Skip to main content

I'm just watching 'the big question' on iplayer and it got me wondering how you lot feel about religion.

I was brought up ultra Catholic. Every step of my life until I was 18 involved nuns; kindergarten, primary, grammar, convent, hospitals and, as a result, I started rejecting religion about the age of 15 because it didn't fit in with what I was taught in science. I haven't changed my mind.

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Originally Posted by Yogi19:

Not sure that a belief in God can be defined as rational or irrational. 

Faith is "a belief that does not rest on material evidence or logical proof". For those who believe, no proof is required and for those those who don't believe, no proof is ever enough.

This has my vote for Post Of The Year, and it's only May!

Rexi
Originally Posted by Yogi19:

Not sure that a belief in God can be defined as rational or irrational. 

Faith is "a belief that does not rest on material evidence or logical proof". For those who believe, no proof is required and for those those who don't believe, no proof is ever enough.

  Well put Yogi

Thats what I'd like to have said... if I had the IQ 

 

FM
Originally Posted by Yogi19:

Not sure that a belief in God can be defined as rational or irrational. 

Faith is "a belief that does not rest on material evidence or logical proof". For those who believe, no proof is required and for those those who don't believe, no proof is ever enough.

Well said Yogi.  For my God is the centre of my life.  I have lived through severe illness and years and years of illness in my darling husband's life.  We could not have hoped to make it through without the strength that faith in God gave us both.  He has gone to be with his Lord now and one day I will join him.  That is all I know and it is enough for me. 

squiggle
Originally Posted by squiggle:
Originally Posted by Yogi19:

Not sure that a belief in God can be defined as rational or irrational. 

Faith is "a belief that does not rest on material evidence or logical proof". For those who believe, no proof is required and for those those who don't believe, no proof is ever enough.

Well said Yogi.  For my God is the centre of my life.  I have lived through severe illness and years and years of illness in my darling husband's life.  We could not have hoped to make it through without the strength that faith in God gave us both.  He has gone to be with his Lord now and one day I will join him.  That is all I know and it is enough for me. 

 

Yogi19
Originally Posted by Roger the Alien:
Originally Posted by Yogi19:

Not sure that a belief in God can be defined as rational or irrational. 

Faith is "a belief that does not rest on material evidence or logical proof". For those who believe, no proof is required and for those those who don't believe, no proof is ever enough.

  Well put Yogi

Thats what I'd like to have said... if I had the IQ 

 

 Don't be fooled by my one semi-sensible post in almost seven years.

Yogi19
Originally Posted by Yogi19:
Originally Posted by Roger the Alien:
Originally Posted by Yogi19:

Not sure that a belief in God can be defined as rational or irrational. 

Faith is "a belief that does not rest on material evidence or logical proof". For those who believe, no proof is required and for those those who don't believe, no proof is ever enough.

  Well put Yogi

Thats what I'd like to have said... if I had the IQ 

 

 Don't be fooled by my one semi-sensible post in almost seven years.

 

FM
Originally Posted by Yogi19:
Originally Posted by Roger the Alien:
Originally Posted by Yogi19:

Not sure that a belief in God can be defined as rational or irrational. 

Faith is "a belief that does not rest on material evidence or logical proof". For those who believe, no proof is required and for those those who don't believe, no proof is ever enough.

  Well put Yogi

Thats what I'd like to have said... if I had the IQ 

 

 Don't be fooled by my one semi-sensible post in almost seven years.

I know  ..............................that was one very profound and sensible post - I was quite blown away.

 

It's a great answer to a tricky question. Quite where I am on the spectrum I find difficult to put into words. My head tells me one thing my heart another.

 

I guess I don't want to put all my eggs in one basket.

Isn't this pretty?

 

 

Soozy Woo
Originally Posted by Soozy Woo:
Originally Posted by Yogi19:
Originally Posted by Roger the Alien:
Originally Posted by Yogi19:

Not sure that a belief in God can be defined as rational or irrational. 

Faith is "a belief that does not rest on material evidence or logical proof". For those who believe, no proof is required and for those those who don't believe, no proof is ever enough.

  Well put Yogi

Thats what I'd like to have said... if I had the IQ 

 

 Don't be fooled by my one semi-sensible post in almost seven years.

