Skip to main content

Originally Posted by Yogi19:

These revelations just get worse and worse.

It beggars belief that so many people were aware of/heard rumours/had suspicions about what Savile was doing - and yet nobody said or did anything to stop it. It's like some sort of conspiracy of silence, and I am baffled as to why Savile appears to have been untouchable.

Me too.. I'm getting more and more p'd off with all these people coming forward saying how the can't believe it took so long for it to be reported.     If they have first hand knowledge of an office or can corroborate an accusation, or help nail some living offender - go to the police.  Otherwise - why go to the papers and spout off about how terrible it all was?  I'd like to think I'd be too ashamed to say I knew about it and did nothing.

Kaffs
Originally Posted by KaffyBaffy:
Originally Posted by Yogi19:

These revelations just get worse and worse.

It beggars belief that so many people were aware of/heard rumours/had suspicions about what Savile was doing - and yet nobody said or did anything to stop it. It's like some sort of conspiracy of silence, and I am baffled as to why Savile appears to have been untouchable.

Me too.. I'm getting more and more p'd off with all these people coming forward saying how the can't believe it took so long for it to be reported.     If they have first hand knowledge of an office or can corroborate an accusation, or help nail some living offender - go to the police.  Otherwise - why go to the papers and spout off about how terrible it all was?  I'd like to think I'd be too ashamed to say I knew about it and did nothing.

Exactly!

 

Yogi19
Originally Posted by Yogi19:
Originally Posted by KaffyBaffy:
Originally Posted by Yogi19:

These revelations just get worse and worse.

It beggars belief that so many people were aware of/heard rumours/had suspicions about what Savile was doing - and yet nobody said or did anything to stop it. It's like some sort of conspiracy of silence, and I am baffled as to why Savile appears to have been untouchable.

Me too.. I'm getting more and more p'd off with all these people coming forward saying how the can't believe it took so long for it to be reported.     If they have first hand knowledge of an office or can corroborate an accusation, or help nail some living offender - go to the police.  Otherwise - why go to the papers and spout off about how terrible it all was?  I'd like to think I'd be too ashamed to say I knew about it and did nothing.

Exactly!

 

I suppose I'd also like to think if I knew something I'd have said something at the time... and that brings us back to the old argument about what you KNOW and what rumour says.  

Kaffs
Originally Posted by KaffyBaffy:
Originally Posted by Yogi19:
Originally Posted by KaffyBaffy:
Originally Posted by Yogi19:

These revelations just get worse and worse.

It beggars belief that so many people were aware of/heard rumours/had suspicions about what Savile was doing - and yet nobody said or did anything to stop it. It's like some sort of conspiracy of silence, and I am baffled as to why Savile appears to have been untouchable.

Me too.. I'm getting more and more p'd off with all these people coming forward saying how the can't believe it took so long for it to be reported.     If they have first hand knowledge of an office or can corroborate an accusation, or help nail some living offender - go to the police.  Otherwise - why go to the papers and spout off about how terrible it all was?  I'd like to think I'd be too ashamed to say I knew about it and did nothing.

Exactly!

 

I suppose I'd also like to think if I knew something I'd have said something at the time... and that brings us back to the old argument about what you KNOW and what rumour says.  

Very true, and I guess nobody wants to speak out without evidence to back it up.

Yogi19

I do believe that fear is the reason that so many are unwilling to talk.I also think that people in high positions,politicians,clergy,crown office,royalty 

 are up to their mucky eyes in this sad sorry affair.It has been suggested that Jill Dando had/was about to blow the whistle.Read on Icke forum that the Louis Theroux youtube video of his interview with Savile has now been blocked.Info on "Fluff" Freeman has all but disappeared from Google.

 

FM
Originally Posted by Yogi19:
Originally Posted by pirate1111:

i remember that he used to get a bollocking cos with all his millions he still held on to his council owned flat

wonder why..

I dread to think.

even the local bloody council didnt dare cross him

 

i wonder if he kept a sort of diary/account of who was up to the same thing

sort of a safety clause

ie

blackmail

and thats why he got away with stuff

 

its a thought

pirate1111
Originally Posted by pirate1111:
Originally Posted by Yogi19:
Originally Posted by pirate1111:

i remember that he used to get a bollocking cos with all his millions he still held on to his council owned flat

wonder why..

I dread to think.

even the local bloody council didnt dare cross him

 

i wonder if he kept a sort of diary/account of who was up to the same thing

sort of a safety clause

ie

blackmail

and thats why he got away with stuff

 

its a thought

I wouldn't be surprised if that were the case, Pirate. It would certainly explain why he seems to have been untouchable.

Yogi19
Originally Posted by pirate1111:
Originally Posted by Yogi19:
 

I wouldn't be surprised if that were the case, Pirate. It would certainly explain why he seems to have been untouchable.

if it exsists i bet BBC and cops and NHS have read it

and are wearing brown trousers

 

Originally Posted by erinp:

Savile was part of a group/ring full of people who had the same interests and who ran the country,our police service,our justice system,our media.Thats why he could do what he did.

On Panorama last night we were told that minor royalty ,Hollywood stars and UK popstars would visit Duncroft...WHY!.

I think there will be a few quaking in their boots, wondering whether they are also going to be exposed.

Yogi19
Originally Posted by erinp:

Savile was part of a group/ring full of people who had the same interests and who ran the country,our police service,our justice system,our media.Thats why he could do what he did.

On Panorama last night we were told that minor royalty ,Hollywood stars and UK popstars would visit Duncroft...WHY!.

Yeah.

 

It's one for the authorities  

FM
Originally Posted by velvet donkey:
Originally Posted by erinp:

Savile was part of a group/ring full of people who had the same interests and who ran the country,our police service,our justice system,our media.Thats why he could do what he did.

