Former Member
40 low match
Former Member
quote:Originally posted by evviva!:
let's do a LIST?
From memory.........
Cologne 37 ()
Yogi19 43
Tiddly~Wink 44
Songee 70
Evvi 73
tupps 75
STONKSY 96 (that's NINETY-SIX )
Quote ^^^^ and add yours, if you can be assed
quote:Originally posted by Tiddly~Wink:quote:Originally posted by evviva!:
let's do a LIST?
From memory.........
Cologne 37 ()
Yogi19 43
Tiddly~Wink 44
Songee 70
Evvi 73
tupps 75
STONKSY 96 (that's NINETY-SIX )
Quote ^^^^ and add yours, if you can be assed
I got 74 yes l am proud of my mach rate.
I did it again without the Julie Andrews influence and I got 84.. still less evil than the stonks..
Former Member
62
71 high mach. Fine by me...I'm in quite a benign frame of mind today.
quote:Originally posted by tupps:
I did it again without the Julie Andrews influence and I got 84.. still less evil than the stonks..
Do you think the lower scorers are more ebul cos they are not being honest?....
Former Member
quote:Originally posted by stonks:quote:Originally posted by tupps:
I did it again without the Julie Andrews influence and I got 84.. still less evil than the stonks..
Do you think the lower scorers are more ebul cos they are not being honest?....
quote:Originally posted by stonks:quote:Originally posted by tupps:
I did it again without the Julie Andrews influence and I got 84.. still less evil than the stonks..
Do you think the lower scorers are more ebul cos they are not being honest?....
Yes Sister Stonks of the Immaculate Perception.. yes I do..
quote:Originally posted by evviva!:quote:Originally posted by stonks:quote:Originally posted by tupps:
I did it again without the Julie Andrews influence and I got 84.. still less evil than the stonks..
Do you think the lower scorers are more ebul cos they are not being honest?....
I'll see your and raise you
quote:Originally posted by tupps:quote:Originally posted by stonks:quote:Originally posted by tupps:
I did it again without the Julie Andrews influence and I got 84.. still less evil than the stonks..
Do you think the lower scorers are more ebul cos they are not being honest?....
Yes Sister Stonks of the Immaculate Perception.. yes I do..
It must be hard to score that low....
Former Member
quote:Originally posted by stonks:quote:Originally posted by tupps:
I did it again without the Julie Andrews influence and I got 84.. still less evil than the stonks..
Do you think the lower scorers are more ebul cos they are not being honest?....
would I lie to you?
77 -
quote:Originally posted by Pengy:quote:Originally posted by stonks:quote:Originally posted by tupps:
I did it again without the Julie Andrews influence and I got 84.. still less evil than the stonks..
Do you think the lower scorers are more ebul cos they are not being honest?....
would I lie to you?
Not you Pengy....
quote:Originally posted by Pip*:
77 -
you are coming with us...
edit sorry wrong thread
quote:Originally posted by tupps:quote:Originally posted by cologne1:quote:Originally posted by Yogi 19:
I scored 43 Low Mach. Does that mean I`m an ?
DON'T listen to tubbs. Stick with me, we are the
I am not a miami cop and I do not wear shoulder pads..
Of course not....
quote:Originally posted by tupps:quote:Originally posted by stonks:quote:Originally posted by tupps:
I did it again without the Julie Andrews influence and I got 84.. still less evil than the stonks..
Do you think the lower scorers are more ebul cos they are not being honest?....
Yes Sister Stonks of the Immaculate Perception.. yes I do..
Oh cripes, we've been rumbled....
quote:Originally posted by Sarum:quote:Originally posted by tupps:quote:Originally posted by cologne1:quote:Originally posted by Yogi 19:
I scored 43 Low Mach. Does that mean I`m an ?
DON'T listen to tubbs. Stick with me, we are the
I am not a miami cop and I do not wear shoulder pads..
Of course not....
54 low mach
quote:Originally posted by Sarum:quote:Originally posted by tupps:quote:Originally posted by cologne1:quote:Originally posted by Yogi 19:
I scored 43 Low Mach. Does that mean I`m an ?
DON'T listen to tubbs. Stick with me, we are the
I am not a miami cop and I do not wear shoulder pads..
Of course not....
Its David in drag....
I got 34/100 'low mach'
48..... No wonder I'm a doormat!
Low Mach 50.
I got 57
not so bad
not so bad
quote:Originally posted by darloboy07:
Low Machs gather .
94.
quote:Originally posted by JacksonB:
94.
I think I love you...
i know.quote:Originally posted by tupps:quote:Originally posted by JacksonB:
94.
I think I love you...
quote:Originally posted by JacksonB:i know.quote:Originally posted by tupps:quote:Originally posted by JacksonB:
94.
I think I love you...
The end will always justify the means..
i knew you'd be back...quote:Originally posted by tupps:quote:Originally posted by JacksonB:i know.quote:Originally posted by tupps:quote:Originally posted by JacksonB:
94.
I think I love you...
The end will always justify the means..
quote:Originally posted by JacksonB:
i knew you'd be back...
Gone off you now..
Former Member
I think some of you must be deliberately TRYING to be evil now
Spongee, me and anyone else around the 70-75 mark are probably just about right Not low-score enough to be wearing Jesus Sandals and hugging trees. Not high enough to warrant a 666 tattoo on the forehead
Spongee, me and anyone else around the 70-75 mark are probably just about right Not low-score enough to be wearing Jesus Sandals and hugging trees. Not high enough to warrant a 666 tattoo on the forehead
quote:Originally posted by tupps:quote:Originally posted by JacksonB:
i knew you'd be back...
Gone off you now..
i ticked the boxes that would make me machiavellian and went middle on 2 boxes to make it more believable..quote:Originally posted by evviva!:
I think some of you must be deliberately TRYING to be evil now
Spongee, me and anyone else around the 70-75 mark are probably just about right Not low-score enough to be wearing Jesus Sandals and hugging trees. Not high enough to warrant a 666 tattoo on the forehead
Former Member
quote:Originally posted by JacksonB:i ticked the boxes that would make me machiavellian and went middle on 2 boxes to make it more believable..quote:Originally posted by evviva!:
I think some of you must be deliberately TRYING to be evil now
Spongee, me and anyone else around the 70-75 mark are probably just about right Not low-score enough to be wearing Jesus Sandals and hugging trees. Not high enough to warrant a 666 tattoo on the forehead
Flippin hell, no wonder you had the hots for old Dimple butt!
who?quote:Originally posted by evviva!:quote:Originally posted by JacksonB:i ticked the boxes that would make me machiavellian and went middle on 2 boxes to make it more believable..quote:Originally posted by evviva!:
I think some of you must be deliberately TRYING to be evil now
Spongee, me and anyone else around the 70-75 mark are probably just about right Not low-score enough to be wearing Jesus Sandals and hugging trees. Not high enough to warrant a 666 tattoo on the forehead
Flippin hell, no wonder you had the hots for old Dimple butt!
i can do it for real now, but tupps won't love me anymore.
I didn't love yas anyway.. how's THAT for machiavellian!
quote:Originally posted by tupps:quote:Originally posted by JacksonB:
94.
I think I love you...
Very mac..telling him what he want to hear....
quote:Originally posted by stonks:quote:Originally posted by tupps:quote:Originally posted by JacksonB:
94.
I think I love you...
Very mac..telling him what he want to hear....
^5 sistah
Add Reply
Sign In To Reply
89 online (1 member
/
88 guests),
0 chatting