I for one couldn't understand why the rest didn't do what Rody did, and VOTE?!

Lisa and David would have been up and the others would have been saved.

But this way is good also, at least we have a chance at that *****ead Charlie.

Rodrigo nominated Lisa and David, and David asked them to put him up

quote:

Originally posted by Skylark24:
Rodrigo nominated Lisa and David, and David asked them to put him up

Which misses the point

quote:

Originally posted by Cold Sweat:

quote:

Originally posted by Skylark24:
Rodrigo nominated Lisa and David, and David asked them to put him up

Which misses the point

why?

It's all bobbins. They're there to nominate, and they should. If certain HMs get the hump with that, maybe they're on the wrong show.

quote:

Originally posted by Skylark24:

quote:

Originally posted by Cold Sweat:

quote:

Originally posted by Skylark24:
Rodrigo nominated Lisa and David, and David asked them to put him up

Which misses the point

why?

It wasn't about putting anyone up - it was the exact reverse.

quote:

Originally posted by Demantoid:
It's all bobbins. They're there to nominate, and they should. If certain HMs get the hump with that, maybe they're on the wrong show.

of course they should, every other Hm in previous years have had too, dont know why this lot think they are so special

quote:

Originally posted by Skylark24:

quote:

Originally posted by Demantoid:
It's all bobbins. They're there to nominate, and they should. If certain HMs get the hump with that, maybe they're on the wrong show.

of course they should, every other Hm in previous years have had too, dont know why this lot think they are so special

Charlie was the one well and truly caught out and I think he was hoping everyone would follow his lead and not nominate . I can't stand how Siavash gets on his moral high horse about voting yet he voted Lisa more times than he admitted. He's a sneaky tw@t alright and his face when they showed him nominating Lisa was a pic! A mixture of purple and bright red. Everything he morally believed in crashed and burnt right there and showed him up to be nothing but a two faced drama queen!

quote:

Originally posted by Lord Lucan:

quote:

Originally posted by Skylark24:

quote:

Originally posted by Demantoid:
It's all bobbins. They're there to nominate, and they should. If certain HMs get the hump with that, maybe they're on the wrong show.

of course they should, every other Hm in previous years have had too, dont know why this lot think they are so special

Charlie was the one well and truly caught out and I think he was hoping everyone would follow his lead and not nominate . I can't stand how Siavash gets on his moral high horse about voting yet he voted Lisa more times than he admitted. He's a sneaky tw@t alright and his face when they showed him nominating Lisa was a pic! A mixture of purple and bright red. Everything he morally believed in crashed and burnt right there and showed him up to be nothing but a two faced drama queen!

Charlie wouldve nominated, he just didnt know what he was nominating for, winner or what. Yes Siavash was well caught out, even his pal Sophie was a bit shocked

quote:

Originally posted by Skylark24:

quote:

Originally posted by Demantoid:
It's all bobbins. They're there to nominate, and they should. If certain HMs get the hump with that, maybe they're on the wrong show.

of course they should, every other Hm in previous years have had too, dont know why this lot think they are so special

100% agree - thats a 'fundamental rule' if you dont do it you should be evicted.

There is breaking the rules for living in the house as they are just arse covering H&S rules.
Nominating is a fundemental foundation of the game, failure to comply should mean instant disqualification.

quote:

Originally posted by Cold Sweat:
But that is exactly what they came up against.

Given that the housemates vote in alphabetical order, and given that they are allowed to discuss nominations; Rodrigo, Siavash and Sophie could have stitched them up completely – had they been that way inclined. Not nominating – under those circumstances was the fairest way – an honest person would see this!

Well thier both thick as planks so we really can't expect much.

Charlie couldnt nominate as lisa hadnt told him who to pick.....lisa and dave are too dense to realise that siavash and sophie did them a favour.

quote:

Originally posted by Demantoid:
It's all bobbins. They're there to nominate, and they should. If certain HMs get the hump with that, maybe they're on the wrong show.

As soon as Siavash refused to nominate weeks ago he should have been kicked out and replaced with new HM's.

Wonder how many would have refused then?!

quote:

Originally posted by Lord Lucan:

quote:

Originally posted by Skylark24:

quote:

Originally posted by Demantoid:
It's all bobbins. They're there to nominate, and they should. If certain HMs get the hump with that, maybe they're on the wrong show.

of course they should, every other Hm in previous years have had too, dont know why this lot think they are so special

Charlie was the one well and truly caught out and I think he was hoping everyone would follow his lead and not nominate . I can't stand how Siavash gets on his moral high horse about voting yet he voted Lisa more times than he admitted. He's a sneaky tw@t alright and his face when they showed him nominating Lisa was a pic! A mixture of purple and bright red. Everything he morally believed in crashed and burnt right there and showed him up to be nothing but a two faced drama queen!

why then, when the nominations footage was shown, did Siavash ask her to listen to what he said. He did not go back on anything he said, he said in effect that he felt the same way now as he felt back in week ? (whichever week they were discussing). He denied nothing, and he was not embarrassed. He said he had got the number of times he nominated her incorrect, which was a normal thing to happen and to admit to.

quote:

Originally posted by Twee Surgeon:

quote:

Originally posted by Lord Lucan:

quote:

Originally posted by Skylark24:

It's all bobbins. They're there to nominate, and they should. If certain HMs get the hump with that, maybe they're on the wrong show.

of course they should, every other Hm in previous years have had too, dont know why this lot think they are so special

Charlie was the one well and truly caught out and I think he was hoping everyone would follow his lead and not nominate . I can't stand how Siavash gets on his moral high horse about voting yet he voted Lisa more times than he admitted. He's a sneaky tw@t alright and his face when they showed him nominating Lisa was a pic! A mixture of purple and bright red. Everything he morally believed in crashed and burnt right there and showed him up to be nothing but a two faced drama queen!

why then, when the nominations footage was shown, did Siavash ask her to listen to what he sahttp://gagajoyjoy.com/groupee_common/ver1.3.4.9627/platform_images/blank.gifid. He did not go back on anything he said, he said in effect that he felt the same way now as he felt back in week ? (whichever week they were discussing). He denied nothing, and he was not embarrassed. He said he had got the number of times he nominated her incorrect, which was a normal thing to happen and to admit to.[/QUOTE]

Spot on Twee, I also recorded last night's H/L show, exactly how it happened.

Absolutely right, Twee. And how nice (and fair) of BB to focus so heavily on his nominations.

quote:

Originally posted by Demantoid:
Absolutely right, Twee. And how nice (and fair) of BB to focus so heavily on his nominations.

Most odd !