Don't  know Longcat, but to be honest Shabby is incapable of keeping her trap shut so guess she will eventually spill her guts.  I think Shabby and Gollum should definately be punished for discussing who they would choose if they won the scooter task.Hate the pair of them.

Don't see why not. It's still about noms isn't it?  

The twist is supposed to stop the block vote but not Shabby, she and her buddy are allowed to confer.

They aren't allowed to discuss nominations....so that rule must apply, supposed to come to a decision by themselves without anyone else's input...definately a rule break

But it's not a nom is it? I think BB should tell us.

Of course it is longcat. The convo in the kitchen is testament to them conferring about their choices if either of them should win the task.   Crazy frog was clearly influencing the outcome!   

Hmmmmm, not sure.

Maybe BB expected them to forget and get surprised every week.

But they were conferring Blizzie...surely that's against the rules

It is for noms, but have they actually been told that they can't discuss who they would swap with, if they won the task?

BB need to make it clear, if that is allowed, or not.

It's certainly not what you could describe as keeping with the spirit of the nomination challenge.

I don`t know but if it is allowed...why did they speak in code when there was no-one else in the room?

....I see what you mean Blizzie....yes, it does need clarification...but I read it as noms connected, so it must be a rule break....but there's your other side to it as well...Hmmmmm!

It's not technically a nom so that is maybe BB's get out clause if people complain.

It was the codeword that amused me 

 It was so daft it was funny.

Ciao velvet  

It is obviously going to be one rule for some and another for the *chosen* ones

When it was forst done last week they were told no confiring....

I was looking for Dreadlocks....