes me Crazy

Nod

Lordy, it's like herding cats. Ninja


Don't you think *BB* has more idea about disability than you then?


She has an idea of her disability.. how it may impinge on her.. but I hardly think she is able to speak for every person living with a disability.. and how do you know what Daniel's circumstances are.


Possibly a person suffering from say quadriplegia would have more difficulty sitting at a desk and using a computer than say someone suffering from paraplegia.. and there will be differences in the user ability of each set, sub-set.. etc..

I doubt anyone on here is qualified to say with any certainty what anyone else's experience is. That is why it is opinion.
tupps
quote:
Originally posted by Suzi-Q:
If "Sooty" was offended, he could have made a mint.

It's okay you know, you don't have to put "" around his now well-known nickname. Unless you're uncomfortable with it yourself of course. Ninja

I don't know the man but I suspect that a cheque from a media hack for his story wouldn't be high on his priorities. He's hangs around with the heir to the throne at the polo club. Money just can't buy that sort of access, dahling.

The story was just a convenient media thing to give the other story at the time some legs. I wonder though how and where he first got the nickname. You can see how a bald man on a building site ends up being called, say, Curly.
FM
quote:
Originally posted by fracas:
quote:
Originally posted by Daniel J*:
quote:
Originally posted by fracas:
That is just mental. Sorry, cerebrally challenged.

I think *BB* has more authority to speak on this, and no amount of theorising changes that.

This is what makes me Crazy

Nod

Lordy, it's like herding cats. Ninja


Don't you think *BB* has more idea about disability than you then?

Quite possibly. At least about her disabilities anyway. Do you know what "it's like herding cats" means?

'Arguments from authority' have their place but my point was nothing to do what it's like to be disabled in a particular way. It was about switching to see what people with disabilities can do rather than simply seeing that as disabled and therefore seeing what they can't do.

Look:

"When I was a kid, people used to call people in wheelchairs 'handicapped' probably without thinking about it and almost certainly without malice. Of course, wheelchair users are handicapped when presented with a set of stairs. They're probably no more handicapped than me though when sat at a desk using a computer. Yet I was defined by being normal and they were defined as being handicapped. That's not Orwellian newspeak to discourage people from seeing wheelchair users as 'the handicapped' and encouraging people to see beyond the wheelchair to what they are actually able to do. Negative to positive, you see."

I don't mind tangents but I'm not being everyone's Straw Man for their own issues. How does I'm In A Wheelchair And I know More About Being In A Wheelchair More Than You have any impact on my quoted point?
FM

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×