I know  ..............................that was one very profound and sensible post - I was quite blown away.

 

It's a great answer to a tricky question. Quite where I am on the spectrum I find difficult to put into words. My head tells me one thing my heart another.

 

I guess I don't want to put all my eggs in one basket.

 

Isn't this pretty?

 

 

 

 

I have a friend like that, as boys I used to call him a "Just in-caser"!

 

 

Enthusiastic Contrafibularities
Last edited by Enthusiastic Contrafibularities

I've been raised Catholic and to some extent I do believe in 'something' but I'm not sure what.  There's no proof that God does OR doesn't exist but there have been times over the years when I've questioned whether or not there is a God if he lets the cruellest of things happen to the most innocent of people.  Then the disgusting sexual abuse by Catholic priests (among others) and the physical and mental abuse the Catholic nuns have inflicted over the years makes me question a religion that hides these kinds of things and doesn't stand up for those who need it most.  Who are they to send the message that God exists and we should obey him when they aren't too keen on obeying anything themselves??

 

I believe in something, just not exactly when the Catholic church tells me to.  I have very little faith in them now.

 

 

Ells
Originally Posted by squiggle:
Originally Posted by Yogi19:

Not sure that a belief in God can be defined as rational or irrational. 

Faith is "a belief that does not rest on material evidence or logical proof". For those who believe, no proof is required and for those those who don't believe, no proof is ever enough.

Well said Yogi.  For my God is the centre of my life.  I have lived through severe illness and years and years of illness in my darling husband's life.  We could not have hoped to make it through without the strength that faith in God gave us both.  He has gone to be with his Lord now and one day I will join him.  That is all I know and it is enough for me. 

FM

I watched some of it but it ran as that program usually runs - and I got bored after a while.  For my part, I don't think it is 'rational' to believe in god, and if it were then it wouldn't be a 'faith'.  It can't be rational to believe in supernatural events, therefore it requires 'faith'. 

 

For example, I don't need faith to believe in coffee, as I've got a cup of it in front of me.  It's far more rational to believe in coffee, than not to believe in coffee.  God less so. 

 

Why would it be any more rational to believe in a god than lots of gods?  Many people who count themselves as Christians don't believe in the Devil.  Yet the devil's clearly a character that the Bible claims exists and of considerably supernatural power too - like God.  So are there really two gods in the Bible? 

 

Either way, they both require a leap of faith. 

 

 

Carnelian
Last edited by Carnelian
Originally Posted by fremsley:
Originally Posted by erinp:
Originally Posted by fremsley:

Experience has led me to believe God and his adversary are very real.

 

I liked Joe's Zappas reference about going direct.

Are you on the turn ?

Always been a believer  

and me I just thought you might be popping into John Paul's for  mass 

FM
Originally Posted by squiggle:

You have misunderstood the story of Sodom and Gomorrah.

The story of Sodom and Gomorrah is vile on many, many levels.  Lot offers up his daughters to be gang raped in place of the angels he's protecting but it his wife gets turned into a pillar of salt for the 'disobedience' of looking backward when instructed not to.  I don't know what morals we're supposed to draw from that. 

 

Disobeying the patriarch is a mortal sin, but daughters are the patriarch's property to sacrifice at will. 

 

A vile and offensive 'morality tale'

 

Carnelian
Last edited by Carnelian
Originally Posted by squiggle:

You are quite right Carnelian.  To believe does require a leap of faith.  Satan certainly exists, the bible explains that he was Lucifer, the brightest and most beautiful of the angels who didn't see why God should be worshipped and not him so he tried to usurp God.

I completely respect your belief, but this particular bible bit always made me wonder where all this happened. Where was God and his angels? No catholic priest has ever been able to answer this and many more questions.

What would happen to me if I was the member of a tribe in the middle of some place in South America that hasn't been discovered yet and have never heard of the bible, the koran or any other religious preaching? Would your God smite me and leave me to an eternity in hell?

 

I much rather lead a life that treats ppl well, adhere to a moral compass and leave the world biodegradable in a humanist coffin and funeral.

cologne 1
Originally Posted by Carnelian:
Originally Posted by squiggle:

You have misunderstood the story of Sodom and Gomorrah.

