well... she is infuriating my daughter, who reckons she is posing & hair flicking to try & distract the [quote] "interrogators"..   

she finished off her little rant with a " pfft.... bloody postbox!"

Hahahahaha!

yogi

Ditty... what say the court shes right?

Hi Gypsie.

I was watching something last night and they were saying they suspect that he has been instructed to try to remain as quiet as possible because he is not good under pressure. They say he is inarticulate, set in his ways, doesn't like having to answer to anyone and likely to loose his temper.  Lets hope he doesn't listen to their advice.

Lol at Alan Sugar on twitter... thought he would soon be going beserk about all this questioning to an old man, he's a close mate of Rupert Murdoch.

Soooooo so far from Rupert we've had that he doesn't know people who he's employed for 20 years, he's cocking a deaf 'un to most questions (although given his age he could be hard of hearing but I'm not buying it)   he knows nothing, saw nothing and anything else James will answer 

Poor guy... 

...

Breaking News - Sky News

Gazza has been spotted near Westminster with a fishing rod, a chicken and some beer.

I've only just remembered to tune in. .where's the bit of stuff one of the murdochs was probably knocking off  red headed woman? 

Thought she was suppsoed to be part of the grilling too..  is she hiding in the post box someone posted earlier?

I don't think he is. He brought this stuff up in the House of Lords and when he subsequently went to Murdoch party, he was asked to leave.

hmmm.... and why was dom jolly questioning him? more questions than answers.

She is to be grilled after they've finished with the Murdochs.

She's due after these two Olly    She's prolly off hacking that hair of hers off so she won't be recognised walking into the building 

This is a corporate disaster  

Sell now!

Am I the only one who thinks Murdock jun looks and sounds a bit like John Malcovic (sp)?

cheers for the info re the Rebecca Brooks  guys. .forgot her name earlier

Rupert : "There are headlines that sometimes give offence but they`re not intentional."  

I don't think my brain is engaged today. .I hear noise I see mouths moving but I have no idea what anybody is saying

*turns TV volume up*

I wish they'd ask whoever is coughing to leave the room    or is it a plant to annoy us all or make what they're saying inaudible??? 

I think he sounds a bit like him.  

That's just like me Olly ... young James seems to be using 500 words where 5 will do, in the hope, I suppose of boring us all to tears 

Keep up with the Quantum facts Rexi - they're very important    I think 

'ello

But the questions are so stupid ... "What coaching have you had for this session?"

What's the point of that question? 

it's working with me ..I feel a nap coming on

Because Rexicles my lovely smiling face,  as I stated in my post up there ^^^^^^  The Murdochs appear to be replying to a script whereby they saw nothing, heard nothing and know nothing so in essence, they are being less than truthful and this chappie knows it and is pointing it out to James that he knows it  They've definitely been coached about what to respond to and when to play dumb 

Hiya  

Alright ... I promise to concentrate for a bit ... but I do wish someone had coached the panel so that their was some kind of cohesion and building-up of questioning, rather than a load of disjointed questions.

But ... I will be good now and promise to pay attention   

Strewth!!  That makes it alright then.

These people are so up themselves.....think what they say or do should never be questioned.

Changed my mind now ... this bloke is good

   see through the mist of James' words - they are meant to confuddle you 

Some of the questions are a bit disjointed but a lot of them are very relevant and aren't being answered because either Rupert doesn't remember, doesn't know or James wasn't working in the company at that time 

His questions are very pertinent  

Are they really citing confidentiality about Brookes' pay off????? 

BBC news ticker says Brooks and Hinton were asked to leave. .that's not what I heard the Murdochs say. .they said they resigned with no pressure on them to do so.. or did I miss something?

Bleeding News is rubbish whoever is doing it, the Murdochs or not..

ok am showing my ignorance of politics and related stuff here but what happens when this committee is finished asking questions?  What can they do? they aren't a court of law are they? 

do they sentence them to 6 of the best if found guilty of something or recommend it goes to criminal proceedings in which case is this not  a form of questioning but a kind of deposition to use ma USA phrase but without lawyers .. and if that's the case why not go straight to court and save money..

or am I rambling with no coherent thought process

i'll stop spamming this now. .time for a nap

I don't know the answer to your question

Have a good snooze Olly I'm off to dead-head some petunias

buga all same as last time I suspect.  They've been asked to answer questions which they (the Murdochs) have so far avoided and which others from News Corp avoided when this first was questioned many years ago.

They appear to be answering very little just in case they say something that they could be prosecuted for 

This is just an expensive waste of time financially and in air time but it gives the allusion that something is being done for the public - well that's my take on it anyway and whadda I know