Skip to main content

Originally Posted by Saint:

Shoot me down all you like.

I will maintian a healthy scepticism that most stuff is 'sexed up' for one reason or another.

That's all very well, but your post here came across very beligerantly.

 

'It's all lies and rubish for no other reason than I say it's lies' sort of thing.

A more reasoned approach would be better received.

 

I'm sure many of us take these things with a pinch of salt.

Extremely Fluffy Fluffy Thing
Originally Posted by Extremely Fluffy Fluffy Thing:
Originally Posted by Saint:

Shoot me down all you like.

I will maintian a healthy scepticism that most stuff is 'sexed up' for one reason or another.

That's all very well, but your post here came across very beligerantly.

 

'It's all lies and rubish for no other reason than I say it's lies' sort of thing.

A more reasoned approach would be better received.

 

I'm sure many of us take these things with a pinch of salt.

You're 'meant' to take it with a pinch of salt!!!

Its a side swipe - a roll of the eyes - a 'tut' at the world

I've told you  ... i'm only ever joking and never mean it in a negative mood.

Saint
Originally Posted by moonie:

I read somewhere that you cant date anything older than 4,000 years with any accuracy. So when we are told this or that is millions or billions of years old that simply is not true....

Dat a-boy Mooncake

They talkin' out their bottoms.

 

Another one ... "the flames leapt 100ft"

Were they there with a tape measure!!??

Saint
Originally Posted by moonie:

I read somewhere that you cant date anything older than 4,000 years with any accuracy. So when we are told this or that is millions or billions of years old that simply is not true....

... and you believed that???     

Kaffs
Originally Posted by moonie:

I read somewhere that you cant date anything older than 4,000 years with any accuracy. So when we are told this or that is millions or billions of years old that simply is not true....

But which bit's more untrue?

 

And we have a real conundrum if both bits are inaccurate!

Extremely Fluffy Fluffy Thing
Originally Posted by Saint:
Originally Posted by moonie:

I read somewhere that you cant date anything older than 4,000 years with any accuracy. So when we are told this or that is millions or billions of years old that simply is not true....

Dat a-boy Mooncake

They talkin' out their bottoms.

 

Another one ... "the flames leapt 100ft"

Were they there with a tape measure!!??

Moonie
Originally Posted by KaffyBaffy:
Originally Posted by moonie:

I read somewhere that you cant date anything older than 4,000 years with any accuracy. So when we are told this or that is millions or billions of years old that simply is not true....

... and you believed that???     

Moonie
Originally Posted by Rexi:
Originally Posted by Saint:

Just rollin' my eyes at the world Rexi

Its not to be taken negatively

I know ... keep up the good work

Now . . .are you winding me up there?

Saint
Originally Posted by Extremely Fluffy Fluffy Thing:
Originally Posted by moonie:

I read somewhere that you cant date anything older than 4,000 years with any accuracy. So when we are told this or that is millions or billions of years old that simply is not true....

But which bit's more untrue?

 

And we have a real conundrum if both bits are inaccurate!

Moonie
Originally Posted by Saint:
Originally Posted by Rexi:
Originally Posted by Saint:

Just rollin' my eyes at the world Rexi

Its not to be taken negatively

I know ... keep up the good work

Now . . .are you winding me up there?

Silly Billy, of course not

Rexi
Originally Posted by Rexi:
Originally Posted by Saint:
Originally Posted by Rexi:
Originally Posted by Saint:

Just rollin' my eyes at the world Rexi

Its not to be taken negatively

I know ... keep up the good work

Now . . .are you winding me up there?

Silly Billy, of course not

*passes key to Rexi* 

Moonie
Originally Posted by Yogi19:
Originally Posted by moonie:
Originally Posted by Saint:

Moonie says he's 27

 

 . . .the lies we are told

  

Sainty say he's 18 

Your noses are growing.

*hides nose* 

Moonie
Originally Posted by moonie:
Originally Posted by Yogi19:
Originally Posted by moonie:
Originally Posted by Saint:

Moonie says he's 27

 

 . . .the lies we are told

  

Sainty say he's 18 

Your noses are growing.

*hides nose* 

Too late! 

Yogi19
Originally Posted by Yogi19:
Originally Posted by moonie:
Originally Posted by Yogi19:
Originally Posted by moonie:
Originally Posted by Saint:

Moonie says he's 27

 

 . . .the lies we are told

  

Sainty say he's 18 

Your noses are growing.

*hides nose* 

Too late! 

Moonie
Originally Posted by Enthusiastic Contrafibularities:

 

 

Each year Ant & Dec win the same award on those TV thingy awards programme. How do we know Dec & Ant actually get those votes and it's not ITV fiddling it?

 

 its computer voting, I tells ya  

Moonie
Originally Posted by moonie:
Originally Posted by Enthusiastic Contrafibularities:

 

 

Each year Ant & Dec win the same award on those TV thingy awards programme. How do we know Dec & Ant actually get those votes and it's not ITV fiddling it?

 

 its computer voting, I tells ya  

 

 

Are you telling me that my computer places votes itself without my knowledge. Is my computer sentient? It's true, Skynet exists - were doomed !!!!

Enthusiastic Contrafibularities
Originally Posted by Enthusiastic Contrafibularities:
Originally Posted by moonie:
Originally Posted by Enthusiastic Contrafibularities:

 

 

Each year Ant & Dec win the same award on those TV thingy awards programme. How do we know Dec & Ant actually get those votes and it's not ITV fiddling it?

 

 its computer voting, I tells ya  

 

 

Are you telling me that my computer places votes itself without my knowledge. Is my computer sentient? It's true, Skynet exists - were doomed !!!!

Nah, just joking aren't I? 

Moonie

Research suggests the equivalent of 567 children took up smoking each day in 2011.

 

Why does it just "Suggest" ?? Don't they 'have' the figures??

 

MORE scare mongering that they CAN'T back up

Saint
Originally Posted by Extremely Fluffy Fluffy Thing:
Originally Posted by Saint:

Research suggests the equivalent of 567 children took up smoking each day in 2011.

 

 

What is the EQUIVALENT of a child?

I could give you an example... male... middle aged....

Kaffs
Originally Posted by Saint:

Research suggests the equivalent of 567 children took up smoking each day in 2011.

 

Why does it just "Suggest" ?? Don't they 'have' the figures??

 

MORE scare mongering that they CAN'T back up

Well I know half a dozen

Smoking Baby Animated Avatar 100x100Smoking Baby Animated Avatar 100x100

 

Smoking Baby Animated Avatar 100x100Smoking Baby Animated Avatar 100x100Smoking Baby Animated Avatar 100x100Smoking Baby Animated Avatar 100x100

Soozy Woo

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×