Originally Posted by squiggle:
This came from the Huffington Post although I see it quotes The Sun
Three BBC staff tried to rape a TV extra as screen legend Leonard Rossiter performed a sex act nearby, it was claimed last night.
The late Rising Damp star has been drawn into the the Corporation's sex scandal amid claims he performed the act as the male 18-year-old extra was assaulted.
Rossiter, who died in 1984, was present for one of two sex attacks the then-teenager was subjected to,
Rossiter was performing in the BBC play The Year Of The Sex Olympics when the attacks are said to have occurred in a rehearsal room at the TV Centre in 1968.
The alleged victim told the newspaper of Rossiter: "He obviously found it all a big turn-on. He was watching with glee.
"The staff who attacked me were animals and thought they could get away with anything. It left me devastated and caused great stress. I get so angry just thinking about it."
Describing the BBC as a "cesspit of depravity" he added he had made a full statement to the police.
A BBC spokesman told The Sun: 'The BBC cannot comment on individual cases. It will help the police in any way it can in the course of any investigation.'
It is the latest sex scandal to befall the BBC since allegations about the behaviour of Jimmy Savile came to light.
I've been meaning to comment on this over the weekend, but haven't been able to do anything until now. A couple of unrelated points:
Firstly - and rather bizarrely - I've been discussing "The Year of the Sex Olympics" over the last week on another forum for completely unrelated reasons. In writing it, Nigel Kneale predicted a lot of the concepts and controversies behind reality TV, including BB.
Secondly - and more seriously - I doubt I'm the only one annoyed at the way this story (and others) are being presented in the press.
Now I'm not seeking to defend Rossiter if the accusations are true, but he's not one of the three alleged rapists. So why is he the only person named by the Sun? Is it because heâs the only one involved whoâs famous? Or is it because heâs the only one whoâs dead and therefore unable to sue?
Whichever it is, I find the implications rather worryingâĶ