The story of Sodom and Gomorrah is vile on many, many levels.  Lot offers up his daughters to be gang raped in place of the angels he's protecting but it his wife gets turned into a pillar of salt for the 'disobedience' of looking backward when instructed not to.  I don't know what morals we're supposed to draw from that. 

 

Disobeying the patriarch is a mortal sin, but daughters are the patriarch's property to sacrifice at will. 

 

A vile and offensive 'morality tale'

 

That's exactly why I don't understand why ppl treasure the bible and it's teachings. What about the 'tower of babel'. They all spoke the same language (if you can believe that), but God didn't like that and gave them all a different language to confuse and scatter them.

cologne 1
I think the answer lies in the area of cherry picking. Agents of social control pick the bits (of any of the books) that support their unusual ideas and ignore the other large percentage.
I'm not a big fan of the books but as a religion-lite, low church, C of E, ex choir boy, and campanologist, am quite happy that people enjoy coming together and find comfort in their worship.
One's partner, as a heavy German order, convent educated, guilt ridden, escaped catholic, victim, can only be described as bitter.
Garage Joe
Originally Posted by Garage Joe:
I think the answer lies in the area of cherry picking. Agents of social control pick the bits (of any of the books) that support their unusual ideas and ignore the other large percentage.
I'm not a big fan of the books but as a religion-lite, low church, C of E, ex choir boy, and campanologist, am quite happy that people enjoy coming together and find comfort in their worship.
One's partner, as a heavy German order, convent educated, guilt ridden, escaped catholic, victim, can only be described as bitter.

I think that's where I stand. I don't agonise over it - I was 'educated' in all the bible stories etc at school and Sunday school and the like. As an adult - I don't take it all at face value and have my doubts but if people can live in peace and harmony and get comfort from having a belief - that's a good thing isn't it?

Soozy Woo
Originally Posted by Garage Joe:
I think the answer lies in the area of cherry picking. Agents of social control pick the bits (of any of the books) that support their unusual ideas and ignore the other large percentage.
I'm not a big fan of the books but as a religion-lite, low church, C of E, ex choir boy, and campanologist, am quite happy that people enjoy coming together and find comfort in their worship.
One's partner, as a heavy German order, convent educated, guilt ridden, escaped catholic, victim, can only be described as bitter.


That's me. but I'm not bitter. I've talked to a lot of Dominicans and Jesuits in my life and I've never had a satisfactory answer other than 'that's where belief comes in' and I always felt it was a cop out by the person who answered my questions.  

Can I just add, I don't want to take away from ppl's belief, I'm just questioning it after listening to the debate.

cologne 1
Originally Posted by Garage Joe:
I think the answer lies in the area of cherry picking. Agents of social control pick the bits (of any of the books) that support their unusual ideas and ignore the other large percentage.
I'm not a big fan of the books but as a religion-lite, low church, C of E, ex choir boy, and campanologist, am quite happy that people enjoy coming together and find comfort in their worship.
One's partner, as a heavy German order, convent educated, guilt ridden, escaped catholic, victim, can only be described as bitter.

yes, but it's part of Biblical canon for a specific reason.  There is a lot of scripture that was excluded from Biblical canon and denounced as heresy.  The reason Sodom and Gomorrah is biblical canon is that those who compiled the OT, wanted virtue to be seen as putting God before all and for daughters and wife to be regarded as totally subservient to the patriarch. God > Patriarch (the channel for God's will) > wife > daughters.  It also wanted homosexuality to be seen as a sin against god and to be a sin worthy of God's wrath.  Additionally, the wife was turned into a pillar of salt because she didn't do as she was told by Lot, who was a confident of God.  Therefore the wilful, disobedient female is punished for her wayward behaviour of not doing as she's told by her husband.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Carnelian
Last edited by Carnelian

Theres nothing about religion that can be called "rational"

 

Why is it that when people survive natural disasters or get saved by the emergency services they say "god saved me" and "god" gets the credit for those who survive or any good that comes out of these tragic events, but god never gets the blame for the disaster happening in the first place....that's a great deal if you can get it, get the credit for all the good things but never gets any blame for the bad things.

Videostar

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×