oh jj with his threatening talk
Reference: Toid
Thick as mince, the pair of them
They`re trying to influence. Totally against the rules! Ban them BB... Ban them!
JJ said those who pretend to like everybody will struggle to nominate. Where as those who don't pretend will find it easier because they don't care.
Dave and JJ2 saying Sam will gunk them. Surely they must be punished for this.
JJ1 is deperate to find out who has been nominating him - so he can kick off at them, no doubt.
JJ1 is deperate to find out who has been nominating him - so he can kick off at them, no doubt.
Reference:
oh jj with his threatening talk
He's full of shit isn't he....the pillock....
BB just warned them all again not to discuss anything to do with noms.
Reference:
oh jj with his threatening talk
Whats he saying?
Why are they being allowed to openly talk like this ?
Reference:Scotty
They`re trying to influence. Totally against the rules!
...the rules Scotty? BB seems to chop and change them as it suits....**sigh**..I can honestly say I absolutely loathe John James, with Dave a close second....
hes shouting it out lets see whos been going for me. its intimidation hes trying to frighten them.
Reference:
Whats he saying?
He want to see if the ones who have been nomming him each week, have the guts to do it when it's face-to-face. There is an implied threat that he will kick off when he knows who has nommed him (IMO).
I hear no threats I hear curiosity about who's been nominating them for weeks.
Why be intimidated? The bloke's as spineless as a jellyfish. Stand up to him, HMs!
We are still waiting because Jo is back in the diary room. I really hope she's gone.
Bedroom: JJ Josie JJ2 Dave Sam..could be others but can`t see them....
JJ2 asking if Jo is out of the DR yet.
Someone out of camera shot (think it was Mario) says/sings " You`re talking about nominations"
JJ2 says...no, just the process
Corin says she `s still in there...she doesn`t want Jo to go.
JJ2 asking if Jo is out of the DR yet.
Someone out of camera shot (think it was Mario) says/sings " You`re talking about nominations"
JJ2 says...no, just the process
Corin says she `s still in there...she doesn`t want Jo to go.
you see it as i see it yogi?
i dont think they will deman i really hope im wrong though
i dont think they will deman i really hope im wrong though
Reference:
I hear no threats I hear curiosity about who's been nominating them for weeks.
I consider his "Let's see if they have the balls to do it when it's face-to-face" comment (or words to that effect) to be a veiled threat. But that's just my opinion.Reference:
you see it as i see it yogi?
I sure do, Justa.
Reference:
I consider his "Let's see if they have the balls to do it when it's face-to-face" comment (or words to that effect) to be a veiled threat. But that's just my opinion.
Well that's your opinion. I don't consider it a threat just a turn of phrase.Reference:
Well that's your opinion. I don't consider it a threat just a turn of phrase.
I know it is, that's why I said "that's just my opinion".
Reference:
I consider his "Let's see if they have the balls to do it when it's face-to-face" comment (or words to that effect) to be a veiled threat. But that's just my opinion.
I'd consider that a threat, because he's implying there'll be consequences. And what are they, then? 
Reference:
I consider his "Let's see if they have the balls to do it when it's face-to-face" comment (or words to that effect) to be a veiled threat. But that's just my opinion.
An opinion I agree with Yogi...Why does that barsteward bullying pillock feel it takes *Balls* to nom him,they all nom,it's part of the BB experience yet he obviously feels HM's are so intimidated they need *Balls* to nom him.
and this is why steve and mario couldnt replace who they nominated in the save task.
Reference: Yogi
I consider his "Let's see if they have the balls to do it when it's face-to-face" comment (or words to that effect) to be a veiled threat. But that's just my opinion.
The tone of his voice and the expression on his face certainly seemed very threatening to me! He didn't have the balls to say balls, he wanted to them to show their stones! Reference:
I'd consider that a threat, because he's implying there'll be consequences. And what are they, then?
They will feel the wrath of John James, as in a relentless rant/interrogation.Reference:
The tone of his voice and the expression on his face certainly seemed very threatening to me!
The tone of his voice and the expression on his face never changes even if he is happy, sad or angry.
Is Jo still in the DR ?
I'm not watching so can't see the expression etc, but I'd not automatically take the 'balls' comment as a threat. If he used the word 'guts' would it be different? He may just mean, who's got the courage of their convictions when they have to do it openly.. i.e. when they know they'll be seen to have been nice to his face, but nomming him in the diary room. Just a suggestion to throw in the pot...
Reference:
Is Jo still in the DR ?
She's out now Skylark, and she says she's okay now.
she out skylark and staying
Jo is back and not leaving. But I think she is praying she goes on Friday.
Thanks x
Reference:
I'm not watching so can't see the expression etc, but I'd not automatically take the 'balls' comment as a threat. If he used the word 'guts' would it be different? He may just mean, who's got the courage of their convictions when they have to do it openly.. i.e. when they know they'll be seen to have been nice to his face, but nomming him in the diary room. Just a suggestion to throw in the pot...
....Or why not speak in general terms,will everyone have the *Balls* to do it this way,nooooo he specifies *Balls* to nom HIM.
I take it they'll have to write the names down first? To ensure that they don't influence votes.
Reference:
I'm not watching so can't see the expression etc, but I'd not automatically take the 'balls' comment as a threat. If he used the word 'guts' would it be different? He may just mean, who's got the courage of their convictions when they have to do it openly.. i.e. when they know they'll be seen to have been nice to his face, but nomming him in the diary room. Just a suggestion to throw in the pot.
He said stones not balls. which is an Aussie term for balls. The way you described it is what I saw.Reference:
I take it they'll have to write the names down first? To ensure that they don't influence votes.
I hope so, Maths.Reference: DD
the rules Scotty? BB seems to chop and change them as it suits....**sigh**..I can honestly say I absolutely loathe John James, with Dave a close second
I can`t choose between them DD. I`m hoping BB are purposely letting them and anyone else who`s talked about it...carry on.
Then they announce that they`re banned from nominating.
I know..I`m living in a dream world.
Reference:
I know..I`m living in a dream world.
I'm sharing that dream, Scotty.
If anyone has a link to live feed can they pm me please