On Panorama last night we were told that minor royalty ,Hollywood stars and UK popstars would visit Duncroft...WHY!.

Yeah.

 

It's one for the authorities  

Jimmy The Pill answer ^^^

FM
Originally Posted by pirate1111:
Originally Posted by Yogi19:
Originally Posted by pirate1111:

i remember that he used to get a bollocking cos with all his millions he still held on to his council owned flat

wonder why..

I dread to think.

even the local bloody council didnt dare cross him

 

i wonder if he kept a sort of diary/account of who was up to the same thing

sort of a safety clause

ie

blackmail

and thats why he got away with stuff

 

its a thought

This is what i was saying to someone last night, i suspect the reason he managed to keep a lid on it for so long was he had some dirt on someone/people with power to stop it all coming out and now he's dead he cant threaten these people with what he knew.

Jen-Star
Originally Posted by erinp:

Omg.. this is along the lines of what i thought in a post above, that does seem very Labour hating... i bet there are just as many stories about tories and every other part of society.... as it says in the link

Wherever one digs in Britain, there are people of rank protecting paedophiles and sharing their proclivities. They remain a tiny minority – but their population is in inverse proportion to their power.

Jen-Star
Originally Posted by Jenstar:
Originally Posted by erinp:

Omg.. this is along the lines of what i thought in a post above, that does seem very Labour hating... i bet there are just as many stories about tories and every other part of society.... as it says in the link

Wherever one digs in Britain, there are people of rank protecting paedophiles and sharing their proclivities. They remain a tiny minority – but their population is in inverse proportion to their power.

I think that's straight from the Daily Mail. I agree that if there was a conspiracy of silence, it must have been across all parties considering the amount of time it's been going on.

cologne 1

[quote]

Stories like these are why I think the Savile witch-hunt is a distraction from something much more serious and systemic. Over and over I have posted to the effect that Jimmy Savile was not that fearsome as an individual: he got away with it because he had protection in the senior echelons of the Establishment. This is the core matter at issue here, not the ‘Celeb perv in 130 in bed romp’ bollocks put out by a slavering press pack.

[quote]

This is it in a nutshell.

I remember Saville first being mentioned in the eighties, but they waited until he died, and are hoping that he will cop for the lot. Three other establishment figures now dead were also abusers but did not work for the BBC. There are so many rumours out there surrounding people very much alive, and right across the spectrum. The press are very good at overturning injunctions concerning the likes of Ryan Giggs, who was merely "knowing" an inlaw, not a criminal offence, yet they remain silent.

 

Garage Joe
Originally Posted by Garage Joe:
Tom Watson's blog crashed!

Is it this, Joe?  http://www.tom-watson.co.uk/

 





A little more background on today’s PMQ’s

I cannot give much more detail until the police have been given more time to investigate whether evidence still exists from the mid-nineties, but here is what I can say.

Last week I was contacted by a former child protection specialist who for some years, had been concerned that a wider investigation regarding the activities of convicted paedophile, Peter Righton was not fully investigated.

He contacted me because he knew I had spoken out in the Murdoch scandal. Over the years, he had lost faith in the ability of politicians to get to the truth. The last time he contacted an MP was in 1994. The MP promised to follow up the case but nothing came of it.

The central allegation was that a large body of material seized in the raid on Righton’s home had not been fully investigated. Though Righton was the subject of a BBC profile in 1994 [I think this is the date] “The Secret Life of a Paedophile”, little had been done to follow up the leads from the case. A specialist unit in Scotland Yard had the material which supplemented a wider investigation into organised paedophile rings in children’s homes.

Over the last few days I have spoken to two other child protection specialists who share the concern of the gentleman who contacted me.

Within the material seized at Righton’s home were letters from known and convicted paedophiles. The contact, who has seen the letters, claimed that one paedophile in particular was of great concern. He said that the paedophile, who worked with children, boasted of a key aide to a former PM who could help get hold of indecent images of children. I am not naming the person for obvious reasons but for clarity it is not former MP, Peter Morrison. This afternoon my office has been bombarded with calls regarding Morrison, I think because he was named by Edwina Currie at the weekend as having inappropriate sexual relations with teenage boys.

I’ll say more when I can but this may not be for some time.

I should say that like with the hacking scandal, a number of people have contacted me this afternoon offering more information regarding the case. I am happy to talk to anyone who can help me – particularly those who came into contact with Righton and his contacts when they were young. I can understand how powerless they must have felt at the time – Righton’s net was cast wide.

One person also contacted me to suggest that the Met held a vast quantity of material suggesting Jimmy Savile was a predatory paedophile. I do not know whether this is true but I do know the source and she has been 100% accurate in the past.

One final thing I should say – I made the decision to ask a question of the PM late this morning and had not had time to write to the Met before speaking out. I have no doubt the Met will take this seriously and am sorry I didn’t have time to forewarn the commissioner of my intention to raise the matter.

I have written to him this afternoon with more details regarding the case. This will obviously remain confidential.

 

Blizz'ard
Originally Posted by Aimee:

Im also surprised that so many people had heard things about him and said nothing, Philip Schofield said on this morning today that he hadn't heard the rumours about him and young children but he had heard rumours about him having sex with dead people (can't think of the correct word) at the hospitals he worked at

Aww surely not

Saint
Originally Posted by Aimee:

Im also surprised that so many people had heard things about him and said nothing, Philip Schofield said on this morning today that he hadn't heard the rumours about him and young children but he had heard rumours about him having sex with dead people (can't think of the correct word) at the hospitals he worked at

Necrophilia....

stonks

